Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 945–958 | Cite as

The immigration surplus and the substitutability of immigrant and native labor: evidence from Spain

Article

Abstract

How immigration affects the labor market of the host country is a topic of major concern for many immigrant-receiving nations. Spain is no exception, as a consequence of the rapid increase in immigrant flows experienced over the past few decades. We assess the impact of immigration on Spanish natives’ incomes by estimating the net immigration surplus (IS) under the assumption of perfect and imperfect substitutabilities between immigrant and native labor of similar educational attainment. To address the imperfect substitutability between immigrant and native labor, we use information on the occupational distribution of immigrants and natives of similar educational attainment to learn about the equivalency of skilled immigrants to skilled and unskilled natives. The results show that the magnitude of the IS significantly rises with the degree of imperfect substitutability between immigrant and native labor.

Keywords

Immigration surplus Imperfect substitutes Occupational segregation Spain 

JEL Classification

J61 F22 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altonji J, Card D (1991) The effects of immigration on the labor market outcomes of less-skilled natives, NBER chapters. In: Immigration, trade and the labor market. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., pp 201–234Google Scholar
  2. Amuedo-Dorantes C, De la Rica S (2011) Complements or substitutes? Task specialization by gender and nativity in Spain. Labour Economics available at: doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2011.02.002
  3. Borjas G (1995) The economic benefits of immigration. J Econ Perspect 9(2): 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjas G (1999) The economic analysis of immigration. In: Ashenfelter O, Card DE (eds) Handbook of labor economics, chap. 28. 3A:1697–1760Google Scholar
  5. Borjas G (2003) The labor demand curve is downward sloping: reexamining the impacts of immigration on the labor market. Q J Econ 118: 1334–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card D (2001) Immigrant inflows, native outflows and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. J Labor Econ 19: 22–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Euwals R, Roodenburg H (2003) A note of the redistributive effect of immigration. IZA Discussion paper No. 917Google Scholar
  8. Farré L, Gonzalez L, Ortega F (2011) Immigration, family responsibilities and the labor supply of skilled native women. BE J Econ Anal Policy 11(1):34Google Scholar
  9. González-Enríque C (2009) Undocumented migration: counting the uncountable. Data and trends across Europe. Country report prepared under the research project CLANDESTINO undocumented migration: counting the uncountable. Data and trends across Europe, funded by the 6th framework programme for research and technological development under priority 7 citizens and governance in a knowledge-based society, Research DG, European Commission. Available at: http://clandestino.eliamep.gr
  10. Hidalgo-Pérez MA, O’kean-Alonso JM, Rodríguez López J (2008) Labor demand and information technologies: evidence for Spain 1980-2005, Working Paper Series, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, No. 08.12Google Scholar
  11. Hidalgo-Pérez MA, Rodr’iguez López J, O’Kean-Alonso JM (2009) Labor demand and information technologies: evidence for Spain 1980-2005, Working Paper, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  12. Manacorda M, Manning A, Wadsworth J (2006) The impact of immigration on the structure of male wages: theory and evidence from Britain, CEP Discussion Paper No. 754Google Scholar
  13. Ottaviano G, Peri G (2005) Rethinking the gains from immigration: theory and evidence from the U.S. NBER Working Paper # 11672Google Scholar
  14. Ottaviano G, Peri G (2010) Rethinking the gains from immigration on Wages. forthcoming in the J European Economic Association, 2011Google Scholar
  15. Peri G (2006) Immigrants complementarities and native Wages: evidence from California, Working Paper, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Peri G, Sparber C (2009) Task specialization, immigration and wages. Am Econ J Appl Econ 1(3): 135–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Welch F (1999) In defense of inequality. Am Econ Rev 89(2): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSan Diego State University, CReAM, FEDEA & IZASan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico IIUniversidad del País Vasco (UPV-EHU), CReAM, FEDEA & IZABasque countrySpain

Personalised recommendations