Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Precisely tuning the residual stress anisotropy in machine hammer peening

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machine hammer peening (MHP) is a novel surface modification process that can strengthen and smoothen the treated parts in one process, significantly improving their fatigue performance. The strengthening effect is mainly due to the induced highly controllable residual compressive stress on the subsurface. However, the residual compressive stress induced by MHP is usually anisotropic, with the component perpendicular to the feed direction more significant than parallel. The anisotropic residual stress will have an adverse effect if the treated parts are subjected to multiaxial loads, which puts forward high demands to precisely tune such anisotropy. For this purpose, a finite element model with a velocity-based driving mode is first established in this paper, which can simulate the residual stress induced by MHP. The origin of the anisotropy is then revealed by analyzing the evolution of the simulated residual stress. Based on this, methods to precisely tune the residual stress anisotropy are proposed. The residual stress anisotropy can be precisely tuned by optimizing MHP parameters, including the overlap ratio, impact velocity, and MHP path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones R (2014) Fatigue crack growth and damage tolerance. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 37:463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maiti SK (2015) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. John M, Kalvala PR, Misra M, Menezes PL (2021) Peening techniques for surface modification: processes, properties, and applications. Materials 14:3841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner L, Mhaede M, Wollmann M, Altenberger I, Sano Y (2011) Surface layer properties and fatigue behavior in Al 7075–T73 and Ti-6Al-4V: Comparing results after laser peening; shot peening and ball-burnishing. Int J Struct Integr 2:185. https://doi.org/10.1108/17579861111135923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Almangour B, Yang J-M (2016) Improving the surface quality and mechanical properties by shot-peening of 17–4 stainless steel fabricated by additive manufacturing. Mater Des 110:914–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almangour B, Yang J-M (2017) Integration of heat treatment with shot peening of 17–4 stainless steel fabricated by direct metal laser sintering. JOM 69:2309–2313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amanov A, Karimbaev R, Maleki E, Unal O, Pyun Y-S, Amanov T (2019) Effect of combined shot peening and ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification processes on the fatigue performance of AISI 304. Surf Coat Technol 358:695–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Efe Y, Karademir I, Husem F, Maleki E, Karimbaev R, Amanov A, Unal O (2020) Enhancement in microstructural and mechanical performance of AA7075 aluminum alloy via severe shot peening and ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification. Applied Surface Science 528:146922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang M, Wang C, Tao X, Zhou Y (2022) Numerical study on laser shock peening of pure Al correlating with laser shock wave. Materials 15:7051-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207051

  10. Zhou Y, Chu X, Zang S, Sun J, Yang L, Gao J (2022) Effect of surface integrity on fatigue life of 7075–T6 aluminum alloy by combination of fine turning with hydrostatic deep rolling. Arch Civ Mech Eng 23:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00580-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Wang X, Tian Y, Ling Y (2023) Study on surface residual stress of 42CrMo steel treated by ultrasonic rolling extrusion. Sci Rep 13:6956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34203-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moon JH, Baek SM, Lee SG, Seong Y, Amanov A, Lee S, Kim HS (2019) Effects of residual stress on the mechanical properties of copper processed using ultrasonic-nanocrystalline surface modification. Mater Res Lett 7:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2018.1560370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu S, Hu Y, Zhang X, Zou Y, Ahmad T, Zhang W, Tang F, Liang T (2020) Experimental investigation on ultrasonic shot peening of WC-Co alloy. Mater Manuf Process 35:1576–1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1779943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang C, Dong Y, Ye C (2021) Recent developments and novel applications of laser shock peening: a review. Adv Eng Mater 23:2001216. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202001216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu Y, Gao H, Wang X, Guo D (2017) Machining the integral impeller and blisk of aero-engines: a review of surface finishing and strengthening technologies. Chin J Mech Eng 30:528–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0123-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozdana AT, Gindy NNZ (2008) Comparative experimental study on effects of conventional and ultrasonic deep cold rolling processes on Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Technol 24:1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328408X302431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Wang LJ, Wang DP (2011) Study on ultrasonic surface rolling process using FEM analysis. Adv Mat Res 189–193:2112–2115. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.189-193.2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan WL, Cheng HKF (2022) Hammer peening technology—the past, present, and future. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 118:683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07993-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Withers PJ (2007) Residual stress and its role in failure. Rep Prog Phys 70:2211–2264. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/r04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Acevedo C (2011) Influence of residual stresses on fatigue response of welded tubular K-joints. Dissertation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-5056

  21. Rossmann A (2015) Aircraft turbine engine safety volume 4B: problem oriented technology for professionals. Axel Rossmann Turboconsult, Karlsfeld

  22. Bleicher F, Lechner C, Habersohn C, Kozeschnik E, Adjassoho B, Kaminski H (2012) Mechanism of surface modification using machine hammer peening technology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gui Y (2020) Surface modification of TC4 titanium alloy by micro-forging technology. Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. https://doi.org/10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2020.001634

  24. Klumpp A, Tamam M, Lienert F, Dietrich S, Gibmeier J, Schulze V (2017) Residual stress states after piezo peening treatment at cryogenic and elevated temperatures predicted by FEM using suitable material models. Mater Res Proc 2:526–533. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781945291173-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Selegård L, Peng RL, Billenius A, Petersén G, Ess M, Jonsson M (2017) Residual stresses in dengeling-treated aluminum alloy AA 7050. Mater Res Proc 2:425–430. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781945291173-72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trauth D (2016) Tribology of machine hammer peened tool surfaces for deep drawing. Apprimus Wissenschaftsverlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  27. Correa C, Peral D, Porro JA, Díaz M, Ruiz De Lara L, García-Beltrán A, Ocaña JL (2015) Random-type scanning patterns in laser shock peening without absorbing coating in 2024–T351 Al alloy: a solution to reduce residual stress anisotropy. Opt Laser Technol 73:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim A, Castagne S, Cher Wong C (2016) Effect of deep cold rolling on residual stress distributions between the treated and untreated regions on Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:111005–111012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu X, Liu P, Zhang C, Liang H, Hua J (2023) Study on surface integrity and fatigue properties of TC4 titanium alloy by surface ultrasonic rolling. Materials 16:485–499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li K, Wang C, Hu X, Zhou Y, Lai Y, Wang C (2022) DEM-FEM coupling simulation of residual stresses and surface roughness induced by shot peening of TC4 titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 118:1469–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07905-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gkatzogiannis S, Knoedel P, Ummenhofer T (2019) FE simulation of high frequency mechanical impact (HFMI) treatment – first results. Ce/papers 3:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gkatzogiannis S (2021) Finite element simulation of residual stresses from welding and high frequency hammer peening. Dissertation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000125591

  33. Altschuler Y, Kaatz T, Cina B (1988) Relief of residual stresses in a high-strength aluminum alloy by cold working. In: Mordfin L (ed) Mechanical relaxation of residual stresses, 1st edn. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, pp 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP26357S

  34. Morrow J, Ross AS, Sinclair GM (1960) Relaxation of residual stresses due to fatigue loading. SAE trans 68:40–48. https://doi.org/10.4271/600008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu J, Yue Z, Geng X, Wen S, Yan W (2018) Long-life design and test technology of typical aircraft structures. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the“Deep-sea Project” Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the National Engineering and Research Center for Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing.

Funding

The study was supported by the “Deep-sea Project” Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SL2021MS010) and the National Engineering and Research Center for Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing (COMAC-SFGS-2022–2056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Qi Liu, Siyu Jin & Bin Shen

  2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Qi Liu, Siyu Jin & Bin Shen

Authors
  1. Qi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siyu Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Qi Liu performed the FE simulation setup and the analysis of residual stress anisotropy and wrote the first draft of this paper. Siyu Jin carried out the experimental verification. Bin Shen completed the introduction and revised the first draft of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The authors declare their consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The authors declare their consent for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Jin, S. & Shen, B. Precisely tuning the residual stress anisotropy in machine hammer peening. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 4577–4589 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11828-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11828-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation