Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal design method for geometric errors of horizontal machining center based on Sobol method and IPSO

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geometric error is one of the important factors for evaluating the performance of a machine tool, which should be seriously regulated through appropriate accuracy design. This paper proposes a rapid precision design method for horizontal machining center based on Sobol sensitivity analysis method and improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO). Firstly, the geometric error models are established using multi-body system theory and homogenous transformation matrix method. Subsequently, the Sobol method is taken to analyze the sensitivity of geometric errors and their coupling effects, and the sensitivity coefficients are substituted into the objective function of cost-tolerance model. Finally, a multi-objective optimization approach with nonlinear constraints is proposed by comprehensively considering the trade-off between cost and accuracy. An improved particle swarm optimization is applied for the optimization, which can effectively and rapidly obtain the optimal allocation of geometric errors by varying parameters in each iteration and judging the constrains after iteration process. This method provides valuable guidance for accuracy design of machine tools in the manufacturing industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu H, Li X, Sun F, Zhao Y (2022) A status review of volumetric positioning accuracy prediction theory and static accuracy design method for multi-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122:2139–2159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10015-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao G, Jiang S, Dong K, Xu Q, Zhang Z, Lu L (2022) influence analysis of geometric error and compensation method for four-axis machining tools with two rotary axes. Machines 10:586. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10070586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Niu P, Cheng Q, Liu Z, Chu H (2021) A machining accuracy improvement approach for a horizontal machining center based on analysis of geometric error characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:2873–2887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06565-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song W, Ye P, Zhang H, Li B (2022) Fast compensation of spatial PDGE of five-axis machine tools based on error parameter optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122:3351–3364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10072-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhong X, Liu H, Mao X, Li B (2019) An optimal method for improving volumetric error compensation in machine tools based on squareness error identification. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 20:1653–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00191-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miro S, Hartmann D, Schanz T (2014) Global sensitivity analysis for subsoil parameter estimation in mechanized tunneling. Comput Geotech 56:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobol IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simulat 55(1–3):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobol IM, Tarantola S, Gatelli D, Kucherenko SS, Mauntz W (2007) Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 92(7):957–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilal N (2014) Implementation of Sobol’s method of global sensitivity analysis to a compressor simulation model. International Compressor Engineering Conference, Purdue University. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/icec/2385

  10. Zou X, Zhao X, Wang Z, Li G, Hu Z, Sun T (2020) Error distribution of a 5-axis measuring machine based on sensitivity analysis of geometric errors. Math Probl Eng 2020:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8146975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ou Y, Xing YS, Wang K, Zhou CG, Feng HT (2022) Investigation of crucial geometric errors of screw grinder for ball screw profile parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118:533–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07917-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen G, Sun Y, Lu L, Chen W (2016) A new static accuracy design method for ultra-precision machine tool based on global optimization and error sensitivity analysis. Int J Nanomanufacturing 12(2):167–180. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNM.2016.077062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Li T, Sun X, Mynors D, Wu T (2022) Optimal design method for static precision of heavy-duty vertical machining center based on gravity deformation error modelling. Processes 10:1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Z, Cai L, Cheng Q, Liu Z (2019) Gu P (2019) A geometric error budget method to improve machining accuracy reliability of multi-axis machine tools. J Intell Manuf 30:495–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1260-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niu P, Cheng Q, Chang W, Song X, Li Y (2021) Sensitivity analysis of machining accuracy reliability considering partial correlation of geometric errors for horizontal machining center. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 235(3):455–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420958843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong Z, Hu W, Xue D (1994) New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis. ASME J Eng Ind 116(2):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Q, Zhao H, Liu Z, Zhang C, Gu P (2016) Robust geometric accuracy allocation of machine tools to minimize manufacturing costs and quality loss. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 230(15):2728–2744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406215600398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks 4:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Xiang Li, Juntang Yuan, and Zhenhua Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Xiang Li, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juntang Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Yuan, J. & Wang, Z. Optimal design method for geometric errors of horizontal machining center based on Sobol method and IPSO. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 131, 6091–6102 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13097-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13097-7

Keywords

Navigation