Advertisement

Is innovation a factor in merger decisions? Evidence from a panel of US firms

  • Mahdiyeh EntezarkheirEmail author
  • Saeed Moshiri
Article
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

The impact of innovation on mergers has been a subject of debate in merger enforcements. Firms may decide to merge because of increasing market share and expanding capacity. However, mergers may also be motivated by innovation since they provide resources for commercialization of innovation and allow for capturing knowledge spillovers. There are myriad studies on the drivers of mergers, but empirical evidence on innovation-induced changes of merger likelihood is limited. In this paper, we construct a panel data set of mergers among publicly traded US manufacturing firms from 1980 to 2003 and investigate the impact of innovation on merger decisions controlling for business cycles and proxies of neoclassical, behavioural and Q-theories of mergers. Our measure of innovation is based on the citation-weighted patent stock. We find that innovations are positively and significantly correlated with firms’ merger likelihood. Our results on the control variables, such as business cycles, Tobin’s q, and market shares, are also consistent with those reported in the literature. We also find that the magnitude of the merger impact of innovation varies across industries. Our main result is robust to alternative measures of innovation and different estimation methods.

Keywords

Merger Innovation Business cycle Anti-trust Competition Patent 

JEL Classification

L12 L22 L40 L44 L60 O31 O34 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an Inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 120(2):701–728Google Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(1):323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali-Yrkko J (2006) Technology sourcing through acquisitions: Do high quality patents attract acquirers? ETLA discussion paper 1065Google Scholar
  4. Andrade G, Stafford E (2004) Investigating the economic role of mergers. J Corp Finance 10(1):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrade G, Mitchell M, Stafford E (2001) New evidence and perspectives on mergers. J Econ Perspect 15(2):103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ang J, Cheng Y (2006) Direct evidence on the market-driven acquisitions theory. J Financ Res 29(2):199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and allocation of resources to invention. In: Nelson R (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 609–626Google Scholar
  8. Ashenfelter O, Hosken D, Weinberg M (2014) Did Robert Bork understate the competitive impact of mergers? Evidence from consummated mergers. J Law Econ 57(S3):67–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin P (2007) The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Stat Med 26(1):3078–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandick R, Gorg H, Karpaty P (2014) Foreign acquisitions, domestic multinationals, and R&D. Scand J Econ 116(4):1091–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becketti S (1986) Corporate mergers and the business cycles. Econ Rev 71(5):13–26Google Scholar
  12. Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J Finance 69(5):1923–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blonigen B, Taylor C (2000) R&D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. J Ind Econ 48(1):47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blundell R, Griffith R, VanReenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66(3):529–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brealey R, Myers S, Marcus A, Maynes E, Mitra D (2012) Fundamentas of corporate finance. McGrawHill, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  16. Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of property score matching. J Econ Surv 22(1):31–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cameron C, Trivedi P (2010) Microeconometrics using stata. STATA Press, College StationsGoogle Scholar
  18. Chirgui Z (2009) Dynamics of R&D networked relationships and mergers and acquisitions in the smart card field. Res Policy 38(1):1453–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danzon P, Epstein A, Nicholson S (2007) Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Manag Decis Econ 28(4):307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deman AP, Duysters G (2005) Collaboration and innovation: a review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation. Technovation 25(1):1377–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dong M, Hirshleifer D, Richardson S, Teoh SH (2006) Does investor misvaluation drive the takeover market? J Finance 61(2):725–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duso T, Roller LH, Seldeslachts J (2014) Collusion through joint R&D: an empirical assessment. Rev Econ Stat 96(2):349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Entezarkheir M, Moshiri S (2018) Mergers and innovation: evidence from a panel of U.S. firms. Econ Innov N Technol 27(2):132–153Google Scholar
  24. Frey R, Hussinger K (2006) The role of technology in M&A: a firm level comparison of cross-border and domestic deals. ZEW discussion paper 06-069Google Scholar
  25. Gallini N (2002) The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. J Econ Perspect 16(1):131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giroud X, Mueller H (2010) Does corporate governance matter in comeptitive industries? J Financ Econ 95(1):312–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical model, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Gort M (1969) An economic disturbance theory of mergers. Quart J Econ 83(1):624–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Gugler K, Siebert R (2007) Market power versus efficiency effects of mergers and research joint ventures: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Rev Econ Stat 89(4):645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall B (1987) The effect of takeover activity on corporate research and development. In: Auerbach A (ed) Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. University of Chicago Press for NBER, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall B, Mairesse J (1995) Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in french manufacturing firms. J Econ 65(1):263–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall B, Trajtenberg M (2004) Uncovering GPTs using patent data. J Econ Hist 64(1):61–99Google Scholar
  34. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J Econ 36(1):16–38Google Scholar
  35. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2000) Market value and patent citations: a first look. National Bureau of economic research working paper no. 7741Google Scholar
  36. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of economic research working paper no. 8498Google Scholar
  37. Harford J (2005) What drives merger waves? J Financ Econ 77(1):529–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hasbrouck J (1985) The characteristics of takeover targets, Q and other measures. J Bank Finance 9(3):351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huck S, Konrad K, Muller W (2000) Merger in contests. CESifo working paper no. 241Google Scholar
  40. Jensen M (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J Finance 48(1):831–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jost P, Velden C (2004) Organizational design of R&D after mergers and the role of budget responsibility. J Econ Bus 60(1):469–484Google Scholar
  42. Jovanovic B, Rousseau P (2002) The Q-theory of mergers. Technol Change 92(2):198–204Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan S (ed) (2000) Mergers and productivity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Katz M, Shelanski H (2005) Merger policy and innovation: Must enforcement change to account for technological change? In: Jaffe A, Lerner J, Stern S (eds) Innovation policy and the economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 109–165Google Scholar
  45. Katz M, Shelanski H (2007) Mergers and innovation. Antitrust Law J 74(1):1–85Google Scholar
  46. Keller W (2010) International tade, Forigne direct investment, and technology spillovers. In: Hall B, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 2. Bronwyn Hall and Nathan Rosenberg, Cambridge, pp 793–829Google Scholar
  47. Komlenovic S, Mamun A, Mishra D (2011) Business cycle and aggregate industry mergers. J Econ Finance 35(1):239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loughran T, Vijh A (1997) Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? J Finance 52(5):1765–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maksimovic V, Phillips G (2001) The market for corporate assets: Who engages in mergers and assets sales and are there efficiency gains? J Finance 56(1):2019–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McQueen G, Roley V (1993) Stock prices, news, and business conditions. Rev Financ Stud 6(3):683–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Melicher R, Ledolter J, D’Antonio L (1983) A time eries analysis of aggregate merger activity. Rev Econ Stat 65(3):423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchell M, Mulherin H (1996) The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. J Financ Econ 41(1):193–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moeller S, Schlingeman F, Stulz R (2004) Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. J Financ Econ 73(1):201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moshiri S, Simpson W (2011) Information technology and the changing workplace in Canada: firm-level evidence. Ind Corp Change 20(6):1601–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mulherin H, Boone A (2000) Comparing acquisitions and divestitures. J Corp Finance 6(2):117–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nelson R (1966) Business cycle factors in the choice between internal and external growth, the corporate merger. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  57. Noel M, Schankerman M (2013) Strategic patenting and software innovation. J Ind Econ 61(3):481–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pepall L, Richards D, Norman G (2011) Contemporary industrial organization: a quantitative approach. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  59. Rau R, Vermaelen T (1998) Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms. J Financ Econ 49(1):223–253Google Scholar
  60. Rhodes-Kropf M, Viswanathan S (2004) Market valuation and merger waves. J Finance 59(1):2685–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rhodes-Kropf M, Robinson D, Viswanathan S (2005) Valuation waves and merger activity: the empirical evidence. J Financ Econ 77(1):561–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1985) Constructing a control group using multi-variate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39(1):33–38Google Scholar
  63. Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Shleifer A, Vishny R (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity. J Finance 47(4):1343–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shleifer A, Vishny R (2003) Stock market driven acquisitions. J Financ Econ 70(1):295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stahl J (2010) Mergers and sequential innovation: evidence from patent citations. Working paper in board of Governers of the federal reserve systemGoogle Scholar
  67. Szucs F (2014) M&A and R&D: Asymmetric effects on acquirers and targets? Res Policy 43(1):1264–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J Econ 21(1):172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weston J (1961) The role of mergers in the growth of large firms. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  70. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Ziedonis R (2004) Don’t fence me in: fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Manag Sci 50(6):804–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHuron University College at University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Economics, STM CollegeUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations