Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-parametric tests of real exchange rates in the post-Bretton Woods era

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the mean-reverting property of real exchange rates. Earlier studies have generally not been able to reject the null hypothesis of a unit-root in real exchange rates, especially for the post-Bretton Woods floating period. The results imply that long-run purchasing power parity does not hold. More recent studies, especially those using panel unit-root tests or nonlinear time series models, have found more favorable results, however. But the results from these recent studies are far from conclusive. Consistent individual country time series evidence that supports long-run purchasing power parity continues to be scarce. In this paper, we test for long memory using (Lo’s in Econometrica 59:1279–1313, 1991) the modified rescaled range test, and the rescaled variance test of Giraitis et al. (J Econ 112:265–294, 2003a). Our testing procedure provides a non-parametric alternative to the parametric tests commonly used in this literature. Our data set consists of monthly observations from April 1973 to April 2001 of the G-6 countries (excluding the US) in the OECD. Using the modified rescaled range test, we find only 2 cases out of 15 where the null hypothesis of a unit-root with short-term dependence could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of long-term dependence and none using the rescaled variance test. Our results therefore do not provide strong empirical support for the stationarity of real exchange rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agiakloglou C, Newbold P, Wohar M (1993) Bias in an estimator of the fractional difference parameter. J Time Series Anal 14: 235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK (1991) Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59: 817–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62: 1383–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66: 47–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baille RT (1996) Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. J Econ 73: 5–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum CF, Barkoulas JT, Caglayan M (1999) Long memory or structural breaks: can either explain nonstationary real exchange rates under the current float. J Inter Financial Market Inst Money 9: 359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers MJ (1998) Long memory and aggregation in macroeconomic time series. Int Econ Rev 39: 1053–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Tiao GC (1990) Random level-shift time series models, ARIMA approximations, and level-shift detection. J Bus Econ Stat 8: 83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YW (1993a) Tests for fractional integration: a Monte Carlo investigation. J Time Ser Anal 14: 331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YW (1993b) Long memory in foreign-exchange rates. J Bus Econ Stat 11: 93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YW, Lai KS (2000) On the purchasing power parity puzzle. J Int Econ 52: 321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cioczek-Georges R, Mandelbrot BB (1995) A class of micropulses and antipersistent fractional Brownian motion. Stoch Proc Appl 60: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla V, Giraitis L, Hidalgo J (2005) Consistent estimation of the memory parameter for non-linear time series. J Time Ser Anal 27: 211–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RB, Harte DS (1987) Tests for Hurst effect. Biometrica 74: 95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong DN, Nankervis JC, Savin NE, Whiteman C (1992) Integration versus trend stationarity in time series. Econometrica 60: 423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the Estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Husted S, Rush M (1991) Real exchange rates under the gold standard. J Pol Econ 99: 1252–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Inoue A (2001) Long memory and regime switching. J Econ 105: 131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD (1991) On the power of Dickey-Fuller tests against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett 35: 155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch R (1976) Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. J Pol Econ 84: 1161–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukhan P, Oppenheim G, Taqqu MS (eds) (2002) Theory and applications of long-range dependence. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel C (1996) Long-run PPP may not hold after all. J Int Econ 51: 243–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel C, Kim CJ (1999) The long-run US/UK real exchange rate. J Money Credit Bank Part 1 31: 335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel JA (1978) A monetary approach to the exchange rate: doctrinal aspects and empirical evidence. In: Frenkel JA, Johnson HG (eds) The economics of exchange rate. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J, Porter-Hudak S (1983) The estimation and application of long memory time series models. J Time Ser Anal 4: 221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Kokoszka P, Leipus R, Teyssière G (2003a) Rescaled variance and related tests for long memory in volatility and levels. J Econ 112: 265–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Kokoszka P, Leipus R, Teyssière G (2003b) On the power of R/S-type tests under contiguous and semi-long memory alternatives. Acta Appl Math 78: 285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Leipus R, Philippe A (2006) A test for stationarity versus trends and unit roots for a wide class of dependent errors. Econ Theory 22: 989–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1980) Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models. J Econ 14: 227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Ding Z (1996) Varieties of long memory models. J Econ 73: 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Hyung N (2004) Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock returns. J Empir Finance 11: 399–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Joyeux R (1980) An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. J Time Ser Anal 1: 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkio CS (1986) Does the exchange rate follow a random walk? A Monte Carlo study of four tests for a random walk. J Int Money Finance 5: 221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler U, Wolters J (1994) On the power of unit root tests against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett 45: 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haubrich JG, Lo AW (2001) The Sources and nature of long-term memory in aggregate output. Econ Rev Federal Reserve Bank Cleveland 37: 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking J (1981) Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68: 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 116: 770–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Sweeney R (1996) Mean reversion in real exchange rates: evidence and implications for forecasting. J Int Money Finance 15: 535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson S, Löthgren M (2000) On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Econ Lett 66: 249–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedijk KG, Schotman PC, Van Dijk MA (1998) The re-emergence of PPP in the 1990s. J Int Money Finance 17: 51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima LR, Xiao Z (2004) Robustness of stationary tests under long-memory alternatives. Working paper 541, Escola de Pós-Graduação em Economia da Fundação Getulio Vargas

  • Lo AW (1991) Long-term memory in stock market prices. Econometrica 59: 1279–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo AW, MacKinlay C (1989) The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples: a Monte Carlo investigation. J Econ 40: 203–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN (1999) A semiparametric two-step estimator for a multivariate long memory processes. J Econ 90: 129–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian JR (1998) Some new stylized facts of floating exchange rates. J Int Money Finance 17: 29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lothian JR, Taylor MP (1996) The recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries. J Pol Econ 104: 488–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1972) Statistical methodology for non-periodic cycles: from the covariance to R/S analysis. Ann Econ Soc Meas. 1: 259–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB, Wallis JR (1969) Robustness of the rescaled range R/S in the measurement of noncyclic long run statistical dependence. Water Resour Res 5: 967–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanari A, Rosso R, Taqqu MS (1997) Fractionally differenced ARIMA models applied to hydrologic time series: identification, estimation, and simulation. Water Resour Res 33: 1035–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Papell DH (2002) The purchasing power parity persistence paradigm. J Int Econ 56: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Piger J, Zivot E (2001) Markov regime switching and unit-root tests. J Bus Econ Stat 19: 404–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey W, West K (1987) A simple positive definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell PGJ (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. J Int Econ 44: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanissian A, Russell JR, Tsay RS (2008) True or spurious long memory? A new test. J Bus Econ Stat 26: 161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papell DH (1997) Searching for stationarity: purchasing power parity under the current float. J Int Econ 43: 313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papell DH (2002) The great appreciation, the great depreciation, and the purchasing power parity hypothesis. J Int Econ 57: 51–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papell DH, Theodoridis H (1998) Increasing evidence of purchasing power parity over the current float. J Int Money Finance 17: 41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke WR (1999) What is fractional integration?. Rev Econ Stat 81: 632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Shimotsu K (2004) Local Whittle estimation in nonstationary and unit root cases. Ann Stat 32: 656–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1994) Semiparametric analysis of long-memory time series. Ann Stat 22: 515–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1995a) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of long range dependence. Ann Stat 23: 1630–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1995b) Log-periodogram regression of time series with long range dependence. Ann Stat 23: 1048–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (2003) Long memory time series. In: Robinson PM (eds) Time series with long memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff K (1996) The purchasing power parity puzzle. J Econ Lit 34: 647–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno L, Taylor MP (1998) Real exchange rates under the recent float: unequivocal evidence of mean reversion. Econ Lett 60: 131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno L, Taylor MP (2002) Purchasing power parity and the real exchange rate. IMF Staff Papers 49: 65–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell F (1992) Maximum likelihood estimation of stationary univariate fractionally integrated time series models. J Econ 53: 165–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Taqqu MS, Willinger W, Sherman R (1997) Proof of a fundamental result in self-similar traffic modeling. Comput Commun Rev 27: 5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teverovsky V, Taqqu MS, Willinger W (1999) A critical look at Lo’s modified R/S statistic. J Stat Plan Inf 80: 211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco C (1999) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of non-stationary time series. J Time Ser Anal 20: 87–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JR, Matalas NC (1970) Small sample properties of h and k–estimators of the Hurst coefficient h. Water Resour Res 6: 1583–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willinger W, Taqqu MS, Teverovsky V (1999) Stock market prices and long-range dependence. Finance Stoch 3: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Z (2003) Note on bandwidth selection in testing for long-range dependence. Econ Lett 78: 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, U-1063, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-1063, USA

    Francis W. Ahking

Authors
  1. Francis W. Ahking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis W. Ahking.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahking, F.W. Non-parametric tests of real exchange rates in the post-Bretton Woods era. Empir Econ 39, 439–456 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0312-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0312-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation