Abstract
In this paper, robust M-estimation of multivariate GARCH models are considered. The simplified GARCH model is chosen that involves the estimation of only univariate GARCH models, and hence easy to estimate, and does not put additional constraints on the model. The results of Monte Carlo simulations showed that accurate estimates of conditional correlations can be obtained using these robust estimators when the errors are heavy-tailed. We also investigate the forecasting performance of the class of robust estimators in predicting value-at-risk using various evaluation measures and collect empirical evidences of the better predictive potential of estimators such as LAD and B-estimator over the widely-used quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for the estimation and prediction of multivariate GARCH models. Applications to real data sets are also presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen TG, Bollerlsev T (1998) Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39: 885–905
Bauwens L, Laurent S, Rombouts JVK (2006) Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. J Appl Econ 21: 79–109
Berkes I, Horváth L (2004) The efficiency of the estimators of the parameters in GARCH processes. Ann Stat 32: 633–655
Bollerslev T, Engle RF, Wooldridge JM (1988) A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances. J Political Econ 96: 116–131
Bollerslev T (1990) Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. Rev Econ Stat 72: 498–505
Brailsford TJ, Faff RW (1996) An evaluation of volatility forecasting technique. J Bank Financ 20: 419–438
Engle RF, Kroner KF (1995) Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econom Theory 11: 122–150
Engle RF (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 20: 339–350
Engle RF, Manganelli S (2004) CAViaR: conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J Bus Econ Stat 22: 367–381
Glosten L, Jagannathan R, Runkle D (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility on the nominal excess returns on stocks. J Financ 48: 1779–1801
Harris RDF, Stoja E, Tucker J (2007) A simplified approach to modelling the comovement of asset returns. J Futur Mark 27: 575–598
He C, Teräsvirta T (2004) An extended constant conditional correlation GARCH model and its fourth-moment structure. Econom Theory 20: 904–926
Higham N (2002) Computing the nearest correlation matrix—a problem from finance. IMA J Numer Anal 22: 329–343
Hosking JRM (1980) The multivariate portmanteau statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 75: 602–608
Iqbal F, Mukherjee K (2010) M-estimators of some GARCH-type models: computation and application. Stat Comput 20: 435–445
Jeantheau T (1998) Strong consistency of estimators of multivariate ARCH models. Econom Theory 14: 70–86
Kupiec PH (1995) Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J Deriv 3: 73–84
Ledoit O, Santa-Clara P, Wolf M (2003) Flexible multivariate GARCH modeling with an application to international stock markets. Rev Econ Stat 85: 735–747
Lopez JA (1999) Methods for evaluating Value-at-Risk estimates. Fed Reserv Bank San Francisco Econ Rev:3-17
Mukherjee K (2008) M-estimation in GARCH model. Econom Theory 24: 1530–1553
Peng L, Yao Q (2003) Least absolute deviations estimation for ARCH and GARCH models. Biom 90: 967–975
Skintzi V, Skiadopoulos G, Refenes AP (2005) The effect of mis-estimating correlation on value-at-risk. J Altern Invest 4: 66–82
Tsay RS (2010) Analysis of Financial Time Series, 3rd Ed. Wiley, Hoboken
Tse YK, Tsui AKC (2002) A multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with time-varying correlations. J Bus Econ Stat 20: 351–362
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iqbal, F. Robust estimation of the simplified multivariate GARCH model. Empir Econ 44, 1353–1372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0588-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0588-y