Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stepping-stones, dead-ends, or both? An analysis of Swedish replacement contracts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper studies whether temporary jobs in the form of fixed-term replacement contracts reduce the risk of future unemployment among job-seekers. Using matching on detailed information on labour market history and personal characteristics we find positive average effects of having a replacement contract. Our second focus is on whether the duration of the contract matters. We use data on replacement contracts with information on the ex ante duration of the contract which is determined by the individual on leave and find no significant effect on the subsequent unemployment risk of the replacement worker. However, the longer the replacement contract the higher is the probability of having an open ended contract at the same site 2–2.5 years after the start of the contract. Overall, the results suggest that replacement contracts may reduce the risk of future unemployment, but that longer contracts only improve the position within the workplace and not necessarily on the labour market in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altonji J, Pierret C (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Q J Econ 116(1): 313–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter O (1978) Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. Rev Econ Stat 60: 47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor D, Houseman S (2005) Do temporary help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers? Evidence from random assignments. Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper No 05-124

  • Biewen M, Fitzenberger B, Osikominu A, Waller M (2007) Which program for whom? Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of public sponsored training programs in Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper No 07-042, Mannheim

  • Booth AL, Dolado JJ, Frank J (2002) Symposium on temporary work: introduction. Econ J 112(480): F181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borland J, Tseng Y (2004) Does ‘Work for the Dole’ work? Melbourne Institute Working Paper No 14/04

  • Carling K, Larsson L (2005) Does early intervention help the unemployed youth?. Labour Econ 12(3): 301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia R, Wahba S (1999) Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs. J Am Stat Assoc 94: 1053–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forslund A, Johansson P, Lindqvist L (2004) Employment subsidies—a fast lane from unemployment to work? Working Paper 2004:18, IFAU

  • Gerfin M, Lechner M (2002) Microeconometric evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. Econ J 112(482): 854–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P, Smith J (1998) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66(5): 1017–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich C, Mueser P, Troske K (2005a) Welfare to temporary work: implications for labor market outcomes. Rev Econ Stat 87(1): 154–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich C, Mueser P, Troske K (2005b) The impact of a temporary help job: an analysis of outcomes for participants in three Missouri programs. Mimeo

  • Holmlund B, Storrie D (2002) Temporary jobs in turbulent times: the Swedish experience. Econ J 112: F245–F269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotz J, Imbens G, Mortimer J (1999) Predicting the efficacy of future training programs using past experience. NBER Technical Working Paper, 238

  • Imbens G (2004) Semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86: 4–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides YM, Loury LD (2004) Job information networks, neighborhood effects and inequality. J Econ Lit

  • Johansson P, Martinson S (2000) The effect of increased employer contacts within a labour market training program. Working Paper 2000:10, IFAU

  • Katz L, Meyer B (1990) Unemployment insurance, recall expectations and unemployment outcomes. Q J Econ 105(4): 973–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson L (2003) Evaluation of Swedish Youth Programs. J Hum Resour 38(4): 891–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson L, Lindqvist L, Skans ON (2005) Stepping-stones or dead-ends? An analysis of Swedish replacement contracts. Working Paper 2005:18, IFAU

  • Lindqvist L (2004) Deltagare och arbetsgivare i friårsförsöket. Rapport 2004:6, IFAU

  • Neal D (1999) The complexity of job mobility among young men. J Labour Econ 17: 237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzari M (2004) Do friends and relatives really help in getting a good job? Discussion Paper 623. CEP, London

  • Skans ON, Lindqvist L (2005) Causal effects of subsidized career breaks. Working Paper 2005:17, IFAU

  • Wallette M (2004) Temporary jobs in Sweden. Incidence, exit, and on-the-job training. Lund Economic Studies 120, Lund University, Lund

  • Zijl M, van den Berg GJ, Heyma A (2004) Stepping stones for the unemployed: the effect of temporary jobs on the duration until regular work. Working Paper 2004:19 IFAU

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oskar Nordström Skans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartman, L., Liljeberg, L. & Skans, O.N. Stepping-stones, dead-ends, or both? An analysis of Swedish replacement contracts. Empir Econ 38, 645–668 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0283-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0283-9

Keywords

Navigation