Abstract
The inclusion of additive manufacturing (AM) as an automated repair method leads to a sustainable remanufacturing process, which is known as additive repair. Despite its potential in improving the efficiency of repair and restoration, additive repair remains in its infancy and requires a thorough investigation on part design and process parameters. The major concern raised in additive repair is the capability to create perfect bonding between two metals, which will affect the mechanical properties of the complete repaired part. Hence, performing evaluation from the beginning is crucial to validate the feasibility of the process through appropriate structural analysis and to obtain deformation and stress results. Brake caliper housing is selected as a remanufacturable component for case exemplary purposes. Prior to analysis, the potential damages and failures of the brake caliper component were initially evaluated through literature surveys and direct interviews with industry experts where two types of damages were identified, namely, cracks and broken or fractured parts. Then, the validation focuses on comparative analysis of two different conditions of the brake caliper housing: original, and repaired caliper model using finite element analysis in ANSYS. Results indicate that the strength of the repaired caliper model shows equal and higher strength compared with the original model. This result confirms that the repair process through AM can retain or improve the quality of the remanufactured brake caliper housing. Therefore, this paper provides a systematic framework for the evaluation of mechanical properties in multi-metal additive repair with the integration of failure analysis techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Milios L, Matsumoto M (2019) Consumer perception of remanufactured automotive parts and policy implications for transitioning to a circular economy in Sweden. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226264
He Y, Hao C, Li Y, Lim MK, Wang Y (2020) A failure feature identification method for adaptive remanufacturing. Proc CIRP 90:552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.131
Sundin E (2004) Product and process design for successful remanufacturing. PhD Thesis. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Östlin J (2008) On remanufacturing systems: analysing and managing material flows and remanufacturing processes. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Oh WJ, Lee WJ, Kim MS, Jeon JB, Shim DS (2019) Repairing additive-manufactured 316L stainless steel using direct energy deposition. Opt Laser Technol 117:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.04.012
Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15(10):932–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030
Kin STM, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2014) Remanufacturing process planning. Procedia CIRP 15:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.087
Turan E, Koҫal T, Ünlüğenҫoğlu K (2011) Welding technologies in shipbuilding industry. Online J Sci Technol (TOJSAT) 1:24–30
Liu Q, Brandt M, Janardhana M, Cottam R, Matthews N, Sharp PK (2011) Potential application and certification of laser cladding technology for repair of ageing aircraft components. J Laser Appl. https://doi.org/10.2351/15062244
Liu R, Wang Z, Sparks T, Liou F, Newkirk J (2017) Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing. In: Brandt M (ed) Laser additive manufacturing. Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials, Elsevier, pp 351–371
Khalid M, Peng Q (2021) Investigation of printing parameters of additive manufacturing process for sustainability using design of experiments. J Mech Des. doi 10(1115/1):4049521
Mussatto A (2022) Research progress in multi-material laser-powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a review of the state-of-the-art techniques for depositing multiple powders with spatial selectivity in a single layer. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100769
Rahito Wahab DA, Azman AH (2019) Additive manufacturing for repair and restoration in remanufacturing: An overview from object design and systems perspectives. Processes:. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7110802
Aziz NA, Adnan NAA, Wahab DA (2021) Component design optimisation based on artificial intelligence in support of additive manufacturing repair and restoration: current status and future outlook for remanufacturing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126401
Mok HS, Song HS, Kim DJ, Hong JE, Lee SM, Ahn JT (2015) Determination of failure cause in remanufacturing. Procedia Eng 110:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.337
Lee J-H, Lee C-M, Kim D-H (2022) Repair of damaged parts using wire arc additive manufacturing in machine tools. J Mater Res Technol 16:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.156
Obeidi MA (2022) Metal additive manufacturing by laser-powder bed fusion: guidelines for process optimisation. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100473
Zghair YA, Roland L (2017) Additive repair design approach: case study to repair aluminium base components. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada
Wang L, Chen X, Kang S, Deng X, Jin R (2020) Meta-modeling of high-fidelity FEA simulation for efficient product and process design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 35:101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101211
Traxel KD, Bandyopadhyay A (2021) Modeling and experimental validation of additively manufactured tantalum-titanium bimetallic interfaces. Mater Des 207:100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109793
Vaezi M, Drescher P, Seitz H (2020) Beamless metal additive manufacturing. Materials 13:922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040922
Bidare P, Jimenez A, Hassanin H, Essa K (2022) Porosity, cracks, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured tooling alloys: a review. Adv Manuf 10:175–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-021-00365-y
Li L, Zhang X, Pan T, Liou F (2022) Component repair using additive manufacturing: experiments and thermal modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08265-y
Putra MRA, Pratama PS, Prabowo AR (2021) Failure of friction brake components against rapid braking process: a review on potential challenges and developments. Transp Res Procedia 55:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.096
Dabrowski T, Stanczyk, TL (2018) The influence of high energy brake applications on brake disks’ integrity- established by inertia brake dynamometer testing. 2018 XI Int Science-Technical Conf Autom Safety: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS060817
Marwa V (2020) Emergency vehicle brake in case of brake failure. MUST J Res Dev 1:233–246
Hirtz M, Ewald J, Murrenhoff H (2015) Experimental investigation of the influence of the supporting mechanism of a self-energizing hydraulic brake on torque oscillations. Proc 2015 Joint Rail Conf. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2015-5742
Bohr EN, Ukpaka CP, Nkoi B (2018) Reliability analysis of an automobile brake system to enhance performance. Int J Prod Eng 4:47–56. https://doi.org/10.37628/ijpe.v4i2.746
Kulkarni AR, Mahale R (2020) Impact of design factors of disc brake rotor on braking performance. Int J Eng Res Technol 9:1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS060817
Popa M, Capata D, Burnete N (2021) Analysis of defects in the braking systems of commercial vehicles. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng 1169:012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1169/1/012010
Tyflopoulos E, Lien M, Steinert M (2021) Optimization of brake calipers using topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041437
Murphy BJ, Lebold MS, Banks JC, Reichard K (2006) Diagnostic end to end monitoring & fault detection for braking systems. IEEE Aerospace Conf 2006:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2006.1656130
Kuber KH, Shahaji YS, Tajuddin SS (2022) Design and fabrication of automatic brake failure indicator using solenoid coil volume. Int J Res Eng Sc 10:8–13
Aziz NA, Elanggoven L, Zakaria NAS, Awang N, Kamarulzaman NF, Wahab DA (2022) Assessment on potential damages of automotive brake caliper using FMEA method for the application of remanufacturing process. Malaysian J Sc Adv Tech 2:49–53. https://doi.org/10.56532/mjsat.v2iS1.118
Wang S, To S, Chan CY, Cheung CF, Lee WB (2010) A study of the cutting-induced heating effect on the machined surface in ultra-precision raster milling of 6061 Al alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2613-7
Yathish KO, Arun LR, Kuldeep B, Muthanna KP (2013) Performance analysis and material optimization of disc brake using MMC. Int J Innov Res Sc Eng Tech 2(8):4101–4108
Aziz NA, Wahab DA, Ramli R (2021) Kelestarian Hayat Komponen Automotif: Strategi Penaiktarafan (Lifecycle sustainability of automotive component: upgrade strategies). Penerbit UKM (UKM Press)
Kandukuri S, Günay EE, Al-Araidah O, Kremer GE (2021) Inventive solutions for remanufacturing using additive manufacturing: ETRIZ. J Clean Prod 305:126992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126992
Gottwald RB, Griffiths RJ, Petersen DT, Perry MEJ, Yu HZ (2021) Solid-state metal additive manufacturing for structural repair. Acc Mater Res 2:780–792. https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.1c00098
Wu B, Zheng H, Wang J, Zhang Y (2020) Geometric model reconstruction and CNC machining for damaged blade repair. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 33(3):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1736710
Nandwana P, Plotkowski A, Kannan R, Yoder S, Dehoff R (2020) Predicting geometric influences in metal additive manufacturing. Mater Today Commun 25:101174
Tirovic M, Sergent N, Campbell J, Roberts P, Vignjevic R (2012) Structural analysis of a commercial vehicle disc brake caliper. Proc Inst Mech Eng D: J Automob Eng 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407011423447
Joshi A, Anand S (2017) Geometric complexity based process selection for hybrid manufacturing. Proc Manuf 10:578–589
Li Y, Su C, Zhu J (2022) Comprehensive review of wire arc additive manufacturing: hardware system, physical process, monitoring, property characterization, application and future prospects. Results Eng 13:100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100330
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia with Geran Konsortium Kecemerlangan Penyelidikan [grant numbers JPT(BKP1)1000/016/018/25(72) and KKP/2020/UKM-UKM/2/1].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nurhasyimah Abd Aziz, Lenggeswaran Elanggoven, and Dzuraidah Abd Wahab. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nurhasyimah Abd Aziz, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aziz, N.A., Elanggoven, L., Wahab, D.A. et al. Failure-based design validation for effective repair of multi-metal additive manufacturing: the case of remanufacturable brake caliper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 132, 1425–1437 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13425-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13425-x