Empirical Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 281–303 | Cite as

Does travel inspire? Evidence from the superstars of modern art

  • Christiane HellmanzikEmail author


This paper investigates whether travel increases the value of paintings produced by modern visual artists. The analysis is based on the 214 most prominent modern visual artists born between 1850 and 1945 and auction records of their paintings over the past 20 years. We find that artworks produced in the year of a journey are 7% more valuable than paintings produced in periods with no travel. We attribute this effect to human capital investments, knowledge spillovers and inspiration from the travel destination itself. There are persistent, but declining benefits to travel over the subsequent 4 years. The analysis shows that the impact of travel is smaller for later periods as modern art becomes more abstract. The effect on the value of paintings differs depending on the purpose of a journey: work-related, recreational and politically motivated journeys have a positive contemporaneous effect on value, whereas educational journeys have a negative effect. In addition, we find that France, Germany and the United States are the most frequently visited destinations for modern artists and also yield considerable benefits during times of strong innovation.


Modern artists Mobility Travel Economic geography Human capital Knowledge spillovers Creativity Peer effects 

JEL Classification

J61 R39 N90 Z11 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen T, Dalgaard CJ (2011) Flows of people, flows of ideas, and the inequality of nations. J Econ Growth 16(1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artvalue: Art, Luxe & Collection (2007) Artvalue SA, Luxembourg
  3. Ashenfelter O, Graddy K (2006) Art auctions. In: Ginsburgh V, Throsby D (eds) Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 910–945Google Scholar
  4. Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Q J Econ 125(2): 549–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1964) Human capital. NBER, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions. In: Hall RW (ed) Handbook of transportation science, Chap 2. Springer, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Porath Y (1967) The production of human capital and the lifecycle of earnings. J Polit Econ 75(4): 352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borghans L, Romans M, Sauermann J (2010) What makes a good conference? Analysing the preferences of labour economists. Labour Econ 17: 868–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D’. Econ J 99(397): 569–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksson G (1991) Human capital investments and labour mobility. J Labour Econ 9(3): 236–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frazis H, Loewenstein MK (2005) Reexamining the returns to training: functional form, magnitude, and interpretation. J Hum Resour 40(2): 453–476Google Scholar
  12. Galenson D, Weinberg B (2000) Age and the quality of work: the case of modern american painters. J Polit Econ 108(4): 761–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galenson D, Weinberg B (2001) Creating modern art: the changing careers of painters in France from impressionism to cubism. Am Econ Rev 91(4): 1063–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaeser EL, Hedi DK, Scheinkmann JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6): 1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grove Dictionary of Art: Online (2010) Oxford University Press, Oxford
  16. Hammermesh D (2006) The Value of peripatetic economists: a sesqui-difference evaluation of Bob Gregory. Econ Rec Issue 257: 138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman JJ (1976) A life-cycle model of earnings, learning and consumption. J Polit Econ 86(4): 1–44Google Scholar
  18. Hellmanzik C (2009) Artistic styles: a novel approach to analysing modern artists’ careers. J Cult Econ 33(3): 201–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellmanzik C (2010) Location matters: estimating cluster premiums for prominent modern artists. Eur Econ Rev 54(2): 199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodgson D (2011) Age–price profiles for Canadian painters at auction. J Cult Econ 35: 287–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hovhannisyan N, Keller W (2011) International Business travel: an engine of innovation? NBER Working Paper No. 17100Google Scholar
  22. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3): 577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim EH, Morse A, Zingales L (2006a) Are elite universities losing their competitive edge?. NBER Working Paper 12245Google Scholar
  24. Kim J, Lee S, Marschke G (2006b) International knowledge flows: evidence from an inventor-firm matched data set. NBER Working Paper 12692Google Scholar
  25. Mokyr J (2002) The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Hagan J, Hellmanzik C (2008) Clustering and migration of important visual artist: broad historical evidence. Hist Methods 40(3): 121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Hagan J, Kelly E (2005) Identifying and ranking the most important artists in a historical context: methods used and initial results. Hist Methods 38(3): 118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): (2002) International mobility of the highly skilled. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Oxford Dictionary of Art: New Edition (1997) Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Poole J (2010) Business travel as an input to international trade. mimeo, University of California, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  31. Reclams Künstlerlexikon (2002) Stuttgart: ReclamGoogle Scholar
  32. Renneboog LDR, Spaenjers C (2009) Buying beauty: on prices and returns in the art market. Discussion Paper 2009–15, Tilburg University, Center for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  33. Tani M (2008) Short-term skilled labour movements and economic growth. Int Migr 46(3): 161–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tani M, Dowrick S (2011) International business visits and the technology frontier. Econ Lett 110(3): 209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waldinger F (2009) Peer effects in science—evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper 910Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations