Skip to main content
Log in

Failure-based design validation for effective repair of multi-metal additive manufacturing: the case of remanufacturable brake caliper

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inclusion of additive manufacturing (AM) as an automated repair method leads to a sustainable remanufacturing process, which is known as additive repair. Despite its potential in improving the efficiency of repair and restoration, additive repair remains in its infancy and requires a thorough investigation on part design and process parameters. The major concern raised in additive repair is the capability to create perfect bonding between two metals, which will affect the mechanical properties of the complete repaired part. Hence, performing evaluation from the beginning is crucial to validate the feasibility of the process through appropriate structural analysis and to obtain deformation and stress results. Brake caliper housing is selected as a remanufacturable component for case exemplary purposes. Prior to analysis, the potential damages and failures of the brake caliper component were initially evaluated through literature surveys and direct interviews with industry experts where two types of damages were identified, namely, cracks and broken or fractured parts. Then, the validation focuses on comparative analysis of two different conditions of the brake caliper housing: original, and repaired caliper model using finite element analysis in ANSYS. Results indicate that the strength of the repaired caliper model shows equal and higher strength compared with the original model. This result confirms that the repair process through AM can retain or improve the quality of the remanufactured brake caliper housing. Therefore, this paper provides a systematic framework for the evaluation of mechanical properties in multi-metal additive repair with the integration of failure analysis techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milios L, Matsumoto M (2019) Consumer perception of remanufactured automotive parts and policy implications for transitioning to a circular economy in Sweden. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He Y, Hao C, Li Y, Lim MK, Wang Y (2020) A failure feature identification method for adaptive remanufacturing. Proc CIRP 90:552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sundin E (2004) Product and process design for successful remanufacturing. PhD Thesis. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Östlin J (2008) On remanufacturing systems: analysing and managing material flows and remanufacturing processes. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oh WJ, Lee WJ, Kim MS, Jeon JB, Shim DS (2019) Repairing additive-manufactured 316L stainless steel using direct energy deposition. Opt Laser Technol 117:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15(10):932–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kin STM, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2014) Remanufacturing process planning. Procedia CIRP 15:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turan E, Koҫal T, Ünlüğenҫoğlu K (2011) Welding technologies in shipbuilding industry. Online J Sci Technol (TOJSAT) 1:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Q, Brandt M, Janardhana M, Cottam R, Matthews N, Sharp PK (2011) Potential application and certification of laser cladding technology for repair of ageing aircraft components. J Laser Appl. https://doi.org/10.2351/15062244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu R, Wang Z, Sparks T, Liou F, Newkirk J (2017) Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing. In: Brandt M (ed) Laser additive manufacturing. Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials, Elsevier, pp 351–371

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalid M, Peng Q (2021) Investigation of printing parameters of additive manufacturing process for sustainability using design of experiments. J Mech Des. doi 10(1115/1):4049521

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mussatto A (2022) Research progress in multi-material laser-powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a review of the state-of-the-art techniques for depositing multiple powders with spatial selectivity in a single layer. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahito Wahab DA, Azman AH (2019) Additive manufacturing for repair and restoration in remanufacturing: An overview from object design and systems perspectives. Processes:. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7110802

  14. Aziz NA, Adnan NAA, Wahab DA (2021) Component design optimisation based on artificial intelligence in support of additive manufacturing repair and restoration: current status and future outlook for remanufacturing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mok HS, Song HS, Kim DJ, Hong JE, Lee SM, Ahn JT (2015) Determination of failure cause in remanufacturing. Procedia Eng 110:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee J-H, Lee C-M, Kim D-H (2022) Repair of damaged parts using wire arc additive manufacturing in machine tools. J Mater Res Technol 16:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Obeidi MA (2022) Metal additive manufacturing by laser-powder bed fusion: guidelines for process optimisation. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zghair YA, Roland L (2017) Additive repair design approach: case study to repair aluminium base components. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada

  19. Wang L, Chen X, Kang S, Deng X, Jin R (2020) Meta-modeling of high-fidelity FEA simulation for efficient product and process design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 35:101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Traxel KD, Bandyopadhyay A (2021) Modeling and experimental validation of additively manufactured tantalum-titanium bimetallic interfaces. Mater Des 207:100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaezi M, Drescher P, Seitz H (2020) Beamless metal additive manufacturing. Materials 13:922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bidare P, Jimenez A, Hassanin H, Essa K (2022) Porosity, cracks, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured tooling alloys: a review. Adv Manuf 10:175–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-021-00365-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Zhang X, Pan T, Liou F (2022) Component repair using additive manufacturing: experiments and thermal modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08265-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Putra MRA, Pratama PS, Prabowo AR (2021) Failure of friction brake components against rapid braking process: a review on potential challenges and developments. Transp Res Procedia 55:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dabrowski T, Stanczyk, TL (2018) The influence of high energy brake applications on brake disks’ integrity- established by inertia brake dynamometer testing. 2018 XI Int Science-Technical Conf Autom Safety: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS060817

  26. Marwa V (2020) Emergency vehicle brake in case of brake failure. MUST J Res Dev 1:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hirtz M, Ewald J, Murrenhoff H (2015) Experimental investigation of the influence of the supporting mechanism of a self-energizing hydraulic brake on torque oscillations. Proc 2015 Joint Rail Conf. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2015-5742

  28. Bohr EN, Ukpaka CP, Nkoi B (2018) Reliability analysis of an automobile brake system to enhance performance. Int J Prod Eng 4:47–56. https://doi.org/10.37628/ijpe.v4i2.746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulkarni AR, Mahale R (2020) Impact of design factors of disc brake rotor on braking performance. Int J Eng Res Technol 9:1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS060817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Popa M, Capata D, Burnete N (2021) Analysis of defects in the braking systems of commercial vehicles. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng 1169:012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1169/1/012010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tyflopoulos E, Lien M, Steinert M (2021) Optimization of brake calipers using topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murphy BJ, Lebold MS, Banks JC, Reichard K (2006) Diagnostic end to end monitoring & fault detection for braking systems. IEEE Aerospace Conf 2006:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2006.1656130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuber KH, Shahaji YS, Tajuddin SS (2022) Design and fabrication of automatic brake failure indicator using solenoid coil volume. Int J Res Eng Sc 10:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aziz NA, Elanggoven L, Zakaria NAS, Awang N, Kamarulzaman NF, Wahab DA (2022) Assessment on potential damages of automotive brake caliper using FMEA method for the application of remanufacturing process. Malaysian J Sc Adv Tech 2:49–53. https://doi.org/10.56532/mjsat.v2iS1.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang S, To S, Chan CY, Cheung CF, Lee WB (2010) A study of the cutting-induced heating effect on the machined surface in ultra-precision raster milling of 6061 Al alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2613-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yathish KO, Arun LR, Kuldeep B, Muthanna KP (2013) Performance analysis and material optimization of disc brake using MMC. Int J Innov Res Sc Eng Tech 2(8):4101–4108

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aziz NA, Wahab DA, Ramli R (2021) Kelestarian Hayat Komponen Automotif: Strategi Penaiktarafan (Lifecycle sustainability of automotive component: upgrade strategies). Penerbit UKM (UKM Press)

  38. Kandukuri S, Günay EE, Al-Araidah O, Kremer GE (2021) Inventive solutions for remanufacturing using additive manufacturing: ETRIZ. J Clean Prod 305:126992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gottwald RB, Griffiths RJ, Petersen DT, Perry MEJ, Yu HZ (2021) Solid-state metal additive manufacturing for structural repair. Acc Mater Res 2:780–792. https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.1c00098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu B, Zheng H, Wang J, Zhang Y (2020) Geometric model reconstruction and CNC machining for damaged blade repair. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 33(3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1736710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nandwana P, Plotkowski A, Kannan R, Yoder S, Dehoff R (2020) Predicting geometric influences in metal additive manufacturing. Mater Today Commun 25:101174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tirovic M, Sergent N, Campbell J, Roberts P, Vignjevic R (2012) Structural analysis of a commercial vehicle disc brake caliper. Proc Inst Mech Eng D: J Automob Eng 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407011423447

  43. Joshi A, Anand S (2017) Geometric complexity based process selection for hybrid manufacturing. Proc Manuf 10:578–589

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li Y, Su C, Zhu J (2022) Comprehensive review of wire arc additive manufacturing: hardware system, physical process, monitoring, property characterization, application and future prospects. Results Eng 13:100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia with Geran Konsortium Kecemerlangan Penyelidikan [grant numbers JPT(BKP1)1000/016/018/25(72) and KKP/2020/UKM-UKM/2/1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nurhasyimah Abd Aziz, Lenggeswaran Elanggoven, and Dzuraidah Abd Wahab. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nurhasyimah Abd Aziz, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurhasyimah Abd Aziz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz, N.A., Elanggoven, L., Wahab, D.A. et al. Failure-based design validation for effective repair of multi-metal additive manufacturing: the case of remanufacturable brake caliper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 132, 1425–1437 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13425-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13425-x

Keywords

Navigation