Abstract
In this paper, two-sided exponential–geometric (TSEG) distribution is proposed and its statistical properties are studied comprehensively. The proposed distribution is applied to the GJR-GARCH model to introduce a new conditional model in forecasting Value-at-Risk (VaR). Nikkei-225 and BIST-100 indexes are analyzed to demonstrate the VaR forecasting performance of GJR-GARCH-TSEG model against the GJR-GARCH models defined under normal, Student-t, skew-T and generalized error innovation distributions. The backtesting methodology is used to evaluate the out-of-sample performance of VaR models. Empirical findings show that GJR-GARCH-TSEG model produces more accurate VaR forecasts than other competitive models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamidis K, Loukas S (1998) A lifetime distribution with decreasing failure rate. Stat Probab Lett 39(1):35–42
Altun E, Tatlidil H, Özel G, Nadarajah S (2018) A new generalization of skew-T distribution with volatility models. J Stat Comput Simul 88(7):1252–1272
Altun E, Tatlıdil H, Özel G (2019) Conditional ASGT-GARCH approach to value-at-risk. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A Sci 43(1):239–247
Angelidis T, Benos A, Degiannakis S (2004) The use of GARCH models in VaR estimation. Stat Methodol 1(1–2):105–128
Bidram H, Nadarajah S (2016) A new lifetime model with decreasing, increasing, bathtub-shaped, and upside-down bathtub-shaped hazard rate function. Statistics 50(1):139–156
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 31(3):307–327
Bollerslev T (1987) A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Rev Econ Stat 69:542–547
Chen Q, Gerlach R, Lu Z (2012) Bayesian value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting via the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 56(11):3498–3516
Christoffersen PF (1998) Evaluating interval forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39:841–862
Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Finance 1:223–236
Dendramis Y, Spungin GE, Tzavalis E (2014) Forecasting VaR models under different volatility processes and distributions of return innovations. J Forecast 33(7):515–531
Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econom J Econ Soc 50:987–1007
Engle RF, Manganelli S (2004) CAViaR: conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J Bus Econ Stat 22(4):367–381
Erdelyi A, Magnus W, Oberhettinger F, Tricomi FG (1953) Higher transcendental functions. McGraw-Hill, New York
Fernandez C, Steel MF (1998) On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J Am Stat Assoc 93(441):359–371
Glosten LR, Jagannathan R, Runkle DE (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J Finance 48(5):1779–1801
Hinkley DV, Revankar NS (1977) Estimation of the Pareto law from underreported data: a further analysis. J Econom 5(1):1–11
Kupiec PH (1995) Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J Deriv 3(2):73–84
Lambert P, Laurent S (2001) Modelling financial time series using GARCH-type models and a skewed student density. Mimeo, Université de Liége, New York
Louzada F, Roman M, Cancho VG (2011) The complementary exponential geometric distribution: model, properties, and a comparison with its counterpart. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(8):2516–2524
Louzada F, Marchi V, Roman M (2014) The exponentiated exponential-geometric distribution: a distribution with decreasing, increasing and unimodal failure rate. Statistics 48(1):167–181
Louzada F, Ramos PL, Perdona GS (2016) Different estimation procedures for the parameters of the extended exponential geometric distribution for medical data. Comput Math Methods Med 2016:1–12
Lyu Y, Wang P, Wei Y, Ke R (2017) Forecasting the VaR of crude oil market: do alternative distributions help? Energy Econ 66:523–534
Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econom J Econom Soc 59:347–370
Sarma M, Thomas S, Shah A (2003) Selection of value-at-risk models. J Forecast 22(4):337–358
So MK, Philip LH (2006) Empirical analysis of GARCH models in value at risk estimation. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 16(2):180–197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altun, E. Two-sided exponential–geometric distribution: inference and volatility modeling. Comput Stat 34, 1215–1245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00873-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00873-3