Skip to main content
Log in

The Moses effect: can central banks really guide foreign exchange markets?

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central banks seek to guide the foreign exchange market through interventions. However, the success of the central bank in guiding the forex markets, much like the biblical Moses, depends on the differing perceptions and resulting bid–ask spreads of market participants following intervention. Using high-frequency data, we study the behaviour of exchange rate volatility (as reflected in change in bid–ask spreads) following intervention by Reserve Bank of India, India’s central bank. We find that intervention increases the probability of volatility being in higher ranges. Event-wise analysis shows an increase in volatility in shorter time frames and a decrease in volatility over the longer time frame of the day, following intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The intervention through select public sector banks is referred to as ‘indirect intervention’ in RBI (2013). The term ‘indirect intervention’ is used much more broadly in the literature (see Neely 2000) to refer to policy changes (capital and exchange controls) as well as intervention through ‘undisclosed foreign exchange accounts held at commercial banks’ (Neely Ibid: p.26). Policy changes would impact exchange rates in a very different way than the intervention carried out through select banks. We therefore refer to the interventions carried out though PSBs as ‘undisclosed or secret interventions’.

  2. For example: News Report from Cogencis: 11th November, 2016, 10.09 am: India Rupee: Cut some losses on DLR sales by PSU BKS likely for RBI. It is reported that public sector banks (likely on behalf of RBI) was in the market selling dollars (at 67.15 rupees per dollar).

  3. In the intra-day framework, we consider only intervention through purchase and sale of foreign currency through PSBs, as reported by news, referred to in this paper as ‘undisclosed or secret intervention’. Indirect intervention (through policy changes) is not part of our model as it is unlikely to have much impact in the intra-day time frame.

  4. Technical analysis refers to a set of qualitative or quantitative indicators that can generate trading signals. See Menkoff & Taylor (2007) for a comprehensive review of literature on technical analysis strategies and their profitability.

  5. Intervention to reverse the exchange rate direction is referred to as leaning against the wind (LAW).

  6. Cogencis Information Services Ltd, (2016).

  7. Cogencis Information Services Ltd, Ibid. For majority of news given by Cogencis, and especially the intervention news, the journalist/contributor’s name is mentioned in news item.

  8. The lack of availability of public data on the precise timing of intervention contributes to this problem. For example, Neely (2005) points out only Switzerland shares the exact timing of intervention.

  9. We recognize the loss of information from the conversion of continuous to discreet (categorical) variable but the differentiation into high medium and low volatility buckets is crucial for the Logit analysis used in the paper. To keep the information loss as minimal we increase the number of categories (three) (Pasta, 2009).

References

  • Adler G, Lisack N, Mano R (2015) Unveiling the effects of foreign exchange intervention: a panel approach, Working Paper No. 15/130, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Archer D (2005). Foreign exchange market intervention, methods and tactics. In: Bank for International Settlements, Foreign exchange market intervention in emerging markets, motives, techniques and implications, BIS Papers No 24, pp. 40–55. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap24.htm. Accessed Sept 2016

  • Baillie R, Osterberg W (1997) Why Do Central Banks Intervene ? J Int Money Finance 16(6):909–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee B, Zeman J, Ľudovít O, Riiska W (2018) On the effectiveness of central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market: the case of Slovakia, 1999–2007. Comp Econ Stud 60(3):442–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (2013) Market volatility and foreign exchange intervention in EMEs: what has changed? BIS Papers no 73. https://www.bis.org/publ/b:df/bispap73.htm Accessed Mar 2018

  • Basu K (2009) The mechanics of central bank intervention in foreign exchange markets. Working Papers 09-02, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics. 09–02. https://cae.economics.cornell.edu/09-02.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Behera, H, Narasimhan V, Murty KN (2008) Relationship between exchange rate volatility and central bank intervention: an empirical analysis for India, South Asia Economic Journal: 69-84

