Abstract
This study develops an alternative variability forecasting method, the midpoint method. This method, along with the interval computing and OLS lower and upper bound methods in the literature, is applied to predict variability in the stock market and mortgage rates. Results suggest that both the midpoint and interval computing methods can generate significantly higher accuracy in variability forecasts than the OLS lower and upper bound method. Nonetheless, the midpoint method requires less asymmetric distribution of input data than the interval computing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chatfield C (1993) Calculating interval forecasts. J Business Econ Stat 11: 121–144
Chatfield C (2001) Prediction intervals for time-series forecasting. In: Armstrong JS (ed) Principles of forecasting: handbook for researchers and practitioners. Kluwer, Armstrong
Fama E (1981) Stock returns, real activity, inflation, and money. Am Econ Rev 71: 545–565
Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors in the returns of stocks and bonds. J Financial Econ 33: 3–56
Fama E, French K (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financial Econ 43: 153–193
He L, Hu C (2007) Impacts of interval measurement on studies of Economic variability: Evidence from stock market variability forecasting. J Risk Finance 8: 489–507
He L, Hu C (2008) Impacts of interval computing on stock market variability forecasting. Comput Econ 33:263–276
He L, Hu C, Casey KM (2008) Prediction of variability in mortgage rates: interval computing solutions. J Risk Finance 10:142–154
Hu C, Kearfott B, Korvin A, Kreinovich V (2008) Knowledge Processing with interval and soft computing. Springer, UK
Hu C, He L (2007) An application of interval methods to stock market forecasting. J Reliab Comput 13: 423–434
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, L.T., Hu, C. Midpoint method and accuracy of variability forecasting. Empir Econ 38, 705–715 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0286-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0286-6