Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between the business cycle and individuals’ duration in unemployment. I use multi-spell unemployment duration data of British males and monthly series of regional vacancies over unemployment, referred to as labour market tightness, to control for the business cycle. In line with most previous studies I find that the observed negative duration dependence on an aggregate level is explained by both sorting and strong negative individual duration dependence, and that the individual hazard of leaving unemployment increases with labour market tightness. The new empirical findings emerge from the interactions between individual duration dependence and the business cycle. Individual heterogeneity, and in particular the variation over the business cycle in the composition of the newly unemployed, explains most of the systematic variation over the business cycle in duration dependence on an aggregate level. Individual duration dependence does not vary over the business cycle in a way that would lend support to the predictions concerning this of the matching model of Lockwood (Rev Econ Stud 58:733–753, 1991) or the ranking model of Blanchard and Diamond (Rev Econ Stud 61:417–434, 1994).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbring J, Van den Berg GJ, Van Ours JC (2001) Business cycles and compositional variation in US unemployment. J Bus Econ Stat 19: 436–448
Abbring J, Van den Berg GJ, Van Ours JC (2002) The anatomy of unemployment dynamics. Eur Econ Rev 46: 1785–1824
Arulampalum W, Stewart MB (1995) The determinants of individual unemployment Durations in an era of high unemployment. Econ J 105(429): 321–332
Baker M (1992) Unemployment duration: compositional effects and cyclical variability. Am Econ Rev 82(1): 313–321
Baker M, Melino A (2000) Duration dependence and nonparametric heterogeneity: a Monte Carlo study. J Econom 96: 357–393
Bell B, Blundell R, Van Reenen J (1999) Getting the unemployed back to work: the role of targeted wage subsidies. Working papers series, no W99/12, The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London
Blanchard OJ, Diamond P (1994) Ranking, unemployment duration, and wages. Rev Econ Stud 61: 417–434
Butler RJ, McDonald JB (1986) Trends in unemployment duration data. Rev Econ Stat LXVIII(4): 545–557
Cockx B, Dejemeppe M (2005) Duration dependence in the exit rate out of unemployment in Belgium Is it True or Spurious. J Appl Econom 20(1): 1–23
Darby MR, Haltiwanger JC, Plant M (1985) Unemployment rate dynamics and persistent unemployment under rational expectations. Am Econ Rev 75: 614–637
Dolton PJ, O’Neill D (1996) Unemployment duration and the restart effect: some experimental evidence. Econ J 106: 387–400
Dolton PJ, Makepeace GH, Treble JG (1994) The youth training scheme and the school-to-work transition. Oxf Econ Pap 46: 629–657
Dynarski M, Sheffrin SM (1990) The behavior of unemployment durations over the cycle. Rev Econ Stat 72: 350–356
Elbers C, Ridder G (1982) True and spurious duration dependence: the identifiability of the proportional hazard model. Rev Econ Stud 49: 403–409
Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2): 271–320
Honoré BE (1993) Identification results for duration models with multiple spells. Rev Econ Stud 60: 241–246
Huh K, Sickles RC (1994) Estimation of the duration model by nonparametric maximum likelihood, maximum penalized likelihood, and probability simulators. Rev Econ Stat 4: 683–694
Imbens GW (1994) Transition models in a non-stationary environment. Rev Econ Stat LXXVI: 703–720
Imbens GW, Lynch LM (1993) Re-employment probabilities over the business cycle. Working paper no 4585, National Bureau of Economic Research, USA
Jackman R, Layard R (1991) Does long-term unemployment reduce a Person’s chance of a job?. A Time-series Test Economica 58: 93–106
Kalwij A (2001) Individuals’ unemployment durations over the business cycle. Discussion paper no 369, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn
Kalwij A (2004) Individuals’ lifecycle unemployment experiences: on the road to stable employment?. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 66(2): 204–237
Lancaster T (1979) Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment. Econometrica 47(4): 939–956
Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data, Econometric society monographs, no 17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, New York
Lockwood B (1991) Information externalities in the labour market and the duration of unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 58: 733–753
Narendranathan W, Stewart MB (1993a) Modelling the probability of leaving unemployment: competing risks models with flexible baseline hazards. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 42: 63–83
Narendranathan W, Stewart MB (1993b) How does the benefit effect vary as unemployment spells lengthen?. J Appl Econom 8: 361–381
Nickell S (1999) Unemployment in Britain, chapter 1. In: Gregg P, Wadsworth J (eds) The state of working Britain. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Pissarides CA (1992) Loss of skill during unemployment and the persistence of employment shocks. Q J Econ 107: 1371–1391
Pissarides CA (2000) Equilibrium unemployment theory. The MIT Press, London
Rosholm M (2001) Cyclical variation in unemployment duration. J Popul Econ 14: 173–191
Salant SW (1977) Search theory and duration data: a theory of sorts. Q J Econ 91(1): 39–57
Sider H (1985) Unemployment duration and incidence: 1968–82. Am Econ Rev 75(4): 461–472
Sweeney K (1996) Destination of leavers from claimant unemployment. Employment Gazette, October issue, pp 443–452
Turon H (2003) Inflow composition, duration dependence and their impact on the unemployment outflow rate. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65: 31–47
Vanden Berg GJ (2001) Duration models: specification, identification, and multiple durations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol V. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Van den Berg GJ, Van der Klaauw B (2001) Combining micro and macro unemployment duration data. J Econom 102: 271–309
Van den Berg GJ, Van Ours JC (1994) Unemployment dynamics and duration dependence in France, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Econ J 104: 432–443
Vishwanath T (1989) Job search, stigma effect, and escape from unemployment. J Labor Econ 7: 487–502
Ward H, Bird D (1995) The JUVOS cohort: a longitudinal database of the claimant unemployed Employment Gazette, September issue, pp 345–350
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the seminar participants at the Departments of Economics at the Universities of Amsterdam, Oxford, Reading and Tilburg, Mary Gregory at the University of Oxford, and three anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. I thank Nigel Stuttard at National Statistics for providing the JUVOS data. Financial support from the Leverhulme Trust project ‘The labour market consequences of technical and structural change’ is gratefully acknowledged.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kalwij, A. Unemployment durations and the pattern of duration dependence over the business cycle of British males. Empir Econ 38, 429–456 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0274-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0274-x