Skip to main content
Log in

Material recognition method to enable adaptive drilling of multi-material aerospace stacks

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-material stacks comprising composite and metallic layers are widely used in aerospace components. For the assembly of structural part, high-quality holes are required to ensure the performance of the mechanical fastening (rivet/bolt). On the final assembly lines of aircraft structures, these machining operations are often performed using an electric automated drilling unit (eADU). When drilling hybrid stacks, the difference in machinability of the materials (CFRP, titanium alloy, and aluminum alloy) makes it difficult to avoid delamination, fibre pullout, matrix degradation, burrs, roughness, and size defects. Therefore, each material must be drilled with suitable machining conditions to meet the demanding quality requirements. To this end, automated material detection would allow for the adjustment of appropriate cutting parameters for each material. Due to the numerous stack configurations (material, thickness) and the variability of process parameters (tool geometry, cutting conditions, lubrication, etc.), automated material detection is not an easy task. To address this issue in eADU applications, this paper presents a novel approach to identify during the process the drilled material being manufactured using a random forest (RF) machine learning model and multi-sensor data fusion. Cutting forces, vibration, micro-lubrication conditions (flow rate and pressure), and eADU spindle and feed motor currents are monitored on a dedicated drilling test rig. Numerous tests were performed on Al7175/CFRP stacks with different cutting conditions to validate the proposed methodology. Advanced signal processing and analysis in the time and frequency domains are used for feature extraction to identify Al7175 from the CFRP. The input features of the RF model were selected using the feature importance measure embedded in the RF model learning process. The knowledge process of drilling multiple material stacks is also considered. The results showed that the features extracted from the frequency domain are more effective in identifying the CFRP Al7175 than those extracted from the time domain. This optimal subset was then used to build the RF model. The proposed methodology resulted in a highly accurate classification allowing the implementation of an adaptive machining process on the eADU for hybrid stack drilling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu J, Mkaddem A, El Mansori M (2016) Recent advances in drilling hybrid FRP/Ti composite: a state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct 135:316–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. König W, Graß P (1989) Quality definition and assessment in drilling of fibre reinforced thermosets. CIRP Annals 38(1):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62665-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shyha IS, Aspinwall DK, Soo SL, Bradley S (2009) Drill geometry and operating effects when cutting small diameter holes in CFRP. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(12–13):1008–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shyha IS, Aspinwall DK, Soo SL, Bradley S, Perry R, Harden P, Dawson S (2011) Hole quality assessment following drilling of metallic-composite stacks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 1(7–8):569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zitoune R, Krishnaraj V, Collombet F (2010) Study of drilling of composite material and aluminium stack. Compos Struct 92(5):1246–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramulu M, Branson T, Kim D (2001) A study on the drilling of composite and titanium stacks. Compos Struct 54(1):67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharif JS, Rahim EA (2007) Performance of coated- and uncoated-carbide tools when drilling titanium alloy—Ti–6Al4V. J. Mater. Process Technol 185(1–3):72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dornfeld DA, Kim JS, Dechow H, Hewson J, Chen LJ (1999) Drilling burr formation in titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-4V. CIRP Annals 48(1):73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63134-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jallageas J, Ayfre M, Cherif M, K’nevez JY, Cahuc O (2016) Self-adjusting cutting parameter technique for drilling multi-stacked material. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 9(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pardo A, Heinemann R, Nobre NM, Bagshaw L (2021) Assessment of decision-making algorithms for adaptive drilling of aerospace stacks. Procedia CIRP 99:392–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanikumar K, Mata FJ, Paulo Davim J (2008) Analysis of surface roughness parameters in turning of FRP tubes by PCD tool. J Mater Process Technol 204:469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonnet C, Poulachon G, Rech J, Girard Y, Costes P (2015) CFRP drilling: fundamental study of local feed force and consequences on hole exit damage. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 94:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Sypt P, Chérif M, Bois C (2017) CFRP drilling: Fundamental study of local feed force and consequences on hole exit damage. Int J of Fatigue 103:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadafiya K, Bandhu D, Kumari S, Chatterjee S, Abhishek K (2021) Recent trends in drilling of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs): a state-of-the-art review. J Manuf Processes 69:47–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu J, Yin Y, Davim JP, Li L, Ji M, Geier N, Chen M (2022) A critical review addressing the drilling-induced damage issues for CFRP composites. Compos Struct 294:115594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao W, Huang J, Wang B, Ji H (2022) A systematic review of artificial intelligence in the detection of cutting tool breakage in machining operations. Measurement 190:110748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun H, Zhang J, Mo R, Zhang X (2020) In-process tool condition forecasting based on a deep learning method. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 64:101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caggiano A, Napolitano F, Nele L, Teti R (2018) Multiple sensor monitoring for tool wear forecast in drilling of CFRP/CFRP stacks with traditional and innovative drill bits. Procedia CIRP 67:404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teti R, Segreto T, Caggiano A, Nele L (2020) Smart multi-sensor monitoring in drilling of CFRP/CFRP composite material stacks for aerospace assembly applications. Appl Sci 10(3):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soualhi M, Nguyen KTP, Medjaher K (2020) Pattern recognition method of fault diagnostics based on a new health indicator for smart manufacturing. Mech Syst Signal Process 142:106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreiro S, Sierra B, Irigoien I, Gorritxategi E (2011) Data mining for quality control: burr detection in the drilling process. Comp Ind Eng 60(4):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karnik SR, Gaitonde VN, Rubio JC, Correia AE, Abrão AM, Davim JP (2008) Delamination analysis in high speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) using artificial neural network model. Mater Design 29(9):1768–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hrechuk A (2023) Recognition of drilling-induced defects in fiber reinforced polymers using machine learning. Procedia CIRP 117:384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Domínguez-Monferrer C, Fernández-Pérez J, De Santos R, Miguélez MH, Cantero JL (2022) Machine learning approach in non-intrusive monitoring of tool wear evolution in massive CFRP automatic drilling processes in the aircraft industry. J Manuf Syst 65:622–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teti R, Mourtzis D, D'Addona DM, Caggiano A (2022) Process monitoring of machining. CIRP Annals - Manuf Techn 71:529–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang HY, Wang JS, Wang G (2022) A survey of fuzzy clustering validity evaluation methods. Info Sci 618:270–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Neugebauer R, Ben-Hanan U, Ihlenfeldt S, Wabner M, Stoll A (2012) Acoustic emission as a tool for identifying drill position in fiber-reinforced plastic and aluminum stacks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abellan-Nebot JV, Romero SF (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:237–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2191-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teti R, Jemielniak K, Donnell GO, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann 59(2):717–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duo A, Segreto T, Caggiano A, Basagoiti R, Teti R, Arrazola PJ (2021) Drilling process monitoring: a framework for data gathering and feature extraction techniques. Procedia CIRP 99:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Araujo AC, Landon Y, Lagarrigue P (2021) Smart drilling for aerospace industry: state of art in research and education. Procedia CIRP 99:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thawonmas R, Abe S (1997) A novel approach to feature selection based on analysis of class regions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 27(2):196–207 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/558798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandrashekar G, Sahin F (2014) A survey on feature selection methods. Comp & Electrical Eng 40(1):16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Quian Y, Pattipati K, Utsav AU, Bollas G (2022) Hybrid fata-driven and model_informed online tool wear detection in milling machines. J manuf syst 63:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hegde C, Daigle H, Gray KE (2019) Classification of drilling stick slip severity using machine learning. J Pet Sci Eng 179:1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall (Wadsworth, Inc.), New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Turki Y, Habak M, Velasco R, Aboura Z, Khellil K, Vantomme P (2014) Experimental investigation of drilling damage and stitching effects on the mechanical behavior of carbon/epoxy composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 87:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pardoa A, Majeed M, Heinemann R (2020) Process signals characterisation to enable adaptive drilling of aerospace stacks. Procedia CIRP 88:479–484. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the company SETI-TEC by providing technical support and funding (CIFRE). This work also received financial support from the National Research Agency (ANR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were conducted by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Abdoulaye Affadine Haoua, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Cherif.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haoua, A.A., Rey, PA., Cherif, M. et al. Material recognition method to enable adaptive drilling of multi-material aerospace stacks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 131, 779–796 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12046-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12046-0

Keywords

Navigation