Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency improvement of automated production line by conversion of subroutine configuration

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Programmable control for automated production is an essential technology for industrial development. In addition, a flexible main control system and scheduling management can significantly improve production efficiency. This study improved a programmable logic controller (PLC) subroutine module and communication methods using the modular production system (MPS) automated workstation developed by Festo to optimize the process of production. First, a simulated production line with feeding, transportation, discrimination, and processing stations was set up in a laboratory. Experiments and tests were performed, and data were collected. Consequently, different program editing and planning methods, such as program modularization, step system, and subroutines of the busbar, were proposed for PLC and automation systems. The design with clearer and more modularized subroutines was used to improve the production line performance and stability and achieve dynamic scheduling to optimize the production line efficiency to meet the demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lüder A, Klostermeyer A, Peschke J, Bratoukhine A, Sauter T (2005) Distributed automation: PABADIS versus HMS. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 1(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rzevski G (2003) On conceptual design of intelligent mechatronic systems. Mechatronics 13(10):1029–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu YQ, Xu X, Wang LH (2020) Smart manufacturing process and system automation - a critical review of the standards and envisioned scenarios. J Manuf Syst 56:312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Giallanza A (2021) Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: a systematic review and future research directions. Appl Sci 11(12):5725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger T, Fay A, Wagner T, Loewen U (2011) Mining technical dependencies throughout engineering process knowledge. In: 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Emerging Techn. Factory Automation (ETFA), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEC 61131-3 (1990) Programmable logic controllers – Part 3: programming Lan- guages IEC Standard 61131–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feldmann S, Fuchs J, Vogel-Heuser B (2012) Modularity, variant and version man- agement in plant automation – future challenges and state of the art. In: 12th International Design Conference (DESIGN) pp.1689–1698.

  8. Seol H, Kim C, Lee C, Park Y (2007) Design process modularization: concept and algorithm. Concurr Eng Res Appl 15(2):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kong FB, Ming XG, Wang L, Wang XH, Wang PP (2009) On modular products development. Concurr Eng Res Appl 17(4):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaik AM, Rao VVSK, Rao CS (2015) Development of modular manufacturing systems-a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):789–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldea M, Edgar TF, Stanley BL, Kiss AA (2017) Modular manufacturing processes: status, challenges, and opportunities. AICHE J 63(10):4262–4272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedrich J, Scheifele S, Verl A, Lechler A (2015) Flexible and modular control and manufacturing system. Procedia CIRP 33:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel-Heuser B, Fischer J, Rösch S, Feldmann S, Ulewicz S (2015) Challenges for maintenance of PLC-software and its related hardware for automated production systems: selected industrial case studies. In: 31st IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp 362–371

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vogel-Heuser B, Fischer J, Feldmann S, Ulewicz S, Rösch S (2017) Modularity and architecture of PLC-based software for automated production systems: an analysis in industrial companies. J Syst Softw 131:35–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hajarnavis V, Young K (2008) An investigation into programmable logic controller software design techniques in the automotive industry. Assem Autom 28(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer J, Friedrich D, Vogel-Heuser B (2015) Configuration of PLC software for automated warehouses based on reusable components –an industrial case study. In: 20th IEEE Int. Conf. Emerging Techn. Factory Automation (ETFA), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu X (2007) Programmable logic controller application technology. Higher Education Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prasad D, Jayswal SC (2018) Reconfigurability consideration and scheduling of products in a manufacturing industry. Int J Prod Res 56(19):6430–6449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson M (2011) Festo drives automation forwards. Assem Autom 31(1):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan (Grant numbers NSTC 112-2221-E-027-051-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Vehicle Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan

    Po-Tuan Chen

  2. Technical and Vocational Program in Mechatronics, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan

    Po-Tuan Chen & Yu-Lin Cheng

Authors
  1. Po-Tuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Lin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Tuan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, PT., Cheng, YL. Efficiency improvement of automated production line by conversion of subroutine configuration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 3537–3547 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12542-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12542-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation