We develop a nowcasting framework, based on microlevel data, to provide faster estimates of the Finnish monthly real economic activity indicator, the Trend Indicator of Output (TIO), and of quarterly GDP. We use firm-level turnovers, which are available shortly after the end of the reference month, and real-time traffic volumes data, to form our set of predictors. We rely on combinations of nowcasts obtained from a range of statistical models and machine learning techniques which are able to handle high-dimensional information sets. The results of our pseudo-real-time analysis indicate that a simple nowcast combination based on these models provides faster estimates of TIO and GDP, without increasing substantially the revision error.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
A description of this indicator is available at http://www.stat.fi/til/ktkk/index_en.html.
In our exercise, we compute both nowcasts (predictions of a variable while the reference period is still ongoing) and backcasts (estimates referring to a period which already ended). We refer to our predictions as nowcasts, to be in line with the literature (see Banbura et al. 2011).
More details on the techniques we use and on the estimation procedure are provided in online appendix.
The data are available at https://aineistot.vayla.fi/lam/rawdata.
Statistics Finland adjusts monthly TIO figures so that they are consistent with quarterly GDP growth estimates, once the latter become available. The same adjustment is done to quarterly GDP when yearly GDP figures are released. The practical implication of this procedure is the presence of large revisions of historical growth rates at the monthly and quarterly frequency.
In our exercise, this set of models includes 21 specifications, such the factor augmented automated ARIMA, regression splines, tree-based regressions, ridge regressions, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and boosting.
Aastveit KA, Trovik T (2014) Estimating the output gap in real time: a factor model approach. Q Rev Econ Finance 54(2):180–193
Altissimo F, Cristadoro R, Forni M, Lippi M, Veronese G (2010) New Eurocoin: tracking economic growth in real time. Rev Econ Stat 92(4):1024–1034
Aruoba SB, Diebold FX, Scotti C (2009) Real-time measurement of business conditions. J Bus Econ Stat 27(4):417–427
Bai J, Ng S (2002) Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica 70(1):191–221
Bai J, Ng S (2009) Boosting diffusion indices. J Appl Econom 24(4):607–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1063
Baldacci E, Buono D, Kapetanios G, Krische S, Marcellino M, Mazzi GL, Papailias F (2016) Big data and macroeconomic nowcasting: from data access to modelling. Technical report
Banbura M, Giannone D, Reichlin L (2011) Nowcasting. In: Hendry DF, Clements M (eds) Oxford handbook of economic forecasting. Oxford University Press, Oxford
De Mol C, Giannone D, Reichlin L (2008) Forecasting using a large number of predictors: is Bayesian shrinkage a valid alternative to principal components? J Econom 146(2):318–328
Doz C, Giannone D, Reichlin L (2011) A two-step estimator for large approximate dynamic factor models based on Kalman filtering. J Econom 164(1):188–205
Evans MDD (2005) Where are we now? Real-time estimates of the macroeconomy. Int J Cent Bank 1(2):127–175
Fernandez-Rodriguez F, Sosvilla-Rivero S, Andrada-Felix J (1999) Exchange-rate forecasts with simultaneous nearest-neighbour methods: evidence from the EMS. Int J Forecast 15(4):383–392
Fornaro P (2016) Predicting Finnish economic activity using firm-level data. Int J Forecast 32(1):10–19
Forni M, Hallin M, Lippi M, Reichlin L (2000) The generalized dynamic-factor model: identification and estimation. Rev Econ Stat 82(4):540–554
Giannone D, Reichlin L, Small D (2008) Nowcasting: the real-time informational content of macroeconomic data. J Monet Econ 55(4):665–676
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Hyndman R, Khandakar Y (2008) Automatic time series forecasting: the forecast package for R. J Stat Softw 27(3):1–22
Hyndman RJ, Athanasopoulos G (2018) Forecasting: principles and practice. OTexts, Melbourne
Josse J, Husson F (2016) missMDA: a package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J Stat Softw 70(1):1–31
Matheson TD, Mitchell J, Silverstone B (2010) Nowcasting and predicting data revisions using panel survey data. J Forecast 29(3):313–330
Modugno M (2013) Now-casting inflation using high frequency data. Int J Forecast 29(4):664–675
Nyman R, Ormerod P (2017) Predicting economic recessions using machine learning algorithms. Papers arXiv:1701.01428
Plakandaras V, Papadimitriou T, Gogas P (2015) Forecasting daily and monthly exchange rates with machine learning techniques. J Forecast 34(7):560–573
Stock JH, Watson MW (2002a) Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 97:1167–1179
Stock JH, Watson MW (2002b) Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes. J Bus Econ Stat 20(2):147–62
Stock JH, Watson MW (2004) Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. J Forecast 23(6):405–430
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 58(1):267–288
Wohlrabe K, Buchen T (2014) Assessing the macroeconomic forecasting performance of boosting: evidence for the United States, the Euro area and Germany. J Forecast 33(4):231–242
Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 67(2):301–320
We gratefully acknowledge the editors Robert M. Kunst and Martin Wagner, as well as two anonymous referees, for providing helpful comments. Moreover, the authors wish to thank the participants at the 1st Vienna Workshop on Economic Forecasting 2018, the BigNOMICS Workshop on Big Data and Economic Forecasting 2019 and the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics 2018. We are also grateful for the valuable help provided by Faiz Alsuhail, Satu Elho, Samu Hakala, Ville Vertanen, Reetta Moilanen, Markku Kotilainen, Mika Maliranta, Markku Lehmus and Antti Ripatti.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This research is part of the ESSnet Big Data project of Eurostat.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Fornaro, P., Luomaranta, H. Nowcasting Finnish real economic activity: a machine learning approach. Empir Econ 58, 55–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01809-y
- Flash estimates
- Machine learning
- Microlevel data