Abstract
The recent literature on the duration of trade has predominantly analyzed the determinants of trade flow durations using Cox proportional hazards models. The purpose of this article is to show why it is inappropriate to analyze the duration of trade with continuous-time models such as the Cox model, and to propose alternative discrete-time models which are more suitable for estimation. In brief, the Cox model has three major drawbacks when applied to large trade data sets. First, it faces problems in the presence of many tied duration times, leading to biased coefficient estimates and standard errors. Second, it is difficult to properly control for unobserved heterogeneity, which can lead to parameter bias and bias in the estimated survivor function. Third, the Cox model imposes the restrictive and empirically questionable assumption of proportional hazards. In contrast, with discrete-time models there is no problem handling ties; unobserved heterogeneity can be controlled for without difficulty; and the restrictive proportional hazards assumption can easily be bypassed. By replicating an influential study by Besedeš and Prusa (J Int Econ 70:339–358, 2006b), but employing discrete-time models as well as the original Cox model, we find empirical support for each of these arguments against the Cox model. Moreover, when comparing estimation results obtained from a Cox model and our preferred discrete-time specification, we find significant differences in both the predicted survivor functions and the estimated effects of explanatory variables on the hazard. In other words, the choice between models affects the economic conclusions that can be drawn.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2007) The unobserved heterogeneity distribution in duration analysis. Biometrika 94: 87–99
Allison PD (1982) Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociol Methodol 13: 61–98
Amemiya T (1981) Qualitative response models: a survey. J Econ Lit 19: 1483–1536
Baker M, Melino A (2000) Duration dependence and nonparametric heterogeneity: a Monte Carlo study. J Econometrics 96: 357–393
Besedeš T (2008) A search cost perspective on formation and duration of trade. Rev Int Econ 16: 835–849
Besedeš T, Prusa TJ (2006a) Ins, outs and the duration of trade. Can J Econ 39: 266–295
Besedeš T, Prusa TJ (2006b) Product differentiation and duration of US import trade. J Int Econ 70: 339–358
Besedeš T, Prusa TJ (2007) The role of extensive and intensive margins and export growth. NBER Working Paper No. 13628
Brenton P, Pierola MD, von Uexküll E (2009) The life and death of trade flows: understanding the survival rates of developing-country exporters. In: Newfarmer R, Shaw W, Walkenhorst P (eds) Breaking into new markets: emerging lessons for export diversification. The World Bank, Washington, pp 127–144
Brenton P, Saborowski C, von Uexküll E (2009) What explains the low survival rate of developing country export flows. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4951
Breslow N (1974) Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics 30: 89–99
Burr IW (1942) Cumulative frequency functions. Ann Math Stat 13: 215–232
Butler JS, Moffitt R (1982) A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one-factor multinomial probit model. Econometrica 50: 761–764
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34: 187–220
Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
Dolton P, van der Klaauw W (1995) Leaving teaching in the UK: a duration analysis. Econ J 105: 431–444
Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 72: 557–565
Fugazza M, Molina AC (2009) The determinants of trade survival. HEID Working Paper No. 05/2009
Görg H, Kneller R, Muraközy B (2007) What makes a successful export? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6614
Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52: 271–320
Hess W (2009) A flexible hazard rate model for grouped duration data. Working Paper No. 2009:18, Department of Economics, Lund University
Hsieh FY (1995) A cautionary note on the analysis of extreme data with Cox regression. Am Stat 49: 226–228
Jenkins SP (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford B Econ Stat 57: 129–137
Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York
Kauermann G, Tutz G, Brüderl J (2005) The survival of newly founded firms: a case-study into varying-coefficient models. J R Stat Soc Ser A 168: 145–158
Lancaster T (1979) Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment. Econometrica 47: 939–956
Lancaster T, Nickell S (1980) The analysis of re-employment probabilities for the unemployed. J R Stat Soc Ser A) 143: 141–165
Lechner M, Lollivier S, Magnac T (2008) Parametric binary choice models. In: Md́ftyd́fs L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data: fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–245
McCall BP (1994) Testing the proportional hazards assumption in the presence of unmeasured heterogeneity. J Appl Econom 9: 321–334
Meier L, van de Geer S, Bühlmann P (2008) The group lasso for logistic regression. J R Stat Soc Ser B 70: 53–71
Meyer BD (1990) Unemplyment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58: 757–782
Mroz TA, Zayats YV (2008) Arbitrarily normalized coefficients, information sets, and false reports of “biases” in binary outcome models. Rev Econ Stat 90: 406–413
Nicoletti C, Rondinelli C (2010) The (mis)specification of discrete duration models with unobserved heterogeneity: a Monte Carlo study. J Econometrics 159: 1–13
Nitsch V (2009) Die another day: duration in German import trade. Rev World Econ 145: 133–154
Ondrich J, Rhody SE (1999) Multiple spells in the Prentice-Gloeckler-Meyer likelihood with unobserved heterogeneity. Econ Lett 63: 139–144
Prentice RL (1975) Discrimination among some parametric models. Biometrika 62: 607–614
Prentice RL (1976) A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves. Biometrics 32: 761–768
Prentice RL, Gloeckler LA (1978) Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics 34: 57–67
Salant SW (1977) Search theory and duration data: a theory of sorts. Q J Econ 91: 39–57
Scheike TH, Sun Y (2007) Maximum likelihood estimation for tied survival data under Cox regression model via Em-algorithm. Lifetime Data Anal 13: 399–420
Schoenfeld D (1982) Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 69: 239–241
Singer JD, Willett JB (1993) It’s about time: using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J Educ Stat 18: 155–195
Sueyoshi GT (1995) A class of binary response models for grouped duration data. J Appl Econom 10: 411–431
Tadikamalla PR (1980) A look at the Burr and related distributions. Int Stat Rev 48: 337–344
Train KE (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Trussell J, Richards T (1985) Correcting for unmeasured heterogeneity in hazard models using the Heckman-Singer procedure. Sociol Methodol 15: 242–276
van den Berg GJ (2001) Duration models: specification, identification, and multiple durations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 5. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3381–3460
Vaupel JW, Yashin AI (1985) Heterogeneity’s ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat 39: 176–185
Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16: 439–454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hess, W., Persson, M. The duration of trade revisited. Empir Econ 43, 1083–1107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0518-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0518-4
Keywords
- Duration of trade
- Continuous-time versus discrete-time hazard models
- Proportional hazards
- Unobserved heterogeneity