Skip to main content
Log in

Objective Bayesian tests for Fieller–Creasy problem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a statistical perspective, the Fieller–Creasy problem which involves inference about the ratio of two normal means has been quite challenging. In this study, we consider some solutions to this problem, based on an objective Bayesian model selection procedure. First, we develop the objective priors for testing the ratio of two normal means, based on measures of divergence between competing models. We then propose the intrinsic priors and the fractional priors for which the Bayes factors and model selection probabilities are well defined. In addition, we prove that the Bayes factors based on divergence-based priors, as well as intrinsic and fractional priors, are consistent for large sample sizes. Finally, we derive the Bayesian reference criterion from the Bayesian decision theory framework, based on the intrinsic discrepancy loss function. The behaviors of the Bayes factors are compared by undertaking a simulation study and using a case study example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbieri MM, Liseo B, Petrella L (2000) Bayes factors for Fieller’s problem. Biometrika 87:717–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri MJ, García-Donato G (2007) Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear model. Biometrika 94:135–152

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri MJ, García-Donato G (2008) Generalization of Jeffreys divergence-based priors for Bayesian hypothesis testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 70:981–1003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO, Bernardo JM (1992) On the development of reference priors (with discussion). In: Bernardo JM et al (eds) Bayesian statistics IV. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO, Pericchi LR (1996) The intrinsic Bayes factor for model selection and prediction. J Am Stat Assoc 91:109–122

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO, Mortera J (1999) Default Bayes factors for nonnested hypothesis testing. J Am Stat Assoc 94:542–554

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM (1977) Inferences about the ratio of normal means: a Bayesian approach to the Fieller–Creasy problem. In: Recent developments in statistics, proceedings of the 1976 European meeting of statisticians, pp 345–350

  • Bernardo JM, Rueda R (2002) Bayesian hypothesis testing: a reference approach. Int Stat Rev 70:351–372

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM (2005) Intrinsic credible regions: an objective Bayesian approach to interval estimation (with discussion). Test 14:317–384

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM, Pérez S (2007) Comparing normal means: new methods for an old problem. Bayesian Anal 2:45–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin BP, Louis TA (2000) Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Creasy MA (1954) Limits for the ratio of means. J R Stat Soc B 16:186–194

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Datta GS, Ghosh M (1995) Some remarks on noninformative priors. J AM Stat Assoc 90:1357–1363

  • De Santis F, Spezzaferri F (1999) Methods for default and robust Bayesian model comparison: the fractional Bayes factor approach. Int Stat Rev 67:267–286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fieller EC (1954) Some problems in interval estimation (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 16:175–185

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of Probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Kappenman RF, Geisser S, Antle CF (1970) Bayesian and fiducial solutions to the Fieller–Creasy problem. J R Stat Soc Ser B 32:331–340

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kass RE, Vaidyanathan S (1992) Approximate Bayes factors and orthogonal parameters, with application to testing equality of two binomial proportions. J R Stat Soc Ser B 54:129–144

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WD, Kim DL, Kang SG (2007) Bayesian inference for Fieller–Creasy problem using unbalanced data. J Korean Stat Soc 36:489–500

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liseo B (1993) Elimination of nuisance parameters with reference priors. Biometrika 80:295–304

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno E (1997) Bayes factor for intrinsic and fractional priors in nested models: Bayesian robustness. In: Yadolah D (ed) L1-statistical procedures and related topics, vol 31. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, pp 257–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno E, Bertolino F, Racugno W (1998) An intrinsic limiting procedure for model selection and hypotheses testing. J Am Stat Assoc 93:1451–1460

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee R, Ghosh M (1997) Second order probability matching priors. Biometrika 84:970–975

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ott RL (1998) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Berger JO (2002) Expected posterior prior distributions for model selection. Biometrika 89:491–512

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez S (2005) Objective Bayesian methods for mean comparison, PhD Thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Valencia

  • Phillipe A, Robert CP (1998) A note on the confidence properties of reference priors for the calibration model. Test 7:147–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reid N (1995) Likelihood and Bayesian approximation methods (with discussion). In: Bernardo JM et al (eds) Bayesian statistics V. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 351–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert C (1996) Intrinsic losses. Theory Decis 40:191–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DA, Smith AFM (1992) Sampling–resampling techniques for the computation of posterior densities in normal means problems. Test 1:1–18

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yin M, Ghosh M (2001) ayesian and likelihood inference for the generalized Fieller–Creasy problem. In: Ahmed SE, Reid N (eds) Empirical Bayes and likelihood inference. Springer, New York, pp 121–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A, Siow A (1980) Posterior odds ratio for selected regression hypotheses. In: Bernardo JM et al (eds) Bayesian statistics 1. University Press, Valencia, pp 585–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A, Siow A (1984) Basic issues in econometrics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor, associate editor and two anonymous referees for their thorough review of the paper and their valuable suggestions that improved the original version of the manuscript. Sang Gil Kang is one of first authors in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongku Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 212 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.H., Lee, W.D., Kang, S.G. et al. Objective Bayesian tests for Fieller–Creasy problem. Comput Stat 34, 1159–1182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0853-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0853-4

Keywords

Navigation