Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital twins in additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has surfaced as a pivotal component in the evolving field of intelligent manufacturing, offering an array of benefits compared to conventional production techniques. Nevertheless, the industry grapples with issues relating to manufacturing instability and inconsistent repeatability, making it challenging to meet desired microstructure and performance standards. The optimization of processing variables within specific equipment and parameter sets often necessitates expensive trial-and-error experiments, given the diversity and intricacy of AM process parameters. To mitigate these challenges, the digital twin (DT) technical concept has been implemented to bolster AM by offering real-time projection and mirroring of physical attributes for both the fabricated products and the AM machinery, thereby facilitating real-time feedback control to alleviate AM-induced defects and achieve optimal performance of the manufactured parts. DT techniques streamline process monitoring, performance prediction, anomaly detection, process parameter optimization, and production cost forecasting, thereby enhancing the entire AM process. Within the framework of Industry 4.0, DTs in AM have attracted considerable attention and experienced significant progress. Auxiliary techniques such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analysis, cloud manufacturing, and machine learning (ML) have substantially driven the expansion of DTs in AM. This review’s contribution lies in the comprehensive analysis of how the digital twin (DT) technical concept has been introduced to enhance AM. This review examines existing literature on DTs in AM from six perspectives: background information, structural components, applications, directions for improvement, principal issues encountered, and potential research directions. It identifies current advancements, discusses applications across different domains, suggests areas for improvement, and outlines potential research directions. This review also identifies current advancements, discusses applications across different domains, suggests areas for improvement, and outlines potential research directions. These insights significantly contribute to the understanding and further development of DTs in AM within the context of Industry 4.0, offering a fresh perspective that aligns with the evolution of the intelligent manufacturing industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Code availability

The flow chart presented in the paper can be shared.

References

  1. Kouraytem N, Li X, Tan W, Kappes B, Spear AD (2021) Modeling process-structure-property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: A review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches. J Phys Mater 4:032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b

  2. Geng R, Li M, Hu Z, Han Z, Zheng R (2022) Digital Twin in smart manufacturing: remote control and virtual machining using VR and AR technologies. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03426-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali MH, Issayev G, Shehab E, Sarfraz S (2022) A critical review of 3D printing and digital manufacturing in construction engineering. Rapid Prototyp J 7:1312–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartsch K, Pettke A, Höbert A, Lakämper J, Lange F (2021) On the digital twin application and the role of artificial intelligence in additive manufacturing: a systematic review. J Phys Mater 4:032005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abf3cf

  5. DebRoy T, Zhang W, Turner J, Babu SS (2017) Building digital twins of 3D printing machines. Scr Mater 135:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evangeline P, Anandhakumar (2020) Digital twin technology for “smart manufacturing”. Adv Comput 117:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.10.009

  7. Eisenbarth D, Soffel F, Wegener K (2019) Geometry-based process adaption to fabricate parts with varying wall thickness by direct metal deposition. In: Almeida H, Vasco J (eds) Progress in Digital and Physical Manufacturing. ProDPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29041-2_16

  8. Gunasegaram DR, Murphy AB, Matthews MJ, DebRoy T (2021) The case for digital twins in metal additive manufacturing. J Phys Mater 4:040401. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ac09fb

  9. Chen Z (2020) Understanding of the Modeling Method in Additive Manufacturing. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 711, 2019 International Conference on Optoelectronic Science and Materials 20–22 September 2019, Hefei, China. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/711/1/012017

  10. Gan TH, Kanfoud J, Nedunuri H, Amini A, Feng G (2021) Industry 4.0: Why Machine Learning Matters? In: Gelman L, Martin N, Malcolm AA, (Edmund) Liew CK (eds) Advances in condition monitoring and structural health monitoring. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9199-0_37

  11. Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang W, Zuback JS, Knapp GL, De A, DebRoy T (2021) Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater Sci 116:100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703

  12. Lu Y, Liu C, Wang KIK, Huang H, Xu X (2020) Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 61:101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaikwad A, Yavari R, Montazeri M, Cole K, Bian L, Rao P (2020) Toward the digital twin of additive manufacturing: integrating thermal simulations, sensing, and analytics to detect process faults. IISE Trans 52:1204–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2019.1701753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phua A, Davies CHJ, Delaney GW (2022) A digital twin hierarchy for metal additive manufacturing. Comput Ind 140:103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Osho J, Hyre A, Pantelidakis M, Ledford A, Harris G, Liu J, Mykoniatis K (2022) Four Rs Framework for the development of a digital twin: the implementation of Representation with a FDM manufacturing machine. J Manuf Syst 63:370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shrivastava A, Mukherjee S, Chakraborty SS (2021) Addressing the challenges in remanufacturing by laser-based material deposition techniques. Opt Laser Technol 144:107404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang L, Özel T (2021) Physics-based simulation models for digital twin development in laser powder bed fusion. Int J Mechatronics Manuf Syst 14:143–163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMS.2021.119155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pantelidakis M, Mykoniatis K, Liu J, Harris G (2022) A digital twin ecosystem for additive manufacturing using a real-time development platform. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:6547–6563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09164-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Corradini F, Silvestri M (2022) Design and testing of a digital twin for monitoring and quality assessment of material extrusion process. Addit Manuf 51:102633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102633

  20. Sieber I, Thelen R, Gengenbach U (2021) Enhancement of high-resolution 3d inkjet-printing of optical freeform surfaces using digital twins. Micromachines 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12010035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li J, Yuan S, Zhu J, Zhang W, Li S (2021) Numerical investigation of novel process planning in the polymeric powder bed fusion. J Manuf Process 67:195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukherjee T, DebRoy T (2019) A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components. Appl Mater Today 14:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qi Q, Tao F (2018) Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access 6:3585–3593. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Knapp GL, Mukherjee T, Zuback JS, Wei HL, Palmer TA, De A, DebRoy T (2017) Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 135:390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.039

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reisch RT, Hauser T, Lutz B, Tsakpinis A, Winter D, Kamps T, Knoll A (2022) Context awareness in process monitoring of additive manufacturing using a digital twin. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:3483–3500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08636-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chhetri SR, Faezi S, Canedo A, Faruque MA Al (2019) QUILT: quality inference from living digital twins in IoT-enabled manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3302505.3310085

  27. Scheffel RM, Fröhlich AA, Silvestri M (2021) Automated fault detection for additive manufacturing using vibration sensors. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 34:500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1901316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Min Q, Lu Y, Liu Z, Su C, Wang B (2019) Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry. Int J Inf Manage 49:502–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elambasseril J, Brandt M (2022) Artificial intelligence: way forward to empower metal additive manufacturing product development—an overview. Mater Today Proc 58:461–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Winton HC, Cegla F, Hooper PA (2021) A method for objectively evaluating the defect detection performance of in-situ monitoring systems. Addit Manuf 48:102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Müller JR, Panarotto M, Malmqvist J, Isaksson O (2018) Lifecycle design and management of additive manufacturing technologies. Procedia Manuf 19:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu C, Le Roux L, Körner C, Tabaste O, Lacan F, Bigot S (2022) Digital twin-enabled collaborative data management for metal additive manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 62:857–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo L, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wan C, Liang J (2021) Development of cloud-edge collaborative digital twin system for FDM additive manufacturing. In: 2021 IEEE 19th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN45523.2021.9557492

  34. Yi L, Glatt M, Ehmsen S, Duan W, Aurich JC (2021) Process monitoring of economic and environmental performance of a material extrusion printer using an augmented reality-based digital twin. Addit Manuf 48:102388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102388

  35. Yavari R, Riensche A, Tekerek E, Jacquemetton L, Halliday H, Vandever M, Tenequer A, Perumal V, Kontsos A, Smoqi Z, Cole K, Rao P (2021) Digitally twinned additive manufacturing: detecting flaws in laser powder bed fusion by combining thermal simulations with in-situ meltpool sensor data. Mater Des 211:110167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Balta EC, Tilbury DM, Barton K (2019) A digital twin framework for performance monitoring and anomaly detection in fused deposition modeling. In 2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2019.8843166

  37. Copertaro E, Estupinan Donoso AA, Peters B (2018) A comparison between discrete analysis and a multiphase approach for predicting heat conduction in packed beds. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation (ICCMS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/3177457.3177497

  38. Zou R, Liang X, Chen Q, Wang M, Zaghloul MAS, Lan H, Buric MP, Ohodnicki PR, Chorpening B, To AC, Chen KP (2020) A digital twin approach to study additive manufacturing processing using embedded optical fiber sensors and numerical modeling. J Light Technol 38:6402–6411. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.3010722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Özen A, Abali BE, Völlmecke C, Gerstel J, Auhl D (2021) Exploring the role of manufacturing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties in fused deposition modeling (FDM) using PETG. Appl Compos Mater 28:1799–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09940-9

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang H, Ma N, Chen J, Feng Z, Murakawa H (2020) Toward large-scale simulation of residual stress and distortion in wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 34:101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gawade V, Singh V, Guo W “Grace” (2022) Leveraging simulated and empirical data-driven insight to supervised-learning for porosity prediction in laser metal deposition. J Manuf Syst 62:875–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Anderson AM, Van Der Merwe A (2021) Time-driven activity-based costing related to digital twinning in additive manufacturing. South African J Ind Eng 32:37–43. https://doi.org/10.7166/32-1-2271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ertz M, Sun S, Boily E, Kubiat P, Quenum GGY (2022) How transitioning to Industry 4.0 promotes circular product lifetimes. Ind Mark Manag 101:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu CY, Pires JN, Azar A (2020) A novel multi-brand robotic software interface for industrial additive manufacturing cells. Ind Rob 47:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-11-2019-0237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu L, Johnsson C, Mejvik J, Varisco M, Schiraldi M (2018) Key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management in the process industry. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2017. IEEE, Singapore, pp 969–973. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290036

