Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing 3D printing facility selection for ubiquitous manufacturing using an evolving fuzzy big data analytics approach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been considered a sustainable and competitive tool for manufacturing products and their components in numerous industries. However, since there are more and more available 3D printing facilities providing unequal services, choosing a suitable 3D printing facility remains a challenging task to manufacturers. In addition, a decision maker also needs to make negotiation between selection criteria that may be conflicting and dependent. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes an evolving fuzzy big data analytics approach. In the proposed methodology, the modified evolving fuzzy assessment (MEFA) method is devised to improve the accuracy of deriving the fuzzy priorities of criteria efficiently. Subsequently, to remove the dependency between criteria, PCA is applied. Finally, the dependency-removed fuzzy technique for order preference via similarity to ideal solutions (FTOPSIS) (Dr-FTOPSIS) is proposed to assess and compare the 3D printing facilities under consideration. The evolving fuzzy big data analytics approach has been applied to a real case of choosing suitable 3D printing facilities in a prosthetic limb supply chain. The experimental results supported the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in improving the derivation process and making a more reasonable choice of suitable 3D printing facilities. The MEFA approach increased the efficiency of deriving fuzzy priorities by 80%. In addition, the overall performance of the best 3D printing facility recommended by the proposed methodology was about 7% better than those recommended by the existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang YC, Chen T, Yeh YL (2019) Advanced 3D printing technologies for the aircraft industry: A fuzzy systematic approach for assessing the critical factors. Int J Adv Manufac Technol 105:4059–4069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung KC, Shu MH, Wang YC, Huang JC, Lau EM (2020) 3D printing technologies applied to the manufacturing of aircraft components. Modern Physics Letters B 34(07n09):2040018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EOS (2023) Additive manufacturing for aviation locking shaft for the aircraft door of an Airbus A350. https://www.eos.info/en/all-3d-printing-applications/aerospace-3d-printing/aircraft

  4. Chen TCT (2022) Defect pattern analysis, yield learning modeling, and yield prediction. Production Planning and Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing: Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0 Applications. p. 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein S, Avery M, Adams G, Pollard S, Simske S (2014) From scan to print: 3D printing as a means for replication. NIP Digital Fabrication Conference 1:417–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen TCT, Lin YC (2019) A three-dimensional-printing-based agile and ubiquitous additive manufacturing system. Robotics Comput Integrated Manufac 55:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Chakrabarty A (2017) Ubiquitous manufacturing: Overview, framework and further research directions. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(4–5):381–394

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiu MC, Chen TCT (2022) A ubiquitous healthcare system of 3D printing facilities for making dentures: Application of type-II fuzzy logic. Digital Health 8:20552076221092540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, TCT (2020) Capacity planning for a ubiquitous manufacturing system based on three-dimensional printing. 3D Printing and ubiquitous manufacturing, p 47–62

  10. Rogers H, Baricz N, Pawar KS (2016) 3D printing services: classification, supply chain implications and research agenda. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 46(10):886–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, TCT (2020) Application of ubiquitous manufacturing to a conventional manufacturer. 3D Printing and Ubiquitous Manufacturing, p 13–27

  12. Wang YC, Chen TCT (2022) Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 vaccination requirements on travelers’ selection of hotels using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Healthcare Analytics 2:100064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberson DA, Espalin D, Wicker RB (2013) 3D printer selection: A decision-making evaluation and ranking model. Virtual Phys Prototyp 8(3):201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen T-CT (2018) Guest editorial. Rapid Prototyp J 24(3):509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Santana L, Alves JL, Netto ADCS (2017) A study of parametric calibration for low cost 3D printing: Seeking improvement in dimensional quality. Mater Des 135:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen T, Lin CW (2020) Smart and automation technologies for ensuring the long-term operation of a factory amid the COVID-19 pandemic: An evolving fuzzy assessment approach. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 111:3545–3558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2007) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Prabhu SR, Ilangkumaran M (2019) Decision making methodology for the selection of 3D printer under fuzzy environment. Int J Mater Prod Technol 59(3):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prabhu SR, Ilangkumaran M (2019) Selection of 3D printer based on FAHP integrated with GRA-TOPSIS. Int J Mater Prod Technol 58(2/3):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen T, Wu HC (2021) Fuzzy collaborative intelligence fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for selecting suitable three-dimensional printers. Soft Comput 25:4121–4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen TCT (2022) Type-II fuzzy collaborative intelligence for assessing cloud manufacturing technology applications. Robotics Comput Integrated Manufact 78:102399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen T, Wang YC, Wu HC (2021) Analyzing the impact of vaccine availability on alternative supplier selection amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A cFGM-FTOPSIS-FWI approach. Healthcare 9(1):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu H-C, Lin Y-C, Chen T (2022) Leisure agricultural park selection for traveler groups amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Agriculture 12(1):111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, TCT (2021) Deriving the priorities of criteria. Advances in Fuzzy Group Decision Making, p 29–54.

