Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A pragmatic optimization-based approach for analysis and configuration of a reconfigurable multi-product assembly line in the automotive industry

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing product variety and fluctuating demand have led to the need of assembly systems that can adapt to multiple different products as the return of investment for dedicated assembly lines is more and more difficult to achieve. In response to this challenge, the paradigm of reconfigurable assembly systems has emerged. However, configuring and optimizing these systems still pose challenges in the industry. This paper proposes a new simple optimization approach for the configuration analysis and optimization of a reconfigurable multi-product assembly system in the automotive industry, using configuration selection, task allocation, and sequencing. Its effectiveness is validated throughout three real industrial study cases in the automotive supplier industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

As only real production data of the industrial partner company has been used, no data set can be provided due to confidentiality issues.

References

  1. Koren Y (2010) The global manufacturing revolution: product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Michalos G, Makris S, Papakostas N et al (2010) Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2009.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovanova F et al (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48:527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63232-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Napoleone A, Pozzetti A, Macchi M (2018) A framework to manage reconfigurability in manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56:3815–3837. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1437286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michalos G, Makris S, Chryssolouris G (2015) The new assembly system paradigm. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28:1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.964323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rösiö C, Aslam T, Srikanth KB, Shetty S (2019) Towards an assessment criterion of reconfigurable manufacturing systems within the automotive industry. Procedia Manufacturing. Elsevier Science, Nantes, France, pp 76–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lafou M, Mathieu L, Pois S, Alochet M (2016) Manufacturing system flexibility: product flexibility assessment. Procedia CIRP 41:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bi ZM, Lang SYT, Shen W, Wang L (2008) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: the state of the art. Int J Prod Res 46:967–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600905646

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Michalos G, Fysikopoulos A, Makris S et al (2015) Multi criteria assembly line design and configuration – an automotive case study. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 9:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michalos G, Makris S, Mourtzis D (2012) An intelligent search algorithm-based method to derive assembly line design alternatives. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 25:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.627949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bi ZM, Wang L, Lang SYT (2007) Current status of reconfigurable assembly systems. IJMR 2:303. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMR.2007.014727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13:121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0483-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst 49:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brahimi N, Dolgui A, Gurevsky E, Yelles-Chaouche A (2019) A literature review of optimization problems for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yelles-Chaouche A, Gurevsky E, Brahimi N, Dolgui A (2021) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems from an optimisation perspective: a focused review of literature. Int J Prod Res 59:6400–6418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1813913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:2137–2156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2361-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2015) A new robustness index formachines selection in Reconfigurable Manufacturing System. In: 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM). IEEE, Seville, Spain, 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM.2015.7380279

  18. Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017) Flexibility-based multi-objective approach for machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under unavailability constraints. Int J Prod Res 55:6033–6051. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1321802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an Archived Multi-Objective Simulated Annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:729–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0803-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bensmaine A, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2013) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based approach for optimal machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 66:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bryan A, Wang H, Abell JA (2013) Concurrent design of product families and reconfigurable assembly systems. J Mech Design - Trans ASME 135:0510011–0510016. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi Y-C, Xirouchakis P (2015) A holistic production planning approach in a reconfigurable manufacturing system with energy consumption and environmental effects. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.902106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2009) Graph theory-based approach to optimize single-product flow-line configurations of RMS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:916–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1541-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2009) Precedence graph-oriented approach to optimise single-product flow-line configurations of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 22:923–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920902870650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2010) Optimisation for multi-part flow-line configuration of reconfigurable manufacturing system using GA. Int J Prod Res 48:4071–4100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903036305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2011) A GA-based approach for optimizing single-part flow-line configurations of RMS. J Intell Manuf 22:301–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0305-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dou J, Li J, Su C (2016) Bi-objective optimization of integrating configuration generation and scheduling for reconfigurable flow lines using NSGA-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:1945–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8291-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dou J, Li J, Xia D, Zhao X (2021) A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for integrated configuration design and scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 59:3975–3995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1756507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elbenani B, Ferland JA (2012) An exact method for solving the manufacturing cell formation problem. Int J Prod Res 50:4038–4045. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.588622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using MOPSO and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7760-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalayci CB, Gupta SM (2013) A particle swarm optimization algorithm with neighborhood-based mutation for sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4990-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Özceylan E, Kalayci CB, Güngör A, Gupta SM (2019) Disassembly line balancing problem: a review of the state of the art and future directions. Int J Prod Res 57:4805–4827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1428775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khezri A, Benderbal HH, Benyoucef L (2019) A sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing system designing with focus on environmental hazardous wastes. In: 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, Zaragoza, Spain, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869380

  34. Khezri A, Benderbal HH, Benyoucef L, Dolgui A (2020) Diagnosis on energy and sustainability of reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: a bi-level decomposition approach. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE, Singapore, Singapore, 141–145

  35. Kumar A, Pattanaik LN, Agrawal R (2019) Optimal sequence planning for multi-model reconfigurable assembly systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2826-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li F, Zhang L, Liao TW, Liu Y (2019) Multi-objective optimisation of multi-task scheduling in cloud manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 57:3847–3863. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1538579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu A, Pfund M, Fowler J (2016) Scheduling optimization of task allocation in integrated manufacturing system based on task decomposition. J of Syst Eng Electron 27:422–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEE.2016.00043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu C, Xiang X, Zheng L, Ma J (2018) An integrated model for multi-resource constrained scheduling problem considering multi-product and resource-sharing. Int J Prod Res 56:6491–6511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1363428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maniraj M, Pakkirisamy V, Jeyapaul R (2017) An ant colony optimization–based approach for a single-product flow-line reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 231:1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415585260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ren W, Wen J, Yan Y et al (2021) Multi-objective optimisation for energy-aware flexible job-shop scheduling problem with assembly operations. Int J Prod Res 59:7216–7231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1836421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Müller C, Grunewald M, Spengler TS (2017) Redundant configuration of automated flow lines based on “Industry 4.0”-technologies. J Bus Econ 87:877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0831-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Campos Sabioni R, Daaboul J, Le Duigou J (2022) Concurrent optimisation of modular product and Reconfigurable Manufacturing System configuration: a customer-oriented offer for mass customisation. Int J Prod Res 60:2275–2291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1886369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Saxena LK, Jain PK (2021) Multi-state reconfigurable manufacturing system configuration design with availability consideration. In: Panchal D, Chatterjee P, Pamucar R, Tyagi M (eds) Reliability and Risk Modeling of Engineering Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 57–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2019) Multi-objective sustainable process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: exact and adapted evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Res 57:2531–2547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1522006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Xi S, Smith JM, Chen Q et al (2022) Simultaneous machine selection and buffer allocation in large unbalanced series-parallel production lines. Int J Prod Res 60:2103–2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1884306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xie N, Li A, Xue W (2012) Cooperative optimization of reconfigurable machine tool configurations and production process plan. Chin J Mech Eng 25:982–989. https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2012.05.982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang J, Liu F, Dong Y et al (2022) Multiple-objective optimization of a reconfigurable assembly system via equipment selection and sequence planning. Comput Ind Eng 172:108519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yazdani MA, Khezri A, Benyoucef L (2022) Process and production planning for sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing systems (SRMSs): multi-objective exact and heuristic-based approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:4519–4540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08409-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006) Modelling and optimization of multiple-aspect RMS configurations. Int J Prod Res 44:4929–4958. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600620955

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Optimal configuration selection for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19:67–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-007-9020-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2008) Availability consideration in the optimal selection of multiple-aspect RMS configurations. Int J Prod Res 46:5849–5882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701261626

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Renna P (2019) Evaluation of redundant configurations and backup stations to support fault tolerant flow line design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:825–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2971-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2009) Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: survey, classification and model critique. Eur J Oper Res 192:349–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Petchrompo S, Coit DW, Brintrup A et al (2022) A review of Pareto pruning methods for multi-objective optimization. Comput Ind Eng 167:108022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Marler RT, Arora JS (2010) The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Grodzevich O, Romanko O (2006) Normalization and other topics in multi objective optimization. Fields Institute, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mitchell JE (2008) Integer programming: branch and cut algorithms: branch and cut. In: Floudas CA, Pardalos PM (eds) Encyclopedia of Optimization. Springer, US, Boston, MA, pp 1643–1650

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding by the RDI FlexSpeedFactory, the region Grand Est, and the European Regional Development Fund FEDER as well as the thyssenkrupp Presta France SAS for the cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Université de Lorraine, LCFC, HESAM Université, 57070, Metz, France

    Paul Stief, Meisam Pour-Massahian-Tafti, Jean-Yves Dantan & Ali Siadat

  2. Thyssenkrupp Presta France SAS, 57192, Florange, France

    Guillaume Burgat

Authors
  1. Paul Stief
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Burgat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meisam Pour-Massahian-Tafti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Yves Dantan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Siadat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Stief.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests. 

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stief, P., Burgat, G., Pour-Massahian-Tafti, M. et al. A pragmatic optimization-based approach for analysis and configuration of a reconfigurable multi-product assembly line in the automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 3993–4010 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12545-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation