Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Asymmetry in the relationship between unemployment and the business cycle

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyses asymmetries in the dynamic relationship between unemployment and the business cycle in the UK and the US. Unemployment rates present clear unconditional asymmetry in both countries. Markov switching regime models with two regimes also display clear asymmetries and show that, in the US, the effect of cyclical contractions on unemployment is much stronger than that of expansions, while in the UK it is observed that male unemployment is much more sensitive to cyclical variations than female unemployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is interesting to remark that the variations in the unemployment rates also depend on cyclical variations that will take place in the following quarter. This implies that the labour market anticipates imminent cyclical changes.

  2. As is typical, we have chosen to specify a binary state variable, although we could represent a more flexible framework by allowing, for instance, for an additional intermediate state between pure expansion and pure contraction.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Scott A (1994) Asymmetries in the cyclical behavior of UK labor markets. Econ J 104:1303–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DW, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62:1383–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat G, Güell M, Manning A (2006) Gender gaps in unemployment rates in OECD countries. J Labor Econ 24:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker R, Hurn S (2009) Testing for nonlinearity in mean in the presence of heteroskedasticity. Econ Anal Policy 39:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila S, Bertola G (1990) Firing costs and labour demand: how bad is eurosclerosis? Rev Econ Stud 57:381–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JR, Fisher JDM (2000) Aggregate employment fluctuations with macroeconomic asymmetries. Am Econ Rev 90:1323–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M, Hu L, Ploberger W (2005) Optimal test for Markov switching. Mimeo, Economics Department, University of Rochester (Forthcoming in Econom.)

  • Cevik EI, Dibooglu S, Barisik S (2013) Asymmetry in the unemployment–output relationship over the business cycle: evidence from transition economies. Comp Econ Stud 55:557–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney HG (1991) The Beveridge curve and Okun’s law: a re-examination of fundamental relationships in the United States. PhD thesis, MIT

  • Crespo Cuaresma J (2003) Okun’s law revisited. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 65:439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JB, Summers LH (1986) Are business cycles symmetrical? In: Gordon RJ (ed) The American business cycle. Continuity and change. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing BT, Levernier W, Malik F (2002) The differential effects of output shocks on unemployment rates by race and gender. South Econ J 68:584–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing BT, Levernier W, Malik F (2005) Modeling unemployment rates by race and gender: a nonlinear time series approach. East Econ J 31:333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld SM, Quandt RE (1973) A Markov model for switching regressions. J Econ 1:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of non-stationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57:357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2005) What’s real about the business cycle? Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 2005:425–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Silverstone B (2001) Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s law: a cross-country comparison. Econ Bull 5:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1980) Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. Carnegie-Mellon University, Discussion Papers 451, Pittsburgh

  • Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank 29:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes MJ, Silverstone B (2006) Okun’s law, asymmetries and jobless recoveries in the United States: a Markov-switching approach. Econ Lett 92:293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss JL, Robertson JC (2012) Asymmetric labour force participation decisions. Appl Econ 44:2065–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Chang Y (2005) Investigating Okun’s law by the structural break with threshold approach: evidence from Canada. Manch School 73:599–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Lin S (2006) A flexible nonlinear inference to Okun’s relationship. Appl Econ Lett 13:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey R (1992) Nonparametric evidence on asymmetry in business cycles using aggregate employment time series. J Econ 51:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop G, Potter SM (1999) Dynamic asymmetries in U.S. unemployment. J Bus Econ Stat 17:298–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes D, Virén M (2002) Asymmetry and the problem of aggregation in the euro area. Empirica 29:47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay A, Reis R (2008) The brevity and violence of contractions and expansions. J Monetary Econ 55:738–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WC (1927) Business cycles: the problem and its setting. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittnik S, Niu Z (1994) Asymmetries in business cycles: econometric techniques and empirical evidence. In: Semmler W (ed) Business cycles: theory and empirical methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 331–350

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neftçi SN (1984) Are economic times series asymmetric over the business cycle? J Polit Econ 92:307–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiró A, Belaire-Franch J, Gonzalo MT (2012) Unemployment, cycle and gender. J Macroecon 34: 1167–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides CA (2003) Unemployment in Britain: a European success story. CEP Discussion Papers dp0600, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE

  • Plosser CI, Schwert GW (1977) Estimation of a non-invertible moving average process. J Econ 6:199–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queneau H, Sen A (2008) Evidence on the dynamics of unemployment by gender. Appl Econ 40:2099–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racine JS, Maasoumi E (2007) A versatile and robust metric entropy test of time-reversibility, and other hypotheses. J Econ 138:547–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvapulle P, Moosa IA, Silvapulle MJ (2004) Asymmetry in Okun’s law. Can J Econ 37:353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T, Lin CF, Granger CWJ (1993) Power of the neural network linearity test. J Time Ser Anal 14:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virén M (2001) The Okun curve is non-linear. Econ Lett 70:253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank an anonymous referee for useful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SEJ2007-67101/ECON) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amado Peiró.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belaire-Franch, J., Peiró, A. Asymmetry in the relationship between unemployment and the business cycle. Empir Econ 48, 683–697 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0803-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0803-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation