Skip to main content
Log in

Material removal stability of fixed abrasive tool polishing based on line scanning

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maintaining the stability of material removal function has important implications for deterministic material removal processing. In this paper, the stability of material removal function for fixed abrasive tool polishing TC4 titanium alloy was studied by line scanning based on the polishing platform with the force-position hybrid control. The concept of curve similarity was introduced, and relative peak variation and average profile variation were proposed to quantify the change of material removal profile over time in fixed abrasive tool during the polishing process. Furthermore, material removal simulation model of line scanning was established. The influence rule of elastic layer material properties of fixed abrasive tool on profile of material removal and polishing stability was obtained. The experiment results indicated that the differences between the simulation material removal profile and the experiment results are small, as the hardness of the elastic layer of fixed abrasive tool increases, the width of the material removal profile decreases and the maximum removal depth increases. The relative peak variation and the average profile variation of fixed abrasive tool for elastic layer with Shore hardness of 50A are 0.125 ~ 0.176 and 0.253 ~ 0.326, respectively. The change range of material removal profile variation is small, and the similarity of the profile curve is high. The polishing stability evaluation index based on curve similarity can effectively quantify the time-varying nature of material removal profile of fixed abrasive tool, which provides a new evaluation index for the design and optimization of fixed abrasive tool for grinding and polishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li H, Huang H-Z, Li Y-F, Zhou J, Mi J (2018) Physics of failure-based reliability prediction of turbine blades using multi-source information fusion. Appl Soft Comput 72:624–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li C, Wu B, Zhang Z, Zhang Y (2022) A novel process planning method of 3 + 2-axis additive manufacturing for aero-engine blade based on machine learning. J Intell Manuf 34:2027–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01898-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2012) Multi-objective process optimization for micro-end milling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:903–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3980-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu D, Wang H, Zhang K, Lin X (2019) Research on formation mechanism and optimization method of surface waviness of TC4 blisk blade. J Manuf Process 39:305–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klocke F, Soo SL, Karpuschewski B, Webster JA, Novovic D, Elfizy A, Axinte DA, Tönissen S (2015) Abrasive machining of advanced aerospace alloys and composites. CIRP Ann 64:581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Zou L, Luo G, Lv C, Huang Y (2022) A novel selected force controlling method for improving robotic grinding accuracy of complex curved blade. ISA Trans 129:642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liao L, Zhang Z, Meng F, Liu D, Liu J, Li Y, Cui X (2021) Novel rotary chemical mechanical polishing on an integral impeller. J Manuf Process 66:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Z, Shi Y, Lin X, Yu T, Zhao P, Kang C, He X, Li H (2019) Analysis and optimization of process parameter intervals for surface quality in polishing Ti-6Al-4V blisk blade. Results Phys 12:870–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Z, Zou L, Yin J, Huang Y (2020) Investigation of parametric control method and model in abrasive belt grinding of nickel-based superalloy blade. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:3301–3311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05607-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lv C, Zou L, Huang Y, Li H, Wang T, Mu Y (2022) A novel toolpath for robotic adaptive grinding of extremely thin blade edge based on dwell time model. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 27:4429–4439. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2022.3156804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huai W, Lin X (2020) An optimization study of polishing efficiency of blisk and its technological parameters. Sci Prog 103:36850420957850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850420957850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huai W, Shi Y, Tang H, Lin X (2017) Sensitivity of surface roughness to flexible polishing parameters of abrasive cloth wheel and their optimal intervals. J Mech Sci Technol 31:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-0140-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu D, Shi Y, Lin X, Xian C, Gu Z (2020) Polishing surface integrity of TC17 aeroengine blades. J Mech Sci Technol 34:689–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0114-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burge DWKS-WKJH (2009) Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions. Optics Express 17:21850–21866. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.021850

  15. Hu H, Qi E, Luo X, Zhang X, Xue D (2018) Rapid fabrication strategy for O1.5 m off-axis parabolic parts using computer-controlled optical surfacing. Appl Opt 57:F37–F43. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.000F37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yifan Dai CS, Peng X, Shi F (2010) Calibration and prediction of removal function in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 49:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.000298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Satake U, Enomoto T, Miyagawa T, Ohsumi T, Nakagawa H, Funabashi K (2019) Achieving stable removal rate in polishing with small tools. Precis Eng 55:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burge DWKJH (2010) Rigid conformal polishing tool using non-linear visco-elastic effect. Opt Express 18:2242–2257. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.002242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suratwala T, Menapace J, Steele R, Wong L, Tham G, Ray N, Bauman B, Gregory M, Hordin T (2021) Mechanisms influencing and prediction of tool influence function spots during hemispherical sub-aperture tool polishing on fused silica. Appl Opt 60:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.410903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin B, Jiang X-M, Cao Z-C, Huang T (2019) Development and theoretical analysis of novel center-inlet computer-controlled polishing process for high-efficiency polishing of optical surfaces. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 59:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones RA (1995) Computer simulation of smoothing during computer-controlled optical polishing. Appl Opt 34:1162–1169. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.001162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones RA (1980) Computer controlled polisher demonstration. Appl Opt 19:2072–2076. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.19.002072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu C, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhu Y (2021) Effect of offset on polishing surface shape convergence efficiency of the fixed abrasive tool head. Surf Technol 50:130–139. https://doi.org/10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2021.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wan Y, Pu M, Luo X, Li X, Fan B, Plummer WT, Guan F, Du H, Xie X, Song C, liang l (2019) Optimization of motion mode for improving the stability of removal function, 9th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies: Advanced Optical Manufacturing Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2505141

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U20A20293).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CX conducted various theoretical studies, designed the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. WZ participated in the experimental work. YZ and YZ contributed to the review and edit for the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yun Zhang or Yongwei Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y. et al. Material removal stability of fixed abrasive tool polishing based on line scanning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 2351–2360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12417-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12417-7

Keywords

Navigation