Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to find factors affecting privatization decisions. This study investigates the determinants of privatization by applying the probit model for a data set of special public corporations in Japan. In December 2001, the Japanese government made a resolution to consider the privatization of special public corporations, evaluating 74 special public corporations for possible privatization. In the empirical analysis on the determinants of privatization, we find that among several factors affecting privatization decisions, two are important—the market condition factor and the policy/regulation factor. As for market conditions, a public corporation which exists in a commercialized industry is about 20% more likely to be privatized than others. As for the policy and regulation factor, the public corporation’s privatization under a single regulator is about 25% more likely, compared with the public corporation’s privatization under multiple regulators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arin KP, Okten C (2003) The determinants of privatization prices: evidence from Turkey. Appl Econ 35(12): 1393–1404
Biglaiser G, Brown DS (2003) The determinants of privatization in Latin America. Political Res Q 56(1): 77–89
Brandt L, Li H, Roberts J (2005) Banks and enterprise privatization in China. J Law Econ Organ 21(2): 524–546
Boehmer E, Nash RC, Netter JM (2005) Bank privatization in developing and developed countries: cross-sectional evidence on the impact of economic and political factors. J Bank Finance 29(8/9): 1981–2013
Bortolotti B, Siniscalco D (2004) The challenges of privatization: an international analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bortolotti B, Fantini M, Siniscalco D (2003) Privatization around the world: evidence from panel data. J Public Econ 88(1/2): 305–332
De Castro J, Uhlenbruck K (1997) Characteristics of privatization: evidence from developed, less- developed, and former communist countries. J Int Bus Stud 28(1): 123–143
Dewenter KL, Malatesta PM (1997) Public offerings of state-owned and privately-owned enterprises: an international comparison. J Finance 52(4): 1659–1679
D’Souza J, Megginson W, Nash R (2005) Effect of institutional and firm-specific characteristics on post-privatization performance: evidence from developed countries. J Corp Finance 11(5): 747–766
Goel RK, Budak J (2006) Privatization in transition economies: privatization scale and country size. Econ Syst 30(1): 98–110
Greene WH (1997) Econometric analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Kodrzycki YK (1998) Fiscal pressures and the privatization of local sevices. N Engl Econ Rev January/February: 39–50
Li H (2003) Government’s budget constraint, competition, and privatization: evidence from China’s rural industry. J Comp Econ 31(3): 486–502
Lopez-de-Silanes F (1997) Determinants of privatization prices. Q J Econ 112(4): 965–1025
Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) Privatization in the United States. Rand J Econ 28(3): 447–471
Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Megginson WL, Netter JM (2001) From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. J Econ Lit 39(2): 321–389
Plane P (1997) Privatization and economic growth: an empirical investigation from a sample of developing market economies. Appl Econ 29(2): 161–178
Ramamurti R (2000) A multilevel model of privatization in emerging economies. Acad Manag Rev 25(3): 525–550
Suliman O, Ghebreysus G (2001) Determinants of privatisation in selected sub-Saharan African countries: is privatisation politically induced?. J Econ Dev 26(2): 33–48
Warner M, Hebdon R (2001) Local government restructuring: privatization and its alternatives. J Policy Anal Manag 20(2): 315–336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizutani, F., Uranishi, S. Determinants of privatization of public corporations: evidence from the Japanese experience. Empir Econ 39, 515–535 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0316-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0316-4