Estimating value at risk with semiparametric support vector quantile regression
Value at Risk (VaR) has been used as an important tool to measure the market risk under normal market. Usually the VaR of log returns is calculated by assuming a normal distribution. However, log returns are frequently found not normally distributed. This paper proposes the estimation approach of VaR using semiparametric support vector quantile regression (SSVQR) models which are functions of the one-step-ahead volatility forecast and the length of the holding period, and can be used regardless of the distribution. We find that the proposed models perform better overall than the variance-covariance and linear quantile regression approaches for return data on S&P 500, NIKEI 225 and KOSPI 200 indices.
KeywordsEWMA GARCH t-GARCH Quantile regression Semiparametric support vector quantile regression Value at risk
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chen MJ, Chen J (2002) Application of quantile regression to estimation of value at risk. Working paper, National Chung-Cheng UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Diebold FX, Hickman A, Inoue A, Schuermann T (1998) Scale models. Risk 11: 104–107Google Scholar
- Jorion P (2007) Value at risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kuester K, Mittnik S, Paolella MS (2006) Value-at-risk prediction: a comparison of alternative strategies. J Financial Econom 4: 53–89Google Scholar
- Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (1951) Nonlinear programming. In: Proceedings of 2nd Berkeley symposium. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 481–492Google Scholar
- Smola AJ, Frieβ TT, Schölkopf B (1999) Semiparametric support vector and linear programming machines. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 11: 585–591Google Scholar
- Takeuchi I, Furuhashi T (2004) Non-crossing quantile regressions by SVM. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, pp 401–406Google Scholar
- White H (1992) Nonparametric estimation of conditional quantiles using neural networks. In: Artificial neural networks: Approximation and learning theory. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 191–205Google Scholar