Skip to main content
Log in

A calibration method for tool frame in the three-dimensional measurement system based on R-test

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calibration of the tool frame is essential to ensure the accuracy of the measurement system. To enhance the detection range of R-test and make it more suitable for robot calibration, we designed a low-cost and high-precision three-dimensional measurement system with R-test. Then, a two-stage method is proposed to reduce the uncertainty caused by the orthogonalization procedure in the identification of the R-test frame, which consists of an orthogonalization solution that gives an initial value and an intelligent algorithm that improves the identification accuracy. The measurement structure of the R-test and the proposed identification method are easily applicable to articulated arm measuring machines (AMMs). Additionally, we provide an extension method for AMMs. In the experiment, a prototype of the three-dimensional measurement system based on R-test is developed. And, the comparative experiment proves the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Messay T, Ordóñez R, Marcil E (2016) Computationally efficient and robust kinematic calibration methodologies and their application to industrial robots. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 37:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elatta A, Li P, Fan L, Yu D, Luo F (2003) An overview of robot calibration. Inf Technol J 3(1):74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Creaform Inc., VXtrack C-Track Series, Creaform Inc., 4700 Rue de la Pascaline, Lévis QC G6W 0L9, Canada, 2012. www.creaform.com

  4. Hexagon Metrology Inc., Laser Tracker T-Ma, Hexagonmi Inc., 188 Zhuzhou Road Qingdao, China, 2010. www.hexagonmi.com

  5. Apimetrology Inc., Laser Tracker SmartTRACK, Apimetrology Inc., 15000 Johns Hopkins Drive, Rockville, MD20850, United States, 2020. www.apimetrology.com

  6. Nubiola A, Slamani M, Bonev I (2013) A new method for measuring a large set of poses with a single telescoping ballbar. Precis Eng 37(2):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meggiolaro M, Scriffignan G, Dubowsky S (2000) Manipulator calibration using a single endpoint contact constraint, The 26th Biennial Mechanic Robot Conference, 7A:759–767.

  8. Zhu Q, Xie X, Li C, Xia G, Liu Q (2019) Kinematic self-calibration method for dual-manipulators based on optical axis constraint. IEEE Access 7:7768–7782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H, Fuhlbrigge T, Choi S, Wang J, Li X (2008) Practical industrial robot zero offset calibration. IEEE Int. Conf. Automation Sci. Eng. 13:516–521

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Z, Tang X, Chen C, Peng F, Yan R, Zhou L, Li Z, Wu J (2022) High precision and efficiency robotic milling of complex parts: challenges, approaches and trends. Chin J Aeronaut 35(2):22–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du S, Ding J, Liu Y (2015) Industrial robot kinematic calibration using virtual line-based sphere surface constraint approach. IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems 5:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joubair A, Bonev I (2015) Kinematic calibration of a six-axis serial robot using distance and sphere constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(1–4):515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goswami A, Quaid A, Peshkin M (1993) Complete parameter identification of a robot from partial pose information. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 1:168–173

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nubiola A, Bonev I (2014) Absolute robot calibration with a single telescoping ballbar. Precis Eng 38(3):472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dynalog Inc., 3-D COMPUGAUGE Manual (version 4.0), Compugauge: Dynalog Inc., Dynalog, Inc. 6001 1 N. Adams Road, Suite 125, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, United States, 2002.  www.dynalog-us.com

  16. Santolaria J, Conte J, Ginés M (2013) Laser tracker-based kinematic parameter calibration of industrial robots by improved CPA method and active retroreflector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):2087–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma L, Bazzoli P, Sammons P, Landers R, Bristow D (2018) Modeling and calibration of high-order joint-dependent kinematic errors for industrial robots. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 50:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lightcap C, Hamner S, Schmitz T, Banks S (2008) Improved positioning accuracy of the PA10-6CE robot with geometric and flexibility calibration. IEEE Trans Robot 24(2):452–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginani L, Motta J (2011) Theoretical and practical aspects of robot calibration with experimental verification. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 33(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu C, Xi J (2018) Simultaneous and on-line calibration of a robot-based inspecting system. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 49:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beyer L, Wulfsberg J (2004) Practical robot calibration with ROSY. Robotica 22(5):505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiest AG Inc., LaserLAB, Wiest AG Inc., 4 Siemensstrasse, 86356 Neusas, Germany, 2015. www.wiest-ag.com

  23. Guo Y, Song B, Tang X, Zhou X, Jiang Z (2020) A calibration method of non-contact R-test for error measurement of industrial robots. Measurement 108365

  24. Santolaria J, Brau A, Velzquez J, Aguilar J (2010) See fewer A self-centering active probing technique for kinematic parameter identification and verification of articulated arm coordinate measuring machines. Meas Sci Technol 21(5):055101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Santolaria J, Brosed F, Velázquez J, Jiménez R (2013) Self-alignment of on-board measurement sensors for robot kinematic calibration. Precis Eng 37(3):699–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liska J, Vanicek O, Chalus M (2018) Hand-eye calibration of a laser profile scanner in robotic welding. IEEE Int Conf Adv Intell Mechatron 316–321

  27. Wu L, Ren H (2017) Finding the kinematic base frame of a robot by hand-eye calibration using 3D position data. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 14(1):314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu X, Zhu D, Zhang H, Yan S, Ding H (2017) TCP-based calibration in robot-assisted belt grinding of aero-engine blades using scanner measurements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1–4):635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiang Z, Ji D, Zhang H, Wu H, Li Y (2019) A simple PID-based strategy for particle swarm optimization algorithm. Inf Sci 502:558–574

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008) Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:28 ((GUM 1995 with minor corrections))

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52175452), the Stable Support Plan Program of Shenzhen Natural Science Fund (Grant No. 20200925174640002), and Centers for Mechanical Engineering Research and Education at MIT and SUSTech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yixuan Guo contributed to the conception and implementation of the study. Zhouxiang Jiang, Bao Song, Xiaoqi Tang, and Yuanlong Xie contributed to providing the experiment devices and facilities. Chenglong Fu contributed to supervising the study and reviewing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenglong Fu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Jiang, Z., Song, B. et al. A calibration method for tool frame in the three-dimensional measurement system based on R-test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128, 1353–1364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11633-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11633-5

Keywords

Navigation