Skip to main content
Log in

Manufacturing time estimator based on kinematic and thermal considerations: application to WAAM process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing has been pointed as the answer to reduce manufacturing time and cost for aeronautic parts with a high buy to fly ratio. The manufacturability of a part by additive manufacturing depends on important indicators that would allow it to be cost effective. One key indicator is the manufacturing time, which is highly dependent on an important factor: the interlayer time. The interlayer time is the time needed by the material to cool down to a chosen temperature, called interlayer temperature, that allows a new deposition of molten material. The interlayer temperature is defined by using time–temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams, the final goal being to avoid the appearance of detrimental phases that could lead to a decrease in the material’s mechanical properties. The interlayer temperature is intimately correlated with the cooling curve. The difficulty of predicting the cooling time is due to the influence of the part geometry, the deposition strategy, and the dimensions of the substrate. Their correlation needs to be understood in order to minimize the travel time (ttravel) while ensuring an acceptable material quality. This paper presents a methodology to estimate manufacturing time that combines kinematic and thermal criteria for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process. Application is performed for stainless steel 316L. In this first step toward an advanced manufacturing time estimator, only the first layer attached to the building plate is analyzed from a thermal point of view. The thermal analysis is based on an analytical model enabling the evaluation of the preheating temperature (PhT) in a first approach and providing an adequate framework for the evaluation of cooling curves in a second time. The model includes an accurate description of robot kinematics through the consideration of a realistic travel speed variation along the toolpath. It is used to evaluate an indicator that quantifies the thermal influence of a given deposition strategy. The results show the dependency relationship between manufacturing strategy and inherent thermal gradient and its implications on part production time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code generated for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cunningham CR, Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2018) Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 22:672–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu B et al (2018) A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. J Manuf Process 35:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayarkwa KF, Pinter Z, Eimer E, Williams S, Ding J, Suder W (2021) Effect of the deposition strategy on Al-Cu alloy wire + arc additive manufacture. SVR - Materials Science and Engineering Technology 1(1):28–34

  4. Michel F, Lockett H, Ding J, Martina F, Marinelli G, Williams S (2019) A modular path planning solution for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 60:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin W, Zhang C, Jin S, Tian Y, Wellmann D, Liu W (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing of stainless steels: a review. Appl Sci 10(5):1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2014) A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5808-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viola RDS, Balandraud X, Poulhaon F, Michaud P, Duc E (2022) Complex interaction between cmt equipment and robot controllers during the WAAM process: consequences for toolpath accuracy. In Review, preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1243948/v1

  8. Diourté A (2021) Continuous three-dimensional path planning (CTPP) for complex thin parts with wire arc additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 37:101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101622

  9. Bai X et al (2018) Numerical analysis of heat transfer and fluid flow in multilayer deposition of PAW-based wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 124:504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geng H, Li J, Xiong J, Lin X (2017) Optimisation of interpass temperature and heat input for wire and arc additive manufacturing 5A06 aluminium alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 22(6):472–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2016.1259031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukin D, Valdaytseva E, Turichin G, Vildanov A (2021) An extended analytical solution of the non-stationary heat conduction problem in multi-track thick-walled products during the additive manufacturing process. Materials 14(23):7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237291

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukin D, Valdaytseva E, Turichin G (2021) Analytical solution of the non-stationary heat conduction problem in thin-walled products during the additive manufacturing process. Materials 14(14):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14144049

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohebbi MS, Kühl M, Ploshikhin V (2020) A thermo-capillary-gravity model for geometrical analysis of single-bead wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109(3–4):877–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05647-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li R, Xiong J (2019) Influence of interlayer dwell time on stress field of thin-walled components in WAAM via numerical simulation and experimental tests. RPJ 25(8):1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren K, Chew Y, Zhang YF, Fuh JYH, Bi GJ (2020) Thermal field prediction for laser scanning paths in laser aided additive manufacturing by physics-based machine learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 362:112734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112734

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfer AJ et al (2019) Fast solution strategy for transient heat conduction for arbitrary scan paths in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 30:100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li R et al (2021) Effect of path strategy on residual stress and distortion in laser and cold metal transfer hybrid additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 46:102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nunes AC (1983) An extended rosenthal weld model. AWS, Welding Research Supplement pp 165–170

  19. Ettaieb K, Lavernhe S, Tournier C (2021) A flash-based thermal simulation of scanning paths in LPBF additive manufacturing. RPJ 27(4):720–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2020-0086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Priarone PC, Campatelli G, Montevecchi F, Venturini G, Settineri L (2019) A modelling framework for comparing the environmental and economic performance of WAAM-based integrated manufacturing and machining. CIRP Annals 68(1):37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundbäck A (2010) Modelling and simulation of welding and metal deposition. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen NT, Ohta A, Matsuoka K, Suzuki N, Maeda Y (1999) Analytical solutions for transient temperature of semi-infinite body subjected to 3-D moving heat sources. Weld J vol 78

  23. Valencia et al (2008) Thermophysical properties. ASM Handbook, vol 15: Casting, pp 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1361/asmhba0005240

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the French Research Agency through the Indus-Addi project (N° ANR-19-CE10-0001–01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R. Viola Da Silva: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization. F. Poulhaon: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. X. Balandraud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. P. Michaud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Project administration. E. Duc: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Viola.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viola, R., Poulhaon, F., Balandraud, X. et al. Manufacturing time estimator based on kinematic and thermal considerations: application to WAAM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 131, 689–699 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11658-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11658-w

Keywords

Navigation