  • Beine M, Laurent S, Lecourt C (2003) Official interventions and exchange rate volatility: new evidence form a switching regime analysis. Eur Econ Rev 47(5):891–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beine M, Lahaye J, Laurent S, Neely C, Palm F (2007) Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility: it’s continuous and jump components. Int J Finance Econ 12(2):201–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya U, Weller P (1997) The advantage to hiding one’s hand: speculation and central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market. J Monet Econ 39(2):251–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjønnes GH, Rime D (2005) Dealer behavior and trading systems in foreign exchange markets. J Finance Econ 75(3):571–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T, Melvin M (1994) Bid-ask spread and volatility in the foreign exchange market: an empirical analysis. J Int Econ 36:355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser-Neal C, Tanner G (1996) Central bank intervention and the volatility of foreign exchange rates: evidence from the options market. J Int Money Finance 15(6):853–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo M, Humpage O, Schwartz A (2012) The federal reserve as an informed foreign exchange trader: 1973–1995. Int J Cent Bank 8(1):127–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Lakonishok J, LeBaron B (1992) Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. J Finance 47:1731–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamon M, Garcia M, Souza L (2017) FX interventions in Brazil: a synthetic control approach. J Int Econ 108:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari A (2007) Heterogeneous market-making in foreign exchange markets: evidence from individual bank responses to central bank interventions. J Money Credit Bank 39(5):1131–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Watanabe T, Yabu T (2012) A new method for identifying the effects of foreign exchange interventions. J Money Credit Bank 44:1507–1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YF, Funke M, Glanemann N (2013) The signalling channel of central bank interventions: modelling the Yen/US dollar exchange rate. Open Econ Rev 25(2):311–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chutasripanich N, Yetman J (2015). Foreign exchange intervention: strategies and effectiveness. In: BIS Working Papers No 499. https://www.bis.org/publ/work499.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Cogencis Information Services Ltd (2016). Database. https://www.cogencis.com. Accessed Sept 2016

  • De Roure C, Furnagiev S, Reitz S (2015) The microstructure of exchange rate management: FX intervention and capital controls in Brazil. Appl Econ 47(34–35):3617–3632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disyatat P, Galati G (2007) The Effectiveness of foreign exchange intervention in emerging market countries: evidence from the Czech Koruna. J Int Money Finance 26(3):383–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez K (1998) Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Finance 17:161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez K, Frankel J (eds) (1993) Does foreign exchange intervention work?. Institute For International Economics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger C, Stadtmann G (2008) What drives heterogeneity in foreign exchange rate expectations: insights from a new survey. Int J Finance Econ 13(4):360–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic times (2015), RBI can use Forex reserves to curb volatility: Raghuram Rajan, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/forex/rbi-can-use-forex-reserves-to-curb-volatility-raghuram-rajan/articleshow/48648810.cms. Accessed Sept 2016

  • Evans M, Lyons R (2002) Order flow and exchange rate dynamics. J Polit Econ 110(1):170–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/324391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatum R, Hutchison M (2003) Is sterilised foreign exchange intervention effective after all ? An event study approach. Econ J 113(487):390–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatum R, King M, (2005). Rules versus discretion in foreign exchange intervention: evidence from official Bank of canada high- frequency data. In: EPRU Working Paper Series 05-06 Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU) University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/kud/epruwp/05-06.html. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Fatum R, Pedersen J, Sørensen P (2013) The intraday effects of central bank intervention on exchange rate spreads. J Int Money Finance 33:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming M, Remolona E (1999) Price formation and liquidity in the US treasury market: the response to public information. J Finance 54(5):1901–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galati, G. (2000) Trading volumes, volatility and spreads in foreign exchange markets: evidence from emerging market countries. In: BIS Working Paper No. 93

  • García-Verdú S, Ramos Francia M (2014) Interventions and expected exchange rates in emerging market economies. Q J Finance 4(1):1450002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersl A (2006) Testing the effectiveness of the Czech National Bank’s foreign-exchange interventions. Czech J Econ Finance 56:398–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersl A, Holub T (2006) Foreign exchange interventions under inflation targeting: the Czech experience. Contemp Econ Pol 24(4):475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann P (1999) Trading volumes and transaction costs in the foreign exchange market. J Bank Finance 23:801–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung JH (1997) Intervention strategies and exchange rate volatility: a noise trading perspective. J Int Money Finance 16(5):779–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito T, Yabu T (2004) What promotes Japan tointervene in the foreign exchange market? A new approach to a reaction function. J Int Money Finance 26:193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky GL, Lewis KK (1996) Does foreign exchange intervention signal future monetary policy? J Monet Econ 37(2–3):285–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns Jonathan, Rigobon Roberto (2005) Identifying the efficacy of central bank interventions: evidence from Australia and Japan. J Int Econ 66(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kortian T, Sheen J (2000) Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility—Australian evidence. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 10(210):381–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y (2017) A stopping time approach to assessing the effectiveness of foreign exchange intervention: an application to Japanese data. J Int Money Finance 75:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron B (1999) Technical trading rule profitability and foreign exchange intervention. J Int Econ 49:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livemint (2015) Raghuram Rajan seen keeping rupee out of currency war to hold credibility. https://www.livemint.com/Industry/dFyZIcrCFqdyqVJeUrWnWI/Raghuram-Rajan-seen-keeping-rupee-out-of-currency-war-to-hol.html. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Menkoff L, Taylor M (2007) The obstinate passion of foreign exchange professionals: technical analysis. J Econ Lit 45(4):936–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima K, Montoro C (2013). Impact of Foreign Exchange Interventions on Exchange Rate Expectations, In: BIS Paper No. 73d. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2497133. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Mohanty, M S (2013) Market volatility and foreign exchange intervention in EMEs: what has changed? An overview. In: BIS Papers, No 73, https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap73.htm. Accessed Sept Mar 2018

  • Murphy J (1999) Technical analysis of financial markets. Penguin Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo A, Nimalendran M (2000) The impact of government intervention on transactions costs in foreign exchange markets. Rev Financ Stud 132:453–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely C (2000) The practice of central bank intervention: looking under the hood. Cent Bank 11(2):24–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely C (2005) An analysis of recent studies of the effect of foreign exchange intervention. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 87(6):685–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler CL, Mende A, Menkhoff L (2011) Price discovery in currency markets. J Int Money Finance 30(8):1696–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquariello P (2007) Informative trading or just costly noise? An analysis of Central Bank interventions. J Financ Mark 10:107–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasta D (2009) Learning when to be discrete: continuous vs. categorical predictors. Paper 248–2009, SAS Global Forum. http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings09/248-2009.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018

  • Pinches G (1970) The random walk hypothesis and technical analysis. Financ Anal J 26(2):104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pring MJ (2014) Technical analysis explained, 5th edn. Mc Graw Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan R (2016) India in the global economy, inaugural Kotak family distinguished lecture, Deepak and Neera Raj Center on Indian Economic Policies, Columbia University, by Dr. Raghuram Rajan, Governor of the Reserve Bank of India. http://indianeconomy.columbia.edu/content/video-rbi-governor-raghuram-rajans-lecture-columbia Accessed Mar 2018

  • Reitz S, Taylor M (2008) The coordination channel of foreign exchange intervention: a nonlinear microstructural analysis. Eur Econ Rev 52(1):55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India (2013), Intervention in foreign exchange markets: the approach of the Reserve Bank of India, In BIS (2013), Market volatility and foreign exchange intervention in EMEs: what has changed? An overview. In: BIS Papers, No 73, https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap73.htm

  • Reuters, January 30, (2014). RBI Governor says must prevent extreme volatility in rupee - TV, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rbi-governor-says-must-prevent-131213307.html, Accessed Mar 2018

  • Roy Trivedi S, Apte PG (2016) Central Bank Intervention in USD/INR Market: estimating its reaction function and impact on volatility. Asia-Pacific Finance Mark 23(3):263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saacke P (2002) Technical analysis and the effectiveness of central bank intervention. J Int Money Finance 21(4):459–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalia A (2008) Is foreign exchange intervention effective? Some microanalytical evidence from the Czech Republic. J Int Money Finance 27(4):529–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein JC (1989) Cheap talk and the Fed: a theory of imprecise policy announcements. Am Econ Rev 79(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia M, Tokman A, Landerretche O, Rigobón R (2004) Effects of foreign exchange intervention under public information: the chilean case. Economía 4(2):215–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M (2005) Official foreign exchange intervention as a coordinating signal in the dollar– yen market. Pac Econ Rev 10(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the editor and anonymous referee/s for their valuable comments during the review process. The views on this article correspond to the author and do not reflect those of institution to which the author belongs to. Errors, if any, are my responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smita Roy Trivedi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy Trivedi, S. The Moses effect: can central banks really guide foreign exchange markets?. Empir Econ 58, 2837–2865 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01671-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01671-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation