Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Q-theory of investment and earnings retentions—evidence from Scandinavia

Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

In a frictionless milieu, retentions should have no impact on investment behavior. Empirical studies, however, typically find that retentions are an important determinant of investment. Managerial discretion and financial constraints are two alternative explanations that have been suggested. This article uses a panel of listed Scandinavian firms to examine the importance of earnings retentions as a determinant of investment. Measures of Tobin’s Q, marginal q, and sales accelerator are used to control for investment opportunities. Scandinavian firms are found to depend on earnings retentions to a high degree, more so than in other developed economies. This high dependence on retentions suggests that the Scandinavian capital markets are suffering from allocational inefficiencies. This can be assumed to have detrimental effects on the speed of structural change. Moreover, these market frictions appear too large to per se be caused by information asymmetries or managerial discretion phenomena. Possible institutional explanations are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assarsson B, Berg C, Jansson P (2004) Investment in Swedish manufacturing: analysis and forecasts. Empir Econ 29: 261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Heim P, Malkiel BG, Quandt RE (1970) Earnings retentions, new capital and the growth of the firm. Rev Econ Stat 52: 345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle AA, Means G (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1996) The financial accelerator and the flight to quality. Rev Econ Stat 1: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B, Gertler M (1989) Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 79: 14–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard WC, Tobin J (1968) Pitfalls in financial model building. Am Econ Rev 58: 99–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko SR (1993) Business fixed investments spending: modeling strategies, empirical results and policy implications. J Econ Lit 31: 1875–1911

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccolo J, Fromm G (1979) “q” and the theory of investment. J Finance 34: 535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry SJ (1958) Business cycles and economic growth. MacGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund JE (2009) Corporate governance in Scandinavia: ownership concentration and dual-class equity structure. In: Bjuggren P-O, Mueller DC (ed) (2009) The modern firm, corporate governance and investment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Ericksom T, Whited TM (2000) Measurement error and the relationship between investment and “q”. J Polit Econ 108: 1027–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari SM, Hubbard GR, Petersen B (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brook Pap Econ Act 19: 141–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher I (1933) The debt-deflation theory of the great depression. Econometrica 5: 337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JK (1967) The new industrial state. Hamish Hamilton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski H, Mueller DC (1975) Life-cycle effects on corporate returns on retentions. Rev Econ Stat 57: 400–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski H, Mueller DC (1972) Managerial and shareholder welfare models of firm expenditures. Rev Econ Stat 54: 9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald B, Stiglitz J, Weiss A (1984) Financial market imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 74: 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugler K, Mueller DC, Yurtoglu BB (2004) Marginal q, Tobin’s q, cash flow and investment. South Econ J 70: 512–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal q and average q:. Neoclass Interpret Econom 50: 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson M, Jakobsson U (2001) Where schumpeter was nearly right – the Swedsih model and capitalism, socialism and democracy. J Evol Econ 11: 331–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T, Kashyap A, Scharfstein D (1991) Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Q J Econ 106: 33–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RG (1998) Capital-market imperfections and investments. J Econ Lit 36: 193–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber P (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Högfeldt P (2004) The history and politics of corporate ownership in Sweden. NBER working paper 10641

  • Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76: 323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm; managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3: 305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW (1963) Capital theory and investments behavior. Am Econ Rev 56: 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW (1971) Econometric studies of investment behavior: a survey. J Econ Lit 9: 1111–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Sibert C (1968) A comparison of alternative theories of investment behaviour. Am Econ Rev 58: 681–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. Q J Econ 112: 169–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria R, Mueller DC (1995) Investments and cash flow: asymmetric information or managerial discretion. Empirica 22: 211–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh E, Meyer RJ (1957) The investment decision: an empirical study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Miller M (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48: 261–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Miller M (1961) Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. J Bus 34: 411–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (1972) A life cycle theory of the firm. J Ind Econ 20: 199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (2003) The corporation—investments, mergers, and growth. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC, Reardon E (1993) Rates of return on corporate investments. South Econ J 60: 430–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13: 187–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller H (1993) Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints and Canadian investment. Can J Econ 26: 552–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism socialism, and democracy. George Allen & Urwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (1991) Taxation and the cost of capital: the ‘old’ view, the ‘new’ view and another view. NBER Working paper 3501

  • Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71: 393–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (1969) A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J Money Credit Banking 1: 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ratio Institute and Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Box 2303, 103 64, Stockholm, Sweden

    Johan E. Eklund

Authors
  1. Johan E. Eklund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan E. Eklund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eklund, J.E. Q-theory of investment and earnings retentions—evidence from Scandinavia. Empir Econ 39, 793–813 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0323-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0323-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

search

Navigation