Skip to main content
Log in

Core extensions for non-balanced TU-games

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A family of core extensions for cooperative TU-games is introduced. These solution concepts are non-empty when applied to non-balanced games yet coincide with the core whenever the core is non-empty. The extensions suggest how an exogenous regulator can sustain a stable and efficient outcome, financing a subsidy via individual taxes. Economic and geometric properties of the solution concepts are studied. When taxes are proportional, the proportional prenucleolus is proposed as a single-valued selection device. An application of these concepts to the decentralization of a public goods economy is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1964) The bargaining set for cooperative games. In: Dresher M, Shapley L, Tucker A (eds) Advances in game theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 442–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Border KC (1985) Fixed point theorems with applications to economics and game theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Maschler M (1965) The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Res Logist Q 12: 223–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dréze J, LeBreton M, Savvateev A, Weber S (2007) ‘Almost’ subsidy-free spatial pricing in a multi-dimensional setting. CORE Working Paper 2007/30, Université catholique de Louvain

  • Grotte JH (2000) Computation of and observations on the nucleolus, the normalized nucleolus and the central games. Master’s thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca

  • Hwang YA, Sudhölter P (2000) Axiomatizations of the core on the universal domain and other natural domains. Int J Game Theory 29(4): 597–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannai Y (1992) The core and balancedness. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory with economic applications, vol 1. North-Holland, New York, pp 355–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon Y, Yu P (1977) Stabilization through taxation in n-person games. J Optim Theory Appl 23(2): 277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti R, Patrone F, Tijs SH, Torre A (1987) Continuity properties of solution concepts for cooperative games. OR Spektrum 9(2): 101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A (1980) Efficiency and decentralization in the pure theory of public goods. Q J Econ 94(4): 625–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler M, Peleg B, Shapley L (1979) Geometric properties of the kernel, nucleolus, and related solution concepts. Math Oper Res 4(4): 303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1985) The separability axiom and equal-sharing methods. J Econ Theory 36(1): 120–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1995) Une évaluation de la théorie des jeux coopératifs. Rev d’Economie Politique 105(4): 617–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Orshan G, Sudhölter P (2001) The positive core of a cooperative game. Discussion Paper 268, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

  • Peleg B (1986) On the reduced game property and its converse. Int J Game Theory 15(3): 187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1969) The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J Appl Math 17(6): 1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS, Shubik M (1966) Quasi-cores in a monetary economy with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica 34(4): 805–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadenuma K (1992) Reduced games, consistency, and the core. Int J Game Theory 20(4): 325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45(3): 249–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijs SH, Driessen SH (1986) Extensions of solution concepts by means of multiplicative ε-tax games. Math Soc Sci 12(1): 9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooders MH, Zame WR (1984) Approximate cores of large games. Econometrica 52(6): 1327–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young H (1985) Monotonic solutions of cooperative games. Int J Game Theory 14: 65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP, Okada N, Hashimoto T (1982) Cost allocation in water resources development. Water Resour Res 18(3): 463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (2000) The core in an oligopoly market with indivisibility. Econ Theory 16: 181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (2001) The relative interior of the base polyhedron and the core. Econ Theory 18(3): 635–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Camilo Gómez.

Additional information

We wish to thank the editor, a referee, an anonymous reviewer, Beth Allen, Marc Dudey, Yakar Kannai, Herve Moulin, Marcel Richter, Luis Sánchez-Mier, and the participants in the Microeconomic Theory Workshop at Rice University for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bejan, C., Gómez, J.C. Core extensions for non-balanced TU-games. Int J Game Theory 38, 3–16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-008-0135-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-008-0135-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation