Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Firms’ human capital, R&D and innovation: a study on French firms

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the effects of human capital and technological capital on innovation. While the role of technological capital as measured by research and development (R&D) expenditure has been intensively investigated, few studies have been made on the effect of employee training on innovation. This article explores the relationship between innovation and firm employee training. Our methodological approach contributes to the literature in three ways. We propose various indicators of firm employee training. We build a count data panel with a long time-data series to deal with the issue of firms’ heterogeneity. We propose a dynamic analysis. Using dynamic count data models on French industrial firms over the period 1986–1992, we find positive and significant effects of R&D intensity and training on patenting activity. Whatever the indicators of training our results show that the firm employee training has a positive impact on technological innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambrige, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballot G, Fakhfakh F, Taymaz E (1998) Formation continue, recherche et développement et performance des entreprises. Form Empl 64: 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballot G, Fakhfakh F, Taymaz E (2001) Firms’ human capital, R&D and performance: a study on french and swedish firms. Labour Econ 8(64): 443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel AP (1994) Productivity gains from the implementation of employee training programs. Ind Relat 33(4): 411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel AP (2004) Human resource management and organizational performance: evidence from retail banking. Ind Labor Relat Rev 57(2): 181–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G (1962) Investment in human capital: a theorical analysis. J Political Econ 70: 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J, Spiegel MM (1994) The role of human capital in economic developement: evidence from aggregate cross-country data. J Monet Econ 70: 143–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1995) Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econ J 105(429): 333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Griffith R, Windmeijer F (2002) Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. J Econom 108(1): 113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth A, Snower D (1996) Acquiring skills, market failures, their symptoms and policy responses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carriou Y, Jeger F (1997) La formation continue dans les entreprises et son retour sur investissement. Econ Stat 303: 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain G (1992) Comment: sequential moment restrictions in panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 10: 20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincera M (1997) Patents, R&D and spillovers at the firm level: some evidence from econometric count models for panel data. J Appl Econ 12(3): 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1): 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cokburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J Ind Econ 46(2): 157–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon B, Duguet E (1997) Estimating the innovation function from patent numbers: Gmm on count panel data. J Appl Econom 12(3): 243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon B, Duguet E, Kabla I (1996) Schumpeterian conjectures: a moderate support from various innovation measures. In: Kleinknecht AH (eds) Determinants of innovation: the message from new indicators. Mc Millan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crépon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J (2000) Mesurer le rendement de l’innovation. Econ Stat 334(4): 65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguet E, Greenan N (1997) Le biais technologique: une analyse econometrique sur donnees individuelles. Rev Econ 48(5): 1061–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguet E, Kabla I (1998) Appropriation strategy and the use of the patent system: an econometric analysis at the firm level in french manufacturing. Ann d’Econ Stat 49(50): 290–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguet E, Monjon S (2002) Les fondements microeconomiques de la persistance de l’innovation: une analyse econometrique. Rev Econ 53(3): 625–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Englander AS, Evenson R, Hanazaki M (1988) R&D, innovation and the total factor productivity slowdown. OECD Econ Stud 11: 8–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(1): 1661–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurmu S, Pérez-Sebastián F (2008) Patents, R&D and lag effects: evidence from flexible methods for count panel data on manufacturing firms. Empir Econ 35(3): 507–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4): 909–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriate the returns from industrial R&D. Brook Pap Econ Act 3(3): 783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lööf H, Heshmati A (2002) Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study. Int J Prod Econ 70(3): 61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1993) Studies in human capital. Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohnen P, Therrien P (2002) How innovative are canadian firms compared to some european firms? A comparative look at innovation surveys. Technovation 3: 231–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Phelps E (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 2(3): 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes A, Griliches Z (1984) Estimating distributed lags in short panels with an application to the specification of depreciation patterns and capital stock constructs. Technical Report 0933, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Pfeiffer B (1997) Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, vol 30, chap Determinanten von Erwerbschancen und Arbeitslosigkeitsrisiko im ostdeutschen Transformationsprozeß

  • Rogers M (2004) Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Bus Econ 22(2): 141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer FM (1965a) Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented invention. Am Econ Rev 55(5): 1097–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer FM (1965b) Size of firm, oligopoly and research: a comment. Can J Econ Political Sci 31(2): 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella F (1998) Estimating models with sample selection bias: a survey. J Hum Resour 33(1): 127–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diègo Legros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallié, EP., Legros, D. Firms’ human capital, R&D and innovation: a study on French firms. Empir Econ 43, 581–596 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0506-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation