Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In economic development, aggregate economic growth is accompanied by structural change among the three main sectors of an economy. Nevertheless, the question whether economic growth causes structural change, or changes in the economic structure cause aggregate growth is still unanswered. To shed more light on this question, this article examines a Granger causality test in a panel environment to determine the relationship of economic growth and structural change, measured either in terms of employment shares or real value added shares. Estimation and analysis of the annual data of seven OECD countries, covering the period from 1960–2004, show that although the causality appears to be heterogeneous among these countries, some general conclusions can be drawn. Aggregate economic growth decelerates structural change in the very short run but accelerates it with some lag in time. The aggregate effect depends on whether structural change is measured in terms of employment or in terms of real value added. Conversely, structural change supports aggregate economic growth, irrespective of which measure of structural change chosen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion Ph, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2): 323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn SC, Schmidt P (1995) Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. J Econom 68: 5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger K (2001) Speed of change and growth of manufacturing. In: Peneder M, Aiginer K, Marterbauer M (eds) Structural change and economic growth. Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Vienna, pp 53–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1982) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J Am Stat Assoc 76: 589–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari MI (1992) Growth effects of recent structural changes in the Canadian economy: some empirical evidence. Appl Econ 24: 1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Ng S (2004) A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72: 1127–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data. 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Bresson G, Pirotte A (2007) Panel unit root tests and spatial dependence. J Appl Econ 22: 339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57: 415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Batey Blackman SA, Wolff EN (1985) Unbalanced growth revisited: asymptotic stagnancy and new evidence. Am Econ Rev 75: 806–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz J (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Political Sci Rev 89: 634–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz J (2009) Modeling dynamics in time-series–cross-section political economy data. Social science working paper 1304

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87: 115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonatti L, Felice G (2008) Endogenous growth and changing sectoral composition in advanced economies. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19: 109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (eds) Advances in econometrics, vol 15: nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp 161–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Stat Neerl 59: 414–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2008) Testing for unit roots in panels with factor structure. Econom Theory 24: 88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Pesaran MH (2008) Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In: Mátyás L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data: fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (3rd ed.), volume 46 of advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics, Chap 9. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 279–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Park JY, Song K (2006) Bootstrapping cointegrating regressions. J Econom 133: 703–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe JI (2003) Do foreign direct investment and gross domestic investment promote economic growth?. Rev Dev Econ 7: 44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance 20: 249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C (1957) The conditions of economic progress. 3rd edn. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis DCA, Murthy KSR (1998) Economic growth and restructuring: a test of unbalanced growth models 1977–1992. Appl Econ Lett 5: 777–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich A (2009) Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries. Jena economic research papers in economics 2009-034

  • Dietrich A, Krüger JJ (2010a) Long-run sectoral development: time series evidence for the German economy. Struct Change Econ Dyn 21: 111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich A, Krüger JJ (2010b) Numerical explorations of the Ngai-Pissarides model of growth and structural change. Darmstadt discussion papers in economics 199

  • Driver C, Saw ChW (1996) Performance of structural change indices: analysis using real and simulated data. Appl Econ Lett 3: 187–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria C (1997) Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. Int Econ Rev 38: 431–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G, Rothenberg ThJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64: 813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdil E, Yetkiner IH (2004) A panel data approach for income-health causality. FNU-47

  • Fisher AGB (1939) Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Econ Rec 15: 22–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher AGB (1952) A note on tertiary production. Econ J 62: 820–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foelmi R, Zweimüller J (2008) Structural change, Engel’s consumption cycles and Kaldor’s facts of economic growth. J Monet Econ 55: 1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourastié J (1949/1969) Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siècle: Progrès Technique., Progrès Économique, Progrès Social, 1949. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. German edition: Die große Hoffnung des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, 2nd ed. 1969. Bund-Verlag, Köln

  • Gengenbach C, Palm FC, Urbain JP (2006) Panel unit root tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependencies: comparison and implications for modelling. METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Gengenbach C, Palm FC, Urbain JP (2010) Panel unit root tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependencies: comparison and implications for modelling. Econom Rev 29: 111–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis. 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58: 43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Rand J (2006) On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Econ 29: 21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2006) Penn world table version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW (1985) Statistics and causal inference. J Amer Stat Assoc 81: 945–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H (1985) Implementing causality tests with panel data, with an example from local public finance. NBER Technical Paper Series 48

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56: 1371–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlin C, Venet B (2001) Granger causality tests in panel data models with fixed coefficients. University Paris IX, Miméo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlin C (2004a) Testing Granger causality in heterogeneous panel data models with fixed coefficients. University Orléans, Miméo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlin C (2004b) A note on causality tests in panel data models with random coefficients. University Orléans, Miméo

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115: 53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CI (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. J Political Econ 103: 759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CI (1999) Growth: with or without scale effects. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 89: 139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judson RA, Owen AL (1999) Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Econ Lett 65: 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviet JF (1995) On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 68: 53–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongsamut P, Rebelo S, Xie D (2001) Beyond balanced growth. Rev Econ Stud 68: 869–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krengel R, Filip D (1981) Die Messung des gesamtwirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels. In: DIW (ed) Abschwächen der Wachstumsimpulse— Analyse der strukturellen Entwicklung der deutschen Wirtschaft. Materialband 1 zur Strukturberichterstattung 1980, Berlin, pp 1–17

  • Krüger JJ (2008a) Productivity and structural change: a review of the literature. J Econ Surv 22: 330–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger JJ (2008b) Productivity dynamics and structural change in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Ind Corp Chang 17: 875–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien DM (1982) Sectoral shifts and cyclical unemployment. J Political Econ 90: 777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22: 3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 631–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meckl J (2002) Structural change and generalized balanced growth. J Econ 77: 241–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaely M (1962) Concentration in international trade. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller J (2001) Income and price elasticities in different sectors of the economy: an analysis of structural change for Germany, the UK and the USA. In: Raa Th, Schettkat R (eds) The growth of service industries. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 167–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon HR, Perron B (2004) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. J Econom 122: 81–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JH (1978) A measure of structural change in output. Rev Income Wealth 1: 105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair-Reichert U, Weinhold D (2001) Causality tests for cross-country panels: a new look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 63: 153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai LR, Pissarides CA (2007) Structural change in a multi-sector model of growth. Am Econ Rev 97: 429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49: 1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2008) Baumol’s diseases: a macroeconomic perspective. Contrib Macroecon 8: 1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY (2003) Bootstrap unit root tests. Econometrica 71: 1845–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti L (1981) Structural change and economic growth—a theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelka GW (2005) Wachstum und Strukturwandel. Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran HM (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econom 22: 265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran HM, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogenous panels. J Econom 68: 79–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Political Econ 94: 1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Political Econ 98, no. 5. Part 2: the problem of development: a conference of the institute for the study of free enterprise systems, pp S71–S103

  • Rowthorn R, Ramaswami R (1999) Growth, trade and deindustrialization. IMF Staff Pap 46(1): 18–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P, Pyka A (2004a) Economic development by the creation of new sectors. J Evol Econ 14: 1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P, Pyka A (2004b) Economic development, qualitative change and employment creation. Struct Change Econ Dynam 15: 265–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P, Pyka A (2004c) Economic development, variety and employment. Rev Econ 55: 1023–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P, Pyka A (2008) Micro and macro dynamics: industry life cycles, inter-sector coordination and aggregate growth. J Evol Econ 18: 167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P, Pyka A (2010) The co-evolution of innovation, demand and growth. Presented at the ISS conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 21–24 June

  • Schatz KW (1974) Wachstum und Strukturwandel der westdeutschen Wirtschaft im internationalen Verbund – Analysen und Prognosen, Kieler Studien 128. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavo-Campo S (1978) The simple measurement of structural change: a note. Econ Rec 54: 261–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EG, Teixeira AAC (2008) Surveying structural change: seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19: 273–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. In: Campbell RH, Skinner AS, Todd WB (eds) Reprinted in 2 vols. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70: 65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39: 312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamer M (1998) Interrelation between subsidies, structural change and economic growth in Germany, a vector autoregressive analysis. Konjunkturpolit 44: 231–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamer M (1999) Strukturwandel und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in Deutschland, den USA und Japan. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoikov V (1966) Some determinants of the level of frictional unemployment: a comparative study. Int Labour Rev 93: 530–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Sul D (2009) Panel unit root tests under cross section dependence with recursive mean adjustment. Econ Lett 105: 123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer M, O’Mahony M, van Ark B (2007) The EU KLEMS growth and productivity accounts: an overview. University of Groningen & University of Birmingham, Groningen. http://www.euklems.net

  • Turgot ARJ (1766) Reflections on the formation and the distribution of wealth. In: Meek RL (eds) Turgot on Progress, sociology and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–134

  • van Ark B (1996) Sectoral growth accounting and structural change in post-war Europe. In: van Ark B, Crafts NFR (eds) Quantitative aspects of post-war European economic growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 84–164. http://www.ggdc.net/10-sector.shtml

  • Weinhold D (1996) Investment, growth and causality testing in panels. Econ Previs 126: 163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold D (2004) A dynamic ‘fixed effects model’ for heterogeneous panel data. EconWPA

  • Wolfe M (1955) The concept of economic sectors. Q J Econ 69: 402–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Law and Economics, Darmstadt University of Technology, Marktplatz 15, 64283, Darmstadt, Germany

    Andreas Dietrich

Authors
  1. Andreas Dietrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Dietrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietrich, A. Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries. Empir Econ 43, 915–944 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0510-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0510-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation