Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing has been pointed as the answer to reduce manufacturing time and cost for aeronautic parts with a high buy to fly ratio. The manufacturability of a part by additive manufacturing depends on important indicators that would allow it to be cost effective. One key indicator is the manufacturing time, which is highly dependent on an important factor: the interlayer time. The interlayer time is the time needed by the material to cool down to a chosen temperature, called interlayer temperature, that allows a new deposition of molten material. The interlayer temperature is defined by using time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams, the final goal being to avoid the appearance of detrimental phases that could lead to a decrease in the material’s mechanical properties. The interlayer temperature is intimately correlated with the cooling curve. The difficulty of predicting the cooling time is due to the influence of the part geometry, the deposition strategy, and the dimensions of the substrate. Their correlation needs to be understood in order to minimize the travel time (ttravel) while ensuring an acceptable material quality. This paper presents a methodology to estimate manufacturing time that combines kinematic and thermal criteria for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process. Application is performed for stainless steel 316L. In this first step toward an advanced manufacturing time estimator, only the first layer attached to the building plate is analyzed from a thermal point of view. The thermal analysis is based on an analytical model enabling the evaluation of the preheating temperature (PhT) in a first approach and providing an adequate framework for the evaluation of cooling curves in a second time. The model includes an accurate description of robot kinematics through the consideration of a realistic travel speed variation along the toolpath. It is used to evaluate an indicator that quantifies the thermal influence of a given deposition strategy. The results show the dependency relationship between manufacturing strategy and inherent thermal gradient and its implications on part production time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
The code generated for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Cunningham CR, Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2018) Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 22:672–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020
Wu B et al (2018) A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. J Manuf Process 35:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001
Ayarkwa KF, Pinter Z, Eimer E, Williams S, Ding J, Suder W (2021) Effect of the deposition strategy on Al-Cu alloy wire + arc additive manufacture. SVR - Materials Science and Engineering Technology 1(1):28–34
Michel F, Lockett H, Ding J, Martina F, Marinelli G, Williams S (2019) A modular path planning solution for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 60:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.009
Jin W, Zhang C, Jin S, Tian Y, Wellmann D, Liu W (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing of stainless steels: a review. Appl Sci 10(5):1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051563
Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2014) A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5808-5
Viola RDS, Balandraud X, Poulhaon F, Michaud P, Duc E (2022) Complex interaction between cmt equipment and robot controllers during the WAAM process: consequences for toolpath accuracy. In Review, preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1243948/v1
Diourté A (2021) Continuous three-dimensional path planning (CTPP) for complex thin parts with wire arc additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 37:101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101622
Bai X et al (2018) Numerical analysis of heat transfer and fluid flow in multilayer deposition of PAW-based wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 124:504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.085
Geng H, Li J, Xiong J, Lin X (2017) Optimisation of interpass temperature and heat input for wire and arc additive manufacturing 5A06 aluminium alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 22(6):472–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2016.1259031
Mukin D, Valdaytseva E, Turichin G, Vildanov A (2021) An extended analytical solution of the non-stationary heat conduction problem in multi-track thick-walled products during the additive manufacturing process. Materials 14(23):7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237291
Mukin D, Valdaytseva E, Turichin G (2021) Analytical solution of the non-stationary heat conduction problem in thin-walled products during the additive manufacturing process. Materials 14(14):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14144049
Mohebbi MS, Kühl M, Ploshikhin V (2020) A thermo-capillary-gravity model for geometrical analysis of single-bead wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(3–4):877–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05647-6
Li R, Xiong J (2019) Influence of interlayer dwell time on stress field of thin-walled components in WAAM via numerical simulation and experimental tests. RPJ 25(8):1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0067
Ren K, Chew Y, Zhang YF, Fuh JYH, Bi GJ (2020) Thermal field prediction for laser scanning paths in laser aided additive manufacturing by physics-based machine learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 362:112734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112734
Wolfer AJ et al (2019) Fast solution strategy for transient heat conduction for arbitrary scan paths in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 30:100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100898
Li R et al (2021) Effect of path strategy on residual stress and distortion in laser and cold metal transfer hybrid additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 46:102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102203
Nunes AC (1983) An extended rosenthal weld model. AWS, Welding Research Supplement pp 165–170
Ettaieb K, Lavernhe S, Tournier C (2021) A flash-based thermal simulation of scanning paths in LPBF additive manufacturing. RPJ 27(4):720–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2020-0086
Priarone PC, Campatelli G, Montevecchi F, Venturini G, Settineri L (2019) A modelling framework for comparing the environmental and economic performance of WAAM-based integrated manufacturing and machining. CIRP Annals 68(1):37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.005
Lundbäck A (2010) Modelling and simulation of welding and metal deposition. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå
Nguyen NT, Ohta A, Matsuoka K, Suzuki N, Maeda Y (1999) Analytical solutions for transient temperature of semi-infinite body subjected to 3-D moving heat sources. Weld J vol 78
Valencia et al (2008) Thermophysical properties. ASM Handbook, vol 15: Casting, pp 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1361/asmhba0005240
Funding
This work was supported by the French Research Agency through the Indus-Addi project (N° ANR-19-CE10-0001–01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R. Viola Da Silva: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization. F. Poulhaon: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. X. Balandraud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. P. Michaud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Project administration. E. Duc: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Viola, R., Poulhaon, F., Balandraud, X. et al. Manufacturing time estimator based on kinematic and thermal considerations: application to WAAM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 131, 689–699 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11658-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11658-w