  25. Chen T, Lin YC, Chiu MC (2019) Approximating alpha-cut operations approach for effective and efficient fuzzy analytic hierarchy process analysis. Appl Soft Comput 85:105855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Broekhoven E, De Baets B (2006) Fast and accurate center of gravity defuzzification of fuzzy system outputs defined on trapezoidal fuzzy partitions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(7):904–918

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Golz M, Wysk R, King R, Nolan-Cherry C, Bryant S (2018) A supply chain model of hip stem prostheses produced using 3D printing: A comprehensive description of the simulation model. Winter Simulation Conference, p 3072–3083

  28. Chen T, Wang YC (2019) An advanced IoT system for assisting ubiquitous manufacturing with 3D printing. Int J Adv Manufac Technol 103:1721–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Attaran M (2020) 3D printing role in filling the critical gap in the medical supply chain during COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Ind Bus Manag 10(05):988

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mavri M (2015) Redesigning a production chain based on 3D printing technology. Knowl Process Manag 22(3):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu HC, Chen TCT (2018) Quality control issues in 3D-printing manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 24(3):607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen TCT (2020) Evaluating the sustainability of a smart technology application to mobile health care: the FGM–ACO–FWA approach. Complex Intelligent Syst 6(1):109–121

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng G, Zhu N, Tian Z, Chen Y, Sun B (2012) Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Saf Sci 50(2):228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Linares-Mustarós S, Ferrer-Comalat JC, Corominas-Coll D, Merigó JM (2019) The ordered weighted average in the theory of expertons. Int J Intell Syst 34(3):345–365

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Opricovic S (2011) Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12983–12990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manners-Bell J, Lyon K (2012) The implications of 3D printing for the global logistics industry. Transport Intell 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen T, Lin Y-C (2020) A FAHP-FTOPSIS approach for bioprinter selection. Heal Technol 10:1455–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin C-W, Chen T (2019) 3D printing technologies for enhancing the sustainability of an aircraft manufacturing or MRO company – a multi-expert partial-consensus FAHP analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:4171–4180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shuaib M, Haleem A, Kumar S, Javaid M (2021) Impact of 3D Printing on the environment: A literature-based study. Sustain Oper Comput 2:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang YJ, Liu LJ, Han TC (2022) Interval-valued fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making with dependent evaluation criteria for evaluating service performance of international container ports. J Marine Sci Eng 10(7):991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dağdeviren M (2010) A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems. J Intell Manuf 21:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen TCT (2021) Introduction to fuzzy group decision-making. Advances in Fuzzy Group Decision Making. pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  43. Öztürk ZK (2006) A review of multi criteria decision making with dependency between criteria. Multi-Criteria Decis Mak 5:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wu HC, Chen TCT, Chiu MC (2021) Constructing a precise fuzzy feedforward neural network using an independent fuzzification approach. Axioms 10(4):282

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not available.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Wei Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not required.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Guarantor

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, TC.T., Lin, CW. & Chiu, MC. Optimizing 3D printing facility selection for ubiquitous manufacturing using an evolving fuzzy big data analytics approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 4111–4121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11799-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11799-y

Keywords

Navigation