Skip to main content
Log in

Did monetary or technology shocks move euro area stock prices?

Evidence on the boom–bust cycle of 1995–2003

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a Bayesian vector autoregressive (VAR) model, I investigate the impact of monetary and technology shocks on the euro area stock market. I find an important role for technology surprise shocks, but not monetary shocks, in explaining variations in real stock prices. Specifically, the pronounced boom–bust cycle of 1995–2003 is largely due to technology surprise shocks. The identification method allows me to study the effects of technology news shocks. The responses are consistent with the idea that news on technology improvements has an immediate impact on stock prices. These findings are robust to several modelling choices, including the productivity measure, the specification of the VAR model, and the identifying restrictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves N, de Brito JB, Gomes S, Sousa J (2011) The transmission of monetary policy and technology shocks in the euro area. Appl Econ 43(8): 917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni I, Ehrmann M (2003) Monetary transmission in the euro area: early evidence. Econ Policy 18: 469–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Fernald JG, Kimball MS (2006) Are technology improvements contractionary. Am Econ Rev 96(5): 1418–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry P, Portier F (2006) Stock prices, news, and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 96(4): 1293–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Watson M (1997) Monetary policy and the effects of oil price shocks. In: Brookings Pap Econ Act 1997(1):91–157

  • Canova F, De Nicoló G (2002) Monetary disturbances matter for business fluctuations in the G-7. J Monet Econ 49: 1131–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL (1999) Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end? In: Woodford M, Taylor JB (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, North-Holland, pp 65–148

  • Dedola L, Neri S (2007) What does a technology shock do? A VAR analysis with model-based sign restrictions. J Monet Econ 54: 512–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders Z, Müller G, Scholl A (2008) How do fiscal and technology shocks affect real exchange rates? New evidence for the United States, CFS Working Paper No. 2008/22

  • Evans CL (1992) Productivity shocks and real business cycles. J Monet Econ 29: 191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust J (1998) The robustness of identified VAR conlusions about money. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 49: 207–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez RB (1981) A methodological note on the estimation of time series. Rev Econ Stat 63(3): 471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JDM (2006) The dynamic effects of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks. J Polit Econ 114(3): 413–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis N, Ramey VA (2005) Is the technology-driven real business cycle hypothesis dead? Shocks and aggregate fluctuations revisited. J Monet Econ 52: 1379–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis NR, Owyang MT, Theodorou AT (2003) The use of long-run restrictions for the identification of technology shocks, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review November/December

  • Francis N, Owyang MT, Roush JE (2005) A flexible finite-horizon identification of technology shocks, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers Number 832

  • Fry R, Pagan A (2007) Some issues in using sign restrictions for identifying structural VARs, NCER Working Paper No. 14

  • Galí J (1999) Technology, employment, and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 89(1): 249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RE (1988) The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. J Polit Econ 96(5): 921–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1996) This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. J Monet Econ 38: 215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover KD, Perez SJ (1994) Post hoc ergo propter once more: an evaluation of ‘Does monetary policy matter?’ in the spirit of James Tobin. J Monet Econ 34: 47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian L, Murphy D (2009) Why agnostic sign restrictions are not enough: understanding the dynamics of oil market VAR models, manuscript, University of Michigan

  • Lastrapes WD (1998) International evidence on equity prices, interest rates and money. J Int Money Finance 17: 377–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojon B, Peersman G (2003) A VAR description of the effects of monetary policy in the individual countries of the euro area. In: Angeloni I, Kashyap A, Mojon B (eds) Monetary policy transmission in the euro area. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mountford A, Uhlig H (2009) What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks. J Appl Econ 24: 960–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri S (2004) Monetary policy and stock prices: theory and evidence, Working Paper Bank of Italy, No. 513

  • O’Mahoney M, Timmer MP (2009) Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: the EU KLEMS database. Econ J 119: 374–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peersman G (2004) The transmission of monetary policy in the euro area: are the effects different across countries. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 3: 285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peersman G (2005) What caused the early millenium slowdown? Evidence based on vector autoregressions. J Appl Econ 20: 185–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peersman G, Smets F (2003) The monetary transmission mechanism in the euro area: more evidence from VAR analysis. In: Angeloni I, Kashyap A, Mojon B (eds) Monetary policy transmission in the euro area. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 36–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peersman G, Straub R (2009) Technology shocks and robust sign restrictions in a euro area SVAR. Int Econ Rev 50(3): 727–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapach DE (2001) Macro shocks and real stock prices. J Econ Bus 53: 5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Ramirez JF, Waggoner DF, Zha T (2010) Structural vector autoregressions: theory of identification and algorithms for inference. Rev Econ Stud 77: 665–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl A, Uhlig H (2008) New evidence on the puzzles: results from agnostic identification on monetary policy and exchange rates. J Int Econ 76(1): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondermann D, Bohl MT, Siklos PL (2009) The euro area stock market channel: does one size fit all. Finance Res Lett 6: 230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlig H (1994) What macroeconomists should know about unit roots: a Bayesian perspective. Econ Theory 10: 645–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlig H (2004) Do technology shocks lead to a fall in total hours worked. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(2-3): 361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlig H (2005) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure. J Monet Econ 52: 381–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Oliver Berg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, T.O. Did monetary or technology shocks move euro area stock prices?. Empir Econ 43, 693–722 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0497-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0497-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation