Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric causality tests with an application

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that there are several logical reasons for the existence of asymmetric causal effects that need to be taken into account but usually are neglected in the literature. It suggests allowing for asymmetry in the causality testing by using the cumulative sums of positive and negative shocks. A bootstrap simulation approach with leverage adjustment is used to generate critical values that are robust to non-normality and time-varying volatility. An application to the efficient market hypothesis in the UAE is provided. The results show that the equity market is informationally efficient with regard to the oil shocks regardless if these shocks are positive or negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham A, Seyyed F, Alsakran S (2002) Testing the random walk behavior and efficiency of the gulf stock markets. Financ Rev 37: 469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84: 485–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khazali O, Ding D, Pyun SC (2007) A new variance ratio test of random walk in emerging markets: a revisit. Financ Rev 42: 303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Ramirez J, Rodriguez E, Echeverria JC (2009) A DFA approach for assessing asymmetric correlations. Physica A 388: 2263–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang A, Chen J (2002) Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios. J Financ Econ 63: 443–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelier L (1900) Theory of speculation. Gauthier-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Buguk C, Brorsen B (2003) Testing weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Int Rev Financ Anal 12: 579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajueiro D, Gogas P, Tabak B (2009) Does financial market liberalization increase the degree of market efficiency? The case of the Athens stock exchange. Int Rev Financ Anal 18: 50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles A (1933) Can stock market forecasters forecast?. Econometrica 1: 309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles A (1944) Stock market forecasting. Econometrica 12: 206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1999) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik JA, Hansen H (2008) An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70: 927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1965) The behaviour of stock prices. J Bus 55: 201–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Financ 25: 383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. J Financ Econ 49: 283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW, Yoon G (2002) Hidden cointegration. Department of Economics Working Paper. University of California, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker RS, Hatemi-J A (2005) A multivariate test for ARCH effects. Appl Econ Lett 12(7): 411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker RS, Hatemi-J A (2006) Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application. Appl Econ 38(13): 1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker RS, Hatemi-J A (2009) MV-ARCH: GAUSS module to implement the multivariate ARCH test. Statistical Software Components. Nr. G00009, Boston College Department of Economics

  • Hatemi-J A (2003) A new method to choose optimal lag order in stable and unstable VAR models. Appl Econ Lett 10(3): 135–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J A (2004a) Is the equity market informationally efficient in Japan?. Int Econ 16(3): 427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J A (2004b) Multivariate tests for autocorrelation in stable and unstable VAR models. Econ Model 21(4): 661–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J A (2008) Forecasting properties of a new method to choose optimal lag order in stable and unstable VAR models. Appl Econ Lett 15(4): 239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry ÓT, Olekalns N (2002) Does the Australian dollar real exchange rate display mean reversion. J Int Money Financ 21: 651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y, Zhou G (2008) Asymmetries in stock returns: statistical test and economic evaluation. Rev Financ Stud 20: 1547–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim MH, Aziz H (2003) Macroeconomic variables and the Malaysian equity market: a view through rolling subsamples. J Econ Stud 30(1): 6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim K, Kim J (2008) Financial crisis and stock market efficiency: empirical evidence from Asian countries. Int Rev Financ Anal 17: 571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo AW (1997) Fat tails, long memory, and the stock market since the 1960s. Econ Notes 2: 213–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo A, MacKinlay C (1988) Stock market prices do not follow random walks: evidence from a simple specification test. Rev Financ Stud 1: 41–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longin F, Solnik B (2001) Extreme correlation of international equity markets. J Financ 56: 649–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel BG (2003) The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. J Econ Perspect 17: 59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1966) Forecasts of future prices, unbiased markets and martingale models. J Bus 39: 242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyler A (2009) The pass through of oil prices into euro area consumer liquid fuel prices in an environment of high and volatile oil prices. Energy Econ 31: 867–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron N (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6): 1519–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojah K, Karemera D (1999) Random walks and market efficiency tests of Latin American emerging equity markets: a revisit. Financ Rev 34: 57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Ind Manag Rev 6: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims C (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1973) Job market signalling. Q J Econ 87: 355–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (1974) Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping. Rev Econ Stud 41: 219–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 66: 225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulnasser Hatemi-J.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatemi-J, A. Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empir Econ 43, 447–456 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation