Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The nature of regional unemployment in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking as a starting point the evidence of growing disparities for most of the 1984–2007 period, this article investigates the nature of regional unemployment in Italy. In particular, we assess whether the Italian regional unemployment rates contain a unit root and are, thus, subject to pure hysteresis, considering as alternative hypotheses both a linear and a non-linear stationary process. For that purpose, we employ three recently developed panel unit-root tests, taking account of structural breaks, cross-section dependence and non-linearities. Contrary to previous studies in the literature, our results reject the pure hysteresis hypothesis and support the characterisation of regional unemployment in Italy as a stationary but non-linear process, subject to multiple equilibria, in line with the ‘structuralist hypothesis’ advanced by Phelps (1994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram QF (2005) Multiple unemployment equilibria and asymmetric dynamics—Norwegian evidence. Struct Change Econ Dyn 16: 263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amable B, Henry J, Lordon F, Topol R (1995) Hysteresis revisited: a methodological approach. In: Cross R (eds) The natural rate of unemployment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsler C, Lee J (1995) An LM test for a unit-root in the presence of a structural change. Econom Theory 11: 359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis P, Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal I (1999) Unit roots and structural breaks in OECD unemployment. Econ Lett 65: 149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Carrion-i-Silvestre JL (2004) Structural changes, common stochastic trends, and unit roots in panel data. DOCT. AQR. Departament d’Econometria, Estadística i Economia Espanyola. Universitat de Barcelona

  • Bai J, Ng S (2004) A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72: 1127–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Lumsdaine RL, Stock JH (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit-root and trend-break hypotheses: theory and international evidence. J Bus Econ Stat 10: 271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A., Marcellino M, Osbat C (2005) Testing for PPP: should we use panel methods?. Empir Econ 30: 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean C (1992) European unemployment: a survey. Centre for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper 71

  • Blanchard O, Katz L (1992) Regional evolutions. Brook Pap Econ Act 1: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Summers LH (1986) Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroecon Annu 1: 15–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Summers LH (1987) Hysteresis in unemployment. Eur Econ Rev 31: 288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Stat Neerl 59: 414–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Das S (2008) Testing for unit roots in panels with a factor structure. Econom Theory 24: 88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J, Pesaran MH (2008) Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In: Matyas L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data: fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 279–322

  • Brunello G, Lupi C, Ordine P (2000) Regional disparities and the Italian NAIRU. Oxf Econ Pap 52: 146–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello G, Lupi C, Ordine P (2001) Widening differences in Italian regional unemployment. Labour Econ 8: 103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarero M, Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, Tamarit C (2006) Testing for hysteresis in unemployment in OECD countries. New evidence using stationarity panel tests with breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 68: 167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato M, de Peretti C, Sarantis N (2008) A nonlinear panel unit root test under cross section dependence. Working Paper 2008_08, Department of Economics, University of Glasgow

  • Chang Y (2002) Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. J Econom 110: 261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell D, Peel DA (1998) A note on some properties of the ESTAR model. Econ Lett 60: 311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20: 249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2006) Nonstationary panels. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbooks of econometrics, vol 1. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 511–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi I, Chue TK (2007) Subsampling hypothesis tests for nonstationary panels with applications to exchange rates and stock prices. J Appl Econom 22: 233–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decressin J, Fatás A (1995) Regional labor market dynamics in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 39: 1627–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B (1993) Labour markets and European monetary unification. In: Masson P, Taylor M (eds) Policy issues in the operation of currency unions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1968) The role of monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 58: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson M, Österholm P (2006) Hysteresis and nonlinearities in unemployment rates. Appl Econ Lett 13: 545–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Lee J, Tieslau M (2005) Panel LM unit-root tests with level shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 67: 393–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115: 53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2003) Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. J Econom 112: 359–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment, macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • León-Ledesma MA (2002) Unemployment hysteresis in the US states and the EU. Bull Econ Res 54: 95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León-Ledesma MA, McAdam P (2004) Unemployment, hysteresis and transition. Scott J Political Econ 51: 377–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen R, Saikkonen P, Teräsvirta T (1988) Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrica 75: 491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine R, Papell D (1997) Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Rev Econ Stat 79: 212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61 (Special Issue): 631–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon RH, Perron B (2004) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. J Econom 122: 81–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Papell DH (2000) Testing for unit Roots in panels in the presence of structural change with an application to OECD unemployment. In: Baltagi BH (eds) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels (Advances in econometrics 15). JAI Press, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, pp 223–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. J Monet Econ 10: 139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron P (1995) Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection for the truncation lag. J Am Stat Assoc 90: 268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papell DH, Murray CJ, Ghiblawi H (2000) The structure of unemployment. Rev Econ Stat 82: 309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econom 22: 265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps ES (1967) Phillips curves, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time. Economica 34: 254–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps ES (1968) Money-wage dynamics and labor market equilibrium. J Political Econ 76: 678–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps ES (1972) Inflation policy and unemployment theory. WW Norton and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps ES (1994) Structural slumps: the modern equilibrium theory of unemployment, interest and assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps ES, Zoega G (1998) Natural-rate theory and OECD unemployment. Econ J 108: 782–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econom J 6: 217–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røed K (1997) Hysteresis in unemployment. J Econ Surv 11: 389–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P, Phillips PCB (1992) LM tests for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 54: 257–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LV, Leybourne S, Kim T-H, Newbold P (2004) More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. J Appl Econom 19: 147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song FM, Wu Y (1997) Hysteresis in unemployment: evidence from 48 states. Econ Enq 35: 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock JH, Watson MW (1997) The NAIRU, unemployment and monetary policy. J Econ Perspect 11: 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH (1999) A class of tests for integration and cointegration. In: Engle RF, White H (eds) Cointegration, causality and forecasting: a festchrift in honour of Clive W. F. Granger. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 135–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivellato U (1993) La conta dei disoccupati: evidenze e interrogativi dalle nuove stime della rilevazione sulle forze di lavoro. Rassegna di Statistiche del Lavoro 1: 85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilanci V (2008) Are unemployment rates nonstationary or nonlinear? Evidence from 19 OECD countries. Econ Bull 3: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica, Matematica e Sociologia “V. Pareto”, Università degli Studi di Messina, Via T. Cannizzaro 278, 98122, Messina, Italy

    Matteo Lanzafame

Authors
  1. Matteo Lanzafame
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Lanzafame.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lanzafame, M. The nature of regional unemployment in Italy. Empir Econ 39, 877–895 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0331-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0331-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation