Skip to main content

Markup cyclicality and input factor adjustments

Abstract

This paper investigates the existence of markups and their cyclical behaviour at the industry sector level. Markups are given as a price-cost relation that is estimated from a dynamic, structural model of the firm. The firms face costly adjustment of labour and potential financial constraints. The model is tested on a panel of firm- and plant-level data from Norwegian manufacturing industries. The results indicate a frequent presence of moderate pro-cyclical markups. Labour adjustment costs are present in four out of seven sectors but small in magnitude. The results are related to the role played by unions in a setting with high union density.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abel AB, Eberly JC (2002) Investment and q with fixed costs: an empirical analysis. Mimeo, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68: 29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askildsen JE, Nilsen ØA (2002) Union membership and wage formation. Eur J Polit Econ 18: 345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bils M (1987) The cyclical behavior of marginal cost and price. Am Econ Rev 77: 838–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond S, Meghir C (1994) Dynamic investment models and the Firm’s financial policy. Rev Econ Stud 61: 197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond S, van Reenen J (2007) Micro-econometric models of investment and employment. In: Heckman J, Leamer L (eds) Handbook of econometrics, Part 1, vol 6. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp 4417–4498

  • Borenstein S, Shepard A (1996) Dynamic pricing in retail Gasoline markets. Rand J Econ 27: 429–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottasso A, Galeotti M, Sembenelli A (1999) Financing constraints and markups: further evidence from Italian firm level data. In: Biffignandi S (eds) Micro- and macrodata of firms: statistical analysis and international comparison. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 645–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratsberg B, Ragan JF (2002) Changes in the Union Wage premium by industry. Ind Labor Relat Rev 56: 65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko RS, Fazzari SM (1994) Economic fluctuations, market power, and returns to scale: evidence from firm-level data. J Appl Econom 9: 47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko RS, Fazzari SM (2000) Market power and inflation. Rev Econ Stat 8: 509–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko RS, Schaller H (1995) Why does liquidity matter in investment equations?. J Money Credit Bank 27: 527–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, Haltiwanger J, Power L (1999) Machine replacement and the business cycle: lumps and bumps. Am Econ Rev 89: 921–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz I, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1986) Business cycles and the relationship between concentration and price-cost margins. Rand J Econ 17: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz I, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1987) Oligopoly supergames: some empirical evidence on prices and margins. J Ind Econ 36: 9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Doms M, Dunne T (1998) Capital adjustment patterns in manufacturing plants. Rev Econ Dyn 1: 409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fariñas JC, Huergo E (2003) Profit margins, adjustment costs and the business cycle: an application to Spanish manufacturing firms. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65: 49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti M, Schiantarelli F (1998) The cyclicity of markups in a model with adjustment costs: econometric for US industry. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 60: 121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green E, Porter R (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52: 87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen R, Jensen R, Foyn F (1991) Dokumentasjon av industristatistikkens tidsseriebase. Mimeo, Statistics Norway

  • Hamermesh DS, Pfann GA (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. J Econ Lit 34: 1264–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50: 1029–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Econometric society monographs, no. 11. Cambridge, New York

  • Hubbard RG, Kashyap AK, Whited TM (1995) International finance and firm investment. J Money Credit Bank 27: 683–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn LM (1998) Against the wind: bargaining recentralisation and wage inequality in Norway 1987–1991. Econ J 108: 603–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klette TJ (1999) Market power, scale economies and productivity: estimates from a panel of establishment data. J Ind Econ 47: 451–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette TJ, Griliches Z (1996) The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous. J Appl Econom 11: 343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald I, Solow RM (1985) Wages and employment in a segmented labor market. Q J Econ 100: 1115–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen ØA, Schiantarelli F (2003) Zeros and lumps in investment: empirical evidence on irreversibilities and nonconvexities. Rev Econ Stat 85: 1021–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999) Employment protection and labour market performance. Employment Outlook, OECD, Paris

  • Roodman DM (2005) xtabond2: stata module to extend xtabond dynamic panel data estimator. Center for Global Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (1986) A super game theoretic model of price wars during booms. Am Econ Rev 77: 390–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg JJ, Woodford M (1999) The cyclical behavior of prices and costs. In: Handbook of macroeconomics 1B. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 1051–1135

  • Salvanes KG (1997) Market rigidities and labour market flexibility: an international comparison. Scand J Econ 99: 315–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein M, Golden MA, Lange P (1997) Unions, Employers’ Associations, and Wage-Setting Institutions in Northern and Central Europe, 1950–1992. Ind Labor Relat 50: 379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whited TM (1992) Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: evidence from panel data. J Financ 47: 1425–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J Econom 126: 25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunnava PV, Honney JK (1991) The union-nonunion wage differential over the business cycle: evidence from PSID. Econ Lett 37: 97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øivind Anti Nilsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Askildsen, J.E., Nilsen, Ø.A. Markup cyclicality and input factor adjustments. Empir Econ 38, 409–428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0273-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0273-y

Keywords

JEL Classification