Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time closed-loop control of molten pool transient area in direct laser deposition via PID algorithm with enhanced robustness

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the direct laser deposition (DLD) process, it is common to employ constant processing parameters. The utilization of the constant parameters may lead to fluctuations in the dynamic evolution of the molten pool, primarily due to the intricate thermal effects involved, which will significantly impact the processing quality. To address this issue, this study proposed a closed-loop control approach that effectively modifies processing parameters in real time by targeting on the molten pool transient area. The type of the laser used in this study is a flat-top beam. Laser power, powder feeder rate, and scanning speed are the input variables of the study to control molten pool, considering the manufacturing system. The most suitable processing parameter to control the molten pool area was found to be the laser power by a set of orthogonal experiments, with a correlation coefficient of 0.706, and significance level of 0.002. Then, the dynamic response relationship between laser power and the molten pool area was mathematically characterized by a third-order transfer function model to simplify the complex physical model of the DLD process. Subsequently, a PID controller with a filtering coefficient and anti-windup compensation was chosen compared with the other controller. In the validation experiments, it was observed that the closed-loop processing group demonstrated improved stability in maintaining the molten pool transient area, with a notable decrease of 33.7% in variability compared to the open-loop processing group. As a result, the deposited layer of the closed-loop processing group exhibited a much more satisfying surface quality and heat affect zone than the open-loop group. This study established a third-order mathematical model of the dynamic molten pool and realized the optimization of deposition quality by controlling the molten pool transient area with an enhanced PID controller, providing a fundamental basis for improving the consistency of the direct laser deposition processing quality through the implementation of real-time feedback control of molten pool physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N et al (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics[J/OL]. Addit Manuf 8:36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Oliveira ASCM, da Silva PSCP, Vilar RMC (2002) Microstructural features of consecutive layers of Stellite 6 deposited by laser cladding[J/OL]. Surf Coat Technol 153(2):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01687-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis TA, Shin YC (2011) Vision-based clad height measurement[J/OL]. Mach Vis Appl 22(1):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-009-0240-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sobhanieh N, Akbari J, Moradi M (2022) A new method for calculating laser intensity distribution on workpiece surface in laser-directed energy deposition process by considering powder stream distribution and laser attenuation[J/OL]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 121(1–2):337–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09301-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng L, Wang A, Tsung F (2018) A prediction and compensation scheme for in-plane shape deviation of additive manufacturing with information on process parameters[J/OL]. IISE Transactions 50(5):394–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2017.1402224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu Y, Chen H, Liang X et al (2021) Monitoring molten pool temperature, grain size and molten pool plasma with integrated area of the spectrum during laser additive manufacturing[J/OL]. J Manuf Process 64:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma D, Jiang P, Shu L et al (2022) Real-time porosity monitoring during laser welding of aluminum alloys based on keyhole 3D morphology characteristics[J/OL]. J Manuf Syst 65:70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li K, Zhou H, Zhao Z et al (2021) A study on transient molten pool dynamics in laser polishing of Ti6Al4V using numerical simulation[J/OL]. J Manuf Process 65:478–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai Y, Xiong J, Chen H et al (2023) A review of in-situ monitoring and process control system in metal-based laser additive manufacturing[J/OL]. J Manuf Syst 70:309–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maffia S, Furlan V, Previtali B (2023) Coaxial and synchronous monitoring of molten pool height, area, and temperature in laser metal deposition[J/OL]. Opt Laser Technol 163:109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L et al (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control[J/OL]. Addit Manuf 8:12–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akbari M, Kovacevic R (2019) Closed loop control of melt pool width in robotized laser powder–directed energy deposition process[J/OL]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):2887–2898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04195-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salehi D, Brandt M (2006) Melt pool temperature control using LabVIEW in Nd:YAG laser blown powder cladding process[J/OL]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(3–4):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2514-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyagi M, Tsukamoto T, Kawanaka H (2014) Adaptive shape control of laser-deposited metal structures by adjusting weld pool size[J/OL]. J Laser Appl 26(3):032003. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4869499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nassar AR, Keist JS, Reutzel EW et al (2015) Intra-layer closed-loop control of build plan during directed energy additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V[J/OL]. Addit Manuf 6:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farshidianfar MH, Khodabakhshi F, Khajepour A et al (2021) Closed-loop control of microstructure and mechanical properties in additive manufacturing by directed energy deposition[J/OL]. Mater Sci Eng A 803:140483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zijue T, Weiwei L, Zhaorui Y et al (2019) Study on evolution behavior of geometrical accuracy based on dynamic characteristics of molten pool in laser-based direct energy deposition[J/OL]. J Mech Eng 55(15):39. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2019.15.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanafer K, Al-Masri A, Aithal S et al (2019) Multiphysics modeling and simulation of laser additive manufacturing process[J/OL]. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 13(2):537–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0520-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Panwisawas C, Tang YT, Reed RC (2020) Metal 3D printing as a disruptive technology for superalloys[J/OL]. Nat Commun 11(1):2327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16188-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Doumanidis C, Kwak YM (2001) Geometry modeling and control by infrared and laser sensing in thermal manufacturing with material deposition[J/OL]. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1344898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang L, Landers RG (2010) Melt pool temperature control for laser metal deposition processes—Part II: Layer-to-layer temperature control[J/OL]. J Manuf Sci Eng 132(1):011011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah P, Agashe S (2016) Review of fractional PID controller[J/OL]. Mechatronics 38:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yokoyama M, Kim GN, Tsuchiya M (2010) Integral sliding mode control with anti-windup compensation and its application to a power assist system[J/OL]. J Vib Control 16(4):503–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309106143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Shariff HM, Rahiman MHF, Adnan R et al (2019) The PID integrated anti-windup scheme by Ziegler-Nichols tuning for small-scale steam distillation process[J/OL]. 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 2019, pp. 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEngT.2019.8906436

  25. Priandiri VP, Marham QC, Trilaksono BR et al (2019) Control system for simplified nonlinear dynamic model of 6 DOF hybrid underwater glider using PID controller with anti-windup[J/OL]. 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 2019, pp.50–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEngT.2019.8906440

  26. Xu ZX, Chow KW (2016) Breathers and rogue waves for a third order nonlocal partial differential equation by a bilinear transformation[J/OL]. Appl Math Lett 56:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2015.12.016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 52175455, 51975100), the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Dalian (no.2020JJ26GX040), and the University-Industry Collaborative Education Program of China (no. 230800676014006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BL: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing.

WL: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing.

YX: validation, writing—review and editing.

YH: visualization, writing—review and editing.

YL: validation, writing—review and editing.

YZ: supervision, writing—review and editing.

HL: validation, writing—review and editing.

ZW: validation, writing—review and editing.

WL: visualization.

JS: supervision.

ZM: visualization.

ZL: investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Liu, W., Xia, Y. et al. Real-time closed-loop control of molten pool transient area in direct laser deposition via PID algorithm with enhanced robustness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130, 4529–4542 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13002-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13002-2

Keywords

Navigation