Skip to main content
Log in

Study on tool wear during hybrid laser additive and milling subtractive manufacturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Directed energy deposition (DED) technology is gaining traction in the biomedical and aviation industries due to its ability to deposit a variety of materials, create complex structures, and achieve high processing efficiency. 316L stainless steel, known for its exceptional oxidation resistance, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance, finds extensive applications in the nuclear power sector. However, there is a dearth of literature on tool wear when machining additively manufactured alloys, especially under dry and thermal cutting conditions. These conditions are particularly relevant for hybrid additive and subtractive manufacturing (HASM), which aims to reduce clamping steps and energy consumption. Thermal milling appears to be an effective solution for streamlining the processing complexity and enhancing the bonding strength of the HASM interface. This paper aims to reduce energy consumption associated with the complex and time-consuming multi-machine tool machining process. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate the mechanisms of tool wear during the milling of DED 316L stainless steel under dry and thermal conditions using a TiAlN-coated tool at various cutting speeds. The study investigates the effects of milling temperature, number of cutting edges, and milling speed on tool wear, surface roughness, and surface residual stress. Analysis techniques such as 3D optical profilometry are employed to assess abrasive and adhesive wear. The results obtained demonstrate that cooling-free HASM can reduce clamping time and energy consumption. Quadruple-edged tools operating at 3000 r/min exhibit superior milling performance compared to double-edged tools at 2000 r/min. Furthermore, the entire tool wear process is analyzed using parameters such as Ra, Sa, and surface morphology. Examining the impact of high-temperature workpiece milling parameters on tool wear provides valuable insights for producing additive manufacturing parts with superior performance and surface quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Oliveira JP, Santos TG, Miranda RM (2020) Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: from theory to practice. Prog Mater Sci 107:100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu M, Duan C, Li G et al (2023) Friction property and milling machinability of Ni60 cladding layer in hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 93:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu L, Xue P, Lan Q et al (2021) Recent research and development status of laser cladding: a review. Opt Laser Technol 138:106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.106915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ni C, Zhu L, Zheng Z et al (2020) Effect of material anisotropy on ultra-precision machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd 848:156457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saboori A, Piscopo G, Lai M et al (2020) An investigation on the effect of deposition pattern on the microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stress of 316L produced by directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A 780:139179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton AT, Kriewall CS, Leu MC et al (2020) Characterization of laser spatter and condensate generated during the selective laser melting of 304L stainless steel powder. Addit Manuf 31:100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao D (2023) Strength Enhancement by Polylactic acid (PLA) Matrix modification of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites by material extrusion process. Process 7:1–11

  8. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN et al (2022) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy 25:71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li N, Huang S, Zhang G et al (2019) Progress in additive manufacturing on new materials: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 35:242–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson Y, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Kukla C, Felfer P (2019) Fused filament fabrication, debinding and sintering as a low cost additive manufacturing method of 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf 30:100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian C, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang Z (2019) A cloud service platform integrating additive and subtractive manufacturing with high resource efficiency. J Clean Prod 241:118379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khanna N, Agrawal C, Dogra M, Pruncu CI (2020) Evaluation of tool wear, energy consumption, and surface roughness during turning of Inconel 718 using sustainable machining technique. J Mater Res Technol 9:5794–5804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khaliq W, Zhang C, Jamil M, Khan AM (2020) Tool wear, surface quality, and residual stresses analysis of micro-machined additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V under dry and MQL conditions. Tribol Int 151:106408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh GR, Gupta MK, Mia M, Sharma VS (2018) Modeling and optimization of tool wear in MQL-assisted milling of Inconel 718 superalloy using evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1911-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. An Q, Cai C, Zou F et al (2020) Tool wear and machined surface characteristics in side milling Ti6Al4V under dry and supercritical CO2 with MQL conditions. Tribol Int 151:106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2014) Hard turning using HiPIMS-coated carbide tools: wear behavior under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Meas J Int Meas Confed 55:536–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yıldırım ÇV (2019) Experimental comparison of the performance of nanofluids, cryogenic and hybrid cooling in turning of Inconel 625. Tribol Int 137:366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bordin A, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A, Bariani PF (2015) Analysis of tool wear in cryogenic machining of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Wear 328–329:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruschi S, Bertolini R, Bordin A et al (2016) Influence of the machining parameters and cooling strategies on the wear behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti6Al4V for biomedical applications. Tribol Int 102:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sartori S, Moro L, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2017) On the tool wear mechanisms in dry and cryogenic turning additive manufactured titanium alloys. Tribol Int 105:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.09.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bordin A, Sartori S, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A (2017) Experimental investigation on the feasibility of dry and cryogenic machining as sustainable strategies when turning Ti6Al4V produced by additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 142:4142–4151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meng W, Xiaohui Y, Zhang W et al (2020) Additive manufacturing of a functionally graded material from Inconel625 to Ti6Al4V by laser synchronous preheating. J Mater Process Technol 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116368

  23. Kishore V, Ajinjeru C, Nycz A et al (2017) Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit Manuf 14:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li P, Liu J, Zhou J et al (2022) In-situ and off-line deformations of cylindrical walls manufactured by directed energy deposition with different dwell times. Measurement 198:111402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li P, Liu J, Liu B et al (2022) Microstructure and mechanical properties of in-situ synthesized Ti ( N , C ) strengthen IN718 / 1040 steel laminate by directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A 846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143247

  26. Li P, Zhou J, Li L et al (2021) Influence of depositing sequence and materials on interfacial characteristics and mechanical properties of laminated composites. Mater Sci Eng A 827:142092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yıldırım ÇV, Sarıkaya M, Kıvak T, Şirin Ş (2019) The effect of addition of hBN nanoparticles to nanofluid-MQL on tool wear patterns, tool life, roughness and temperature in turning of Ni-based Inconel 625. Tribol Int 134:443–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu D, Zhang X, Ding H (2013) Tool wear characteristics in machining of nickel-based superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu X, Li L, He N et al (2019) Laser induced oxidation of cemented carbide during micro milling. Ceram Int 45:15156–15163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li B (2012) A review of tool wear estimation using theoretical analysis and numerical simulation technologies. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 35:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wanigarathne PC, Kardekar AD, Dillon OW et al (2005) Progressive tool-wear in machining with coated grooved tools and its correlation with cutting temperature. Wear 259:1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goel S, Luo X, Reuben RL, Pen H (2012) Influence of temperature and crystal orientation on tool wear during single point diamond turning of silicon. Wear 284–285:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Choudhury SK, Bartarya G (2003) Role of temperature and surface finish in predicting tool wear using neural network and design of experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:747–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00166-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li K, Zhu K, Mei T (2016) A generic instantaneous undeformed chip thickness model for the cutting force modeling in micromilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 105:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wojciechowski S, Matuszak M, Powałka B et al (2019) Prediction of cutting forces during micro end milling considering chip thickness accumulation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103466

  36. Dib MHM, Duduch JG, Jasinevicius RG (2018) Minimum chip thickness determination by means of cutting force signal in micro endmilling. Precis Eng 51:244–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2016) Influence of cutting fluid conditions and cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear in turning process using Taguchi method. Meas J Int Meas Confed 78:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lizzul L, Sorgato M, Bertolini R et al (2020) Influence of additive manufacturing-induced anisotropy on tool wear in end milling of Ti6Al4V. Tribol Int 146:106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kong D, Chen Y, Li N et al (2019) Relevance vector machine for tool wear prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 127:573–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dang J, Zhang H, Ming W et al (2020) New observations on wear characteristics of solid Al2O3/Si3N4 ceramic tool in high speed milling of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Ceram Int 46:5876–5886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX04001001), the Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20210758), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (No. 2022M710060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liangliang Li, Pengfei Li or Zhifeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Pan, X., Liu, B. et al. Study on tool wear during hybrid laser additive and milling subtractive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129, 1289–1300 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12364-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12364-3

Keywords

Navigation