Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PISA: What makes the difference?

Explaining the gap in test scores between Finland and Germany

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The large difference in the level and variance of student performance in the 2000 PISA study between Finland and Germany motivates this paper. It analyses why Finnish students showed a significantly higher performance by estimating educational production functions for both countries, using a unique micro-level dataset with imputed data and added school type information. The difference in reading proficiency scores is assigned to different effects, using Oaxaca–Blinder and Juhn–Murphy–Pierce decomposition methods. The analysis shows that German students and schools have on average more favorable characteristics except for the lowest deciles, but experience much lower returns to these characteristics in terms of test scores than Finnish students. The role of school types remains ambiguous. Overall, the observable characteristics explain more of the variation in test scores in Germany than in Finland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R, Wu M (2002) PISA 2000 technical report. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammermueller A, Heijke H, Woessmann L (2005) Schooling quality in Eastern Europe: Educational production during transition. Econ Educat Rev 24:579–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artelt C, Schiefele U, Schneider W, Stanat P (2002) Leseleistungen deutscher Schülerinnen und Schüler im internationalen Vergleich (PISA). Z Erziehungswissenschaften 5:6–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert J, Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (2001) PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Leske und Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J, Woessmann L (2004) Institutional effects in a simple model of educational production. Educat Econ 12:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau F, Kahn L (1992) The gender earnings gap: learning from international comparisons. In: American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 82:533–538

  • Blinder A (1973) Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. J Human Resour 8:436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurybase (2003) The information network on education in Europe. http://www.eurydice.org, visited October 24th 2003

  • Fertig M (2003) Who’s to blame? The determinants of German student’s achievement in the PISA 2000 study. IZA Discussion Paper No. 739, Bonn

  • Garcia J, Hernández P, López-Nicolás A (2001) How wide is the gap? An investigation of gender wage differences using quantile regression. Empirical Econ 26:149–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton R, Swaminathan H (1989) Item response theory. Principles and applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Luque J (2003) Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Econ Educat Rev 22:481–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann, B (2005) Standard errors for the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition. http://repec.org/dsug2005/ oaxaca_se_handout.pdf

  • Juhn C, Murphy K, Pierce B (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. J Polit Econ 101:410–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer C (2000) Gender wage gap in West Germany: How far do gender differences in human capital matter? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 00–07, Mannheim

  • Oaxaca R (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14:693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman B (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman& Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd P, Wolpin K (2003) On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Econ J 113:F3–F33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi J, Linnakylä P, Kupari P, Reinikainen P, Arffman I (2002) The Finnish success in PISA – and some reasons behind it. http://www.jyu.fi/ktl/pisa/publicationl.pdf

  • West M, Woessmann L (2006) Which school systems sort weaker students into smaller classes? International Evidence. European J Polit Econ (in press)

  • Woessmann L (2003) Schooling resources, educational institutions, and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bull Econ Statist 65:117–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), P.O. Box 103443, 68034, Mannheim, Germany

    Andreas Ammermueller

Authors
  1. Andreas Ammermueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Ammermueller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ammermueller, A. PISA: What makes the difference?. Empirical Economics 33, 263–287 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0102-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0102-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation