Empirical Economics

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 417–438 | Cite as

Non-linearity in the determinants of capital structure: evidence from UK firms

  • Bassam Fattouh
  • Laurence Harris
  • Pasquale Scaramozzino
Original Paper

Abstract

We demonstrate that, by exploiting more fully the distribution of leverage, conditional quantile regression methods yield new insights into the choice of leverage ratio. For UK listed companies we find that not only is the estimated effect of the explanatory variables different at different quantiles of the distribution, but also that the effect of a variable changes sign between low leveraged and high leveraged firms.

Keywords

Capital structure Quantile regression method UK 

JEL Classification

G32 C29 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almazan A, Molina CA (2005) Intra-industry capital structure dispersion. J Econ Manage Strategy 14:263–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstrong RD, Frome EL, Kung DS (1979) Algorithm 79–01: a revised simplex algorithm for the absolute deviation curve fitting problem. In: Communications in statistics, simulation and computation B8(2). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 175–190Google Scholar
  3. Arias O, Hallock KF, Sosa-Escudero W (2001) Individual heterogeneity in the returns to schooling: instrumental variables quantile regression using twins data. Empirical Econ 26:7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barclay M, Smith CW Jr (1999) The capital structure puzzle: another look at the evidence. J Appl Corporate Finance 12:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benito A, Vlieghe G (2000) Stylised facts on UK corporate health: evidence from micro-data. Financial stability review. Bank of England, pp 83–93Google Scholar
  6. Benito A, Whitley J, Young G (2001) Analysing corporate and household sector balance sheets. Financial Stability Review, Bank of England, pp 160–174Google Scholar
  7. Benito A, Whitley J (2003) Implicit interest rates and corporate balance sheets: an analysis using aggregated and disaggregated UK data. Working Paper No 193 Bank of EnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett M, Donnelly R (1993) The determinants of capital structure: Some UK evidence. Br Account Rev 25:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bo H, Sterken E (2002) Volatility of the interest rate, debt and firm investment: Dutch evidence. J Corporate Finance 8:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth L, Aivazian V, Demirguc-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (2001) Capital structure in developing countries. J Finance 56:87–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley M, Jarrell G, Kim E (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence. J Finance 39:857–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchinsky M (1995) Estimating the asymptotic covariance matrix for quantile regression models: a Monte Carlo study. J Econom 65:109–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bushinsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. J Hum Resour 33:89–126Google Scholar
  14. Bunn P, Young G (2003) Balance sheet adjustment by UK companies. Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, pp 315–326Google Scholar
  15. Castanias R (1983) Bankruptcy risk and the optimal capital structure. J Finance 38:1617–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeAngelo H, Masulis RW (1980) Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. J Financial Econ 8:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doukas JA, Pantzalis C (2003) Geographic diversification and agency costs of debt of multinational firms. J Corporate Finance 9:59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferri MG, Jones WH (1979) Determinants of financial structure: a new methodological approach. J Finance 34:631–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallant AR, Fuller WA (1973) Fitting segmented polynomial regression models whose join points have to be estimated. J Am Stat Assoc 68:144–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilson SC (1997) Transactions costs and capital structure choice: Evidence from financially distressed firms. J Finance 52:161–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris M, Raviv A (1991) The theory of capital structure. J Finance 46:297–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaramillo F, Schiantarelli F, Weiss A (1996) Capital market imperfections before and after financial liberalization: an Euler equation approach to panel data for Ecuadorian firms. J Develop Econ 51:367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: management behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financial Econ 4:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koenker R (2004) Linear hypothesis: regression (Quantile), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 8893–8899Google Scholar
  26. Koenker R, Basset G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lasfer MA (1995) Agency costs, taxes and debt. Eur Financial Manage 1:265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financial Econ 13:87–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers SC (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Finance 39:575–592Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financial Econ 5:147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozkan A (2001) Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: evidence from UK company panel data. J Bus Finance Account 28:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panno A (2003) An empirical investigation on the determinants of capital structure: the UK and Italian experience. J Appl Financial Econ 13:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peyer UC, Shivdasani (2001) Leverage and internal capital markets: evidence from leveraged recapitalizations. J Financial Econ 59:477–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rajan RG, Zingales L (1995) What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J Finance 50:1421–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramsay JO (1988) Monotone regression splines in action. Stat Sci 3:425–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott J (1977) Bankruptcy, secured debt, and optimal capital structure. J Finance 32:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor L, Rada C (2003) Debt-equity cycles in the 20th century: empirical evidence and a dynamic Keynesian model. Center for Economic Policy Analysis, New School University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Titman S, Wessels R (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. J Finance 43:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wald J (1999) How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison. J Financial Res 22:161–187Google Scholar
  39. Yu K, Lu Z, Stander J (2003) Quantile regression: applications and current research area. Statistician 52:331–350Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bassam Fattouh
    • 1
  • Laurence Harris
    • 1
  • Pasquale Scaramozzino
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department for Financial and Management Studies, SOASUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversita’ di Roma Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations