Skip to main content
Log in

Some new results on generalized additive games

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Generalized Additive Game (GAG) (Cesari et al. in Int J Game Theory 46(4):919–939, 2017) is a Transferable Utility (TU) game (Nv), where each player in N is provided with an individual value, and the worth v(S) of a coalition \(S \subseteq N\) is obtained as the sum of the individual values of players in another subset \(\mathcal {M}(S)\subseteq N\). Based on conditions on the map \(\mathcal {M}\) (which associates to each coalition S a set of beneficial players \(\mathcal {M}(S)\) not necessarily included in S), in this paper we characterize classes of GAGs that satisfy properties like monotonicity, superadditivity, (total) balancedness, PMAS-admissibility and supermodularity, for all nonnegative vectors of individual values. We also illustrate the application of such conditions on \(\mathcal {M}\) over particular GAGs studied in the literature (e.g., glove games (Shapley and Shubik in Int Econ Rev 10:337–362, 1969), generalized airport games (Norde et al. in Eur J Oper Res 136(3):635–654, 2002), fixed tree games (Bjørndal et al. in Math Methods Oper Res 59(2):249–270, 2004), link-connection games (Moretti in Multi-agent systems and agreement technologies, vol 10767. Springer, Cham, 2008; Nagamochi et al. in Math Oper Res 22(1):146–164, 1997), simple minimum cost spanning tree games (Norde et al. in Eur J Oper Res 154(1):84–97, 2004; Tijs et al. in Eur J Oper Res 175(1):121–134, 2006) and graph coloring games (Deng et al. in Math Program 87(3):441–452, 2000; Hamers et al. in Math Program 145(1–2):509–529, 2014)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aadithya KV, Ravindran B, Michalak TP, Jennings NR (2010) Efficient computation of the Shapley value for centrality in networks. In: International workshop on internet and network economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13

  • Amer R, Giménez JM (2004) A connectivity game for graphs. Math Methods Oper Res 60(3):453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao JM (2000) Cooperative games on combinatorial structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal E, Koster M, Tijs S (2004) Weighted allocation rules for standard fixed tree games. Math Methods Oper Res 59(2):249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonzon E, Maudet N, Moretti S (2014) Coalitional games for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA’14), p 201

  • Borm P, Hamers H, Hendrickx R (2001) Operations research games: a survey. Top 9(2):139–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brânzei R, Fragnelli V, Tijs S (2002) Tree-connected peer group situations and peer group games. Math Methods Oper Res 55(1):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzei R, Moretti S, Norde Tijs S (2004) The P-value for cost sharing in minimum cost spanning tree situations. Theor Decis 56(1–2):47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesari G, Lucchetti R, Moretti S (2017) Generalized additive games. Int J Game Theory 46(4):919–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Ibaraki T, Nagamochi H, Zang W (2000) Totally balanced combinatorial optimization games. Math Program 87(3):441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamers H, Miquel S, Norde H (2014) Monotonic stable solutions for minimum coloring games. Math Program 145(1–2):509–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamers H, Horozoglu N, Norde H, Platz T (2019) On totally balanced, submodular and PMAS-admissible weighted minimum colouring games. Working paper

  • Lindelauf RHA, Hamers HJM, Husslage BGM (2013) Cooperative game theoretic centrality analysis of terrorist networks: The cases of jemaah islamiyah and al qaeda. Eur J Oper Res 229(1):230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild SC, Owen G (1973) A simple expression for the Shapley value in a special case. Manage Sci 20:370–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild SC, Thompson GF (1977) Aircraft landing fees: a game theory approach. Bell J Econ 8:186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti S (2018) On cooperative connection situations where the players are located at the edges. In: Belardinelli F, Argente E (eds) Multi-agent systems and agreement technologies, vol 10767. EUMAS 2017, AT 2017 Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti S, Norde H (2021) A note on weighted multi-glove games. Soc Choice Welf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01337-8

  • Moretti S, Norde H, Pham Do KH, Tijs S (2002) Connection problems in mountains and monotonic allocation schemes. Top 10(1):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamochi H, Zeng DZ, Kabutoya N, Ibaraki T (1997) Complexity of the minimum base game on matroids. Math Oper Res 22(1):146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norde H, Fragnelli V, García-Jurado I, Patrone F, Tijs S (2002) Balancedness of infrastructure cost games. Eur J Oper Res 136(3):635–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norde H, Moretti S, Tijs S (2004) Minimum cost spanning tree games and population monotonic allocation schemes. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto Y (2003) Submodularity of some classes of the combinatorial optimization games. Math Methods Oper Res 58(1):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver A (2003) Combinatorial optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS, Shubik M (1969) Pure competition, coalitional power, and fair division. Int Econ Rev 10:337–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprumont Y (1990) Population monotonic allocation schemes for cooperative games with transferable utility. Games Econ Behav 2:378–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri NR, Narahari Y (2008) Determining the top-k nodes in social networks using the Shapley value. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 3, pp 1509–1512

  • Tijs S, Branzei R, Moretti S, Norde H (2006) Obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree situations and their monotonicity properties. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese H (2004) The outside-option value-axiomatization and application to the gloves game. Mimeo, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölk ES (1965) A note on “the comparability graph of a tree”. Proc Am Math Soc 16:17–20

  • Yan J, Chen J, Chang GJ (1996) Quasi-threshold graphs. Discret Appl Math 69:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S. Moretti gratefully acknowledges the support of the ANR project THEMIS (ANR-20-CE23-0018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Moretti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moretti, S., Norde, H. Some new results on generalized additive games. Int J Game Theory 51, 87–118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-021-00786-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-021-00786-w

Keywords

Navigation