Skip to main content
Log in

Exact sample size determination for the ratio of two incidence rates under the Poisson distribution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present sample size determination using exact approaches for testing the ratio of incidence rates from a two-arm non-inferiority trial. The first approach is the exact conditional approach by treating the total number of events from two groups fixed, and the other is the exact unconditional approach based on maximization. Exact approaches guarantee the type I error rate which is often not satisfied in the commonly used asymptotic approaches on the basis of the corresponding limiting distributions of test statistics. We provide tables for sample size determination in commonly used cases in practice, and an example is used to show the application of these exact approaches. Sample size comparison using different exact approaches concludes that the exact unconditional approach based on the Wald-type test statistic has good performance in balanced studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown CC, Green SB (1982) Additional power computations for designing comparative Poisson trials. Am J Epidemiol 115(5):752–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler RJ (1957) Confidence intervals for the product of two binomial parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 52(280):482–493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference, 2nd edn. Thomson Learning, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DG (1952) On tests and estimates for the ratio of Poisson means. Ann Inst Stat Math 4(1):45–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu SN, Wang L (2009) Homogeneity tests for several Poisson populations. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(12):4266–4278

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Graham PL, Mengersen K, Morton AP (2003) Confidence limits for the ratio of two rates based on likelihood scores: non-iterative method. Stat Med 22(12):2071–2083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu K, Ng HKT, Tang ML, Schucany WR (2008) Testing the ratio of two Poisson rates. Biom J 50(2):283–298

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Han C (2008) Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests. Pharm Stat 7(3):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman MD (1984) An improved approximate two-sample Poisson test. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 33(2):224–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy K, Thomson J (2004) A more powerful test for comparing two Poisson means. J Stat Plan Inference 119(1):23–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li H-Q, Tang M-L, Wong W-K (2014) Confidence intervals for ratio of two Poisson rates using the method of variance estimates recovery. Comput Stat 29:869–889

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MT, Hsueh H-M (2013) Exact tests of the superiority under the Poisson distribution. Stat Probab Lett 83(5):1339–1345

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lui K-J (2005) Sample size calculation for testing non-inferiority and equivalence under Poisson distribution. Stat Methodol 2(1):37–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman KJ, Lash TL, Greenland S (2012) Modern epidemiology, mid-cycle revision edition, third edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan G (2014a) Exact approaches for testing non-inferiority or superiority of two incidence rates. Stat Probab Lett 85:129–134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shan G (2014b) Exact one-sided confidence limit for the ratio of two Poisson rates (under review)

  • Shan G (2015) Exact statistical inference for categorical data. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shan G, Ma C (2016) Unconditional tests for comparing two ordered multinomials. Stat Methods Med Res 25(1):241–254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shan G, Ma C, Hutson AD, Wilding GE (2012) An efficient and exact approach for detecting trends with binary endpoints. Stat Med 31(2):155–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shan G, Moonie S, Shen J (2014) Sample size calculation based on efficient unconditional tests for clinical trials with historical controls. J Biopharm Stat . doi:10.1080/10543406.2014.1000545

  • Shan G, Wang W (2013) ExactCIdiff: an R package for computing exact confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions. R J 5(2):62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan G, Wilding GE, Hutson AD, Gerstenberger S (2016) Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 35(8):1257–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stucke K, Kieser M (2013) Sample size calculations for noninferiority trials with Poisson distributed count data. Biom J 55(2):203–216

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Suissa S, Shuster JJ (1985) Exact unconditional sample sizes for the 2 \(\times \) 2 binomial trial. J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 148(4):317–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Shan G (2015) Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio. Biometrics 71(4):985–995

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Editor, the Associate Editor and two referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped to improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guogen Shan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shan, G. Exact sample size determination for the ratio of two incidence rates under the Poisson distribution. Comput Stat 31, 1633–1644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-016-0654-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-016-0654-6

Keywords

Navigation