  46. Klingaa CG, Mohanty S, Funch CV, Hjermitslev AB, Haahr-Lillevang L, Hattel JH (2021) Towards a digital twin of laser powder bed fusion with a focus on gas flow variables. J Manuf Process 65:312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nagar SV, Chandrashekar AC, Suvarna M (2020) Optimized additive manufacturing technology using digital twins and cyber physical systems. Cyber-Phys Syst Digit Twins: Proc 16th Int Conf Remote Eng Virtual Instrum 16:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23162-0_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stavropoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Michail CK, Chryssolouris G (2021) Robust additive manufacturing performance through a control oriented digital twin. Metals 11(5):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050708

  49. Heo TW, Khairallah SA, Shi R, Berry J, Perron A, Calta NP, Martin AA, Barton NR, Roehling J, Roehling T, Fattebert JL, Anderson A, Nichols AL, Wopschall S, King WE, McKeown JT, Matthews MJ (2021) A mesoscopic digital twin that bridges length and time scales for control of additively manufactured metal microstructures. J Phys Mater 4:034012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abeef8

  50. Agius D, O’Toole P, Wallbrink C, Sterjovski Z, Wang CH, Schaffer GB (2021) Integrating phase field and crystal plasticity finite element models for simulations of titanium alloy Ti-5553. J Phys Mater 4:044014. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f

  51. Liu X, Kan C, Ye Z (2022) Real-time multiscale prediction of structural performance in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 49:102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chiang Y, Chiu TW, Chang SW (2022) ImageMech: from image to particle spring network for mechanical characterization. Front Mater 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.803875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu J, Sheng H, Zhang S, Tian J, Deng J (2021) Surface accuracy optimization of mechanical parts with multiple circular holes for additive manufacturing based on triangular fuzzy number. Front Mech Eng 16:133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0610-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ertveldt J, Guillaume P, Helsen J (2020) MiCLAD as a platform for real-time monitoring and machine learning in laser metal deposition. Procedia CIRP 94:456–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Adeyeye A, Lynch C, He X, Lee S, Cressler JD, Tentzeris MM (2021) Fully inkjet printed 60GHz backscatter 5G RFID modules for sensing and localization in internet of things (IoT) and digital twins applications. In: 2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 1193-1198. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC32696.2021.00195

  56. Lu Y, Shevtshenko E, Wang Y (2021) Physics-based compressive sensing to enable digital twins of additive manufacturing processes. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 21:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050377

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gunasegaram DR, Murphy AB, Barnard A, DebRoy T, Matthews MJ, Ladani L, Gu D (2021) Towards developing multiscale-multiphysics models and their surrogates for digital twins of metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 46:102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102089

  58. Montoya-Zapata D, Rodríguez JM, Moreno A, Posada J, Ruiz-Salguero O (2021) 2D linear finite element simulation of laser metal heating for digital twins. Int J Simul Multidiscip Des Optim 12:11. https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2021011

  59. Roehling TT, Shi R, Khairallah SA, Roehling JD, Guss GM, McKeown JT, Matthews MJ (2020) Controlling grain nucleation and morphology by laser beam shaping in metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 195:109071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cai Y, Wang Y, Burnett M (2020) Using augmented reality to build digital twin for reconfigurable additive manufacturing system. J Manuf Syst 56:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mandolla C, Petruzzelli AM, Percoco G, Urbinati A (2019) Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: a case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput Ind 109:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Guo D, Ling S, Li H, Ao D, Zhang T, Rong Y, Huang GQ (2020) A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. In: 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, Hong Kong, China, pp 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.1109/CASE48305.2020.9216732

  63. Guo W “Grace,” Tian Q, Guo S, Guo Y (2020) A physics-driven deep learning model for process-porosity causal relationship and porosity prediction with interpretability in laser metal deposition. CIRP Ann 69:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mehta P, Rao P, Wu ZD, Jovanović V, Wodo O, Kuttolamadom M (2018) Smart manufacturing: state-of-the-art review in context of conventional and modern manufacturing process modeling, monitoring and control. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. Volume 3: Manufacturing Equipment and Systems. ASME, College Station, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2018-6658

Download references

Funding

This review paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52175140), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFB4602102), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China (Grant No. JKG01231610), Pre research project of Civil Aerospace Technology (Grant No. D020301), and Equipment Pre-research Sharing Technology Key Project (Grant No. JZX7Y20210422004601).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

    Tao Shen & Bo Li

  2. Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for High-End Equipment Reliability, Shanghai, 200237, China

    Bo Li

  3. Additive Manufacturing and Intelligent Equipment Research Institute, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

    Bo Li

Authors
  1. Tao Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tao Shen: writing-original draft, visualization; Bo Li: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors state that the present work is in compliance with the ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, T., Li, B. Digital twins in additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 131, 63–92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13092-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13092-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation