Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 1435–1453 | Cite as

Firm growth in multinational corporate groups

Article

Abstract

This paper formulates an econometric model of firm growth that explicitly accounts for interdependence of firm growth rates within multinational corporate networks. We apply a recently introduced IV-estimation procedure for peer group effects to directly test for growth spillovers within multinational corporate networks. Using European firm level data, our estimation results indicate negative spillovers within horizontally organized multinational networks, with this effect being most pronounced for corporate groups producing in a larger number of different countries. In contrast, they are positive for vertically organized multinational corporate groups. In the former case, the spillovers lead to more within-network heterogeneity in the firm growth processes and slower average size adjustments. In the latter case, multinational corporate groups as a whole are more stable and, on average, members adjust their size faster. Finally, the robustness analysis demonstrates that the growth spillover effects in purely domestic corporate groups differ from their multinational counterparts and shows that our baseline results are not driven by spurious correlation of individual firm growth rates.

Keywords

Firm growth Size adjustment Multinational corporate groups Peer group effect estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelini P, Generale A (2008) On the evolution of firm size distributions. Am Econ Rev 98: 426–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch DB, Klomp L, Santarelli E, Thurik A (2004) Gibrat’s law: are the services different. Rev Ind Org 24: 301–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belderbos R, Zou J (2007) On the growth of foreign affiliates: multinational plant networks, joint ventures, and flexibility. J Int Bus Stud 38: 1095–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellak C (2004) How domestic and foreign firms differ and why does it matter. J Econ Surv 18: 483–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloningen BA, Tomlin K (2001) Size and growth of Japanese plants in the United States. Int J Ind Org 6: 931–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramoulle Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2009) Identification of peer effects through social networks. J Econom 150: 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckley PJ, Dunning JH, Pearce RD (1984) An analysis of the growth and profitability of the world largest firms 1972 to 1977. Kyklos 37: 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabral LMB (1995) Sunk costs, firm size and firm growth. J Ind Econ 43: 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabral LMB (2007) Small firms in Portugal: a selective survey of stylized facts, economic analysis, and policy implications. Port Econ J 6: 65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabral LMB, Mata J (2003) On the evolution of the firm size distribution: facts and theory. Am Econ Rev 93: 1075–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantwell JA, Sanna-Randaccio F (1993) Multinationality and firm growth. Weltwirtsch Arch Rev World Econ 129: 275–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caves RE (1996) Multinational enterprise and economic analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Coad A (2009) The growth of firms: a survey of theories and empirical evidence. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans DS (1987) Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. J Polit Econ 95: 657–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fazzari SM, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1988: 141–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feinberg S, Phillips G (2004) Growth, capital market development and competition for resources within mnc’s. NBER working paper 9252Google Scholar
  18. Fotopoulos G, Louri H (2004) Firm growth and fDI: are multinationals stimulating local industry development. J Ind Compet Trade 4: 163–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geroski PA (2000) The growth of firms in theory and in practice. In: Foss N, Mahnke V (eds) Governance, competence and entrepreneurship. Advances in economic strategy research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 168–186Google Scholar
  20. Geroski PA (2005) Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Manag Decis Econ 26: 129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geroski PA, Gugler K (2004) Corporate growth convergence in Europe. Oxford Econ Pap 56: 597–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibrat R (1931) Les inequalities economiques. Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Gugler K, Kalkbrenner E, Peev E (2009) The efficiency of internal capital markets. MimeoGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamermesh DS, Pfann GA (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. J Econ Lit 34: 1264–1292Google Scholar
  25. Harhoff D, Stahl K, Woywode M (1998) Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms. Empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. J Ind Econ 46: 453–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart P (2000) Theories of firms’ growth and the generation of jobs. Rev Ind Org 17: 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helpman E, Krugman PR (1985) Market structure and foreign trade. increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Harvester Wheatsheaf, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  28. Huber P, Pfaffermayr M (2010) Testing for conditional convergence in variance and skewness: the firm size distribution revisited. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 72: 648–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee LF (2007) Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. J Econom 140: 333–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacDonald CJ (1998) The evolution of Intel’s copy EXACTLY! technology transfer method. Intel Technol J 98: 1–6Google Scholar
  32. Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60: 531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Markusen JR (1984) Multinationals, multi-plant economies and the gains from trade. J Int Econ 16: 205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markusen JR (2002) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Pennings E, Sleuwaegen L (2000) International relocation: firm and industry determinants. Econ Lett 67: 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Pfaffermayr M (2009) Conditional beta- and sigma-convergence in space: a maximum likelihood approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39: 63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slater M (1980) The managerial limitation to the growth of firms. Econ J 90: 520–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutton J (1997) Gibrat’s legacy. J Econ Lit 35: 40–59Google Scholar
  40. Variyam JN, Kraybill DS (1992) Empirical evidence on determinants of firm growth. Econ Lett 38: 31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social Sciences and Salzburg Centre of European Union Studies (SCEUS)University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  3. 3.Austrian Institute of Economic ResearchViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations