Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric Analysis of Direct Energy Deposited 316 L-Si powder on 316 L Parts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LMD, an additive manufacturing technique, involves depositing projected powder using a laser beam that can be employed to either fabricate or repair components. Despite its capabilities, process feasibility assessment and choice of process parameters usually requires straightforward single track case studies. Some effects of process parameters such as laser power, powder flow rate or printing rate on printed single-track geometry are indeed critical to ensure the structural and metallurgical quality of the material produced. To identify the optimized process parameters, this study investigates an applicable robust strategy using single tracks to statistically investigate the process parameter effects on geometrical characteristics using a dedicated automated tool (named SAAMO). For different geometrical characteristics of the bead, the optimal process parameters are identified for a 316 L steel, enriched in Silicon. Particular focus is given to dilution analysis while an analytical disc model is used to correctly predict the geometries produced. Based on these findings, it is possible to provide high-quality deposition with needed deposition yield. The metallurgical bond between the produced material and the substrate is therefore optimal for structure build-up/reparation applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Roy T, Abrahams R, Paradowska A et al (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of laser cladded hypereutectoid steel rails. Wear 432–433(202):930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.202930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balit Y, Joly LR, Szmytka F et al (2020) Self-heating behavior during cyclic loadings of 316l stainless steel specimens manufactured or repaired by directed energy deposition. Materials Science and Engineering: A 786(139):476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saboori A, Aversa A, Marchese G et al (2019) Application of directed energy deposition-based additive manufacturing in repair. Applied Sciences 9:3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nam S, Cho H, Kim C et al (2018) Effect of process parameters on deposition properties of functionally graded sts 316/fe manufactured by laser direct metal deposition. Metals 8:607. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8080607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balit Y (2019) Mechanical properties of additively manufactured or repaired single-track thickness structures by directed energy deposition. Master’s thesis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris

  6. El Cheikh H, Courant B, Branchu S et al (2012) Analysis and prediction of single laser tracks geometrical characteristics in coaxial laser cladding process. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 50(3):413–422

  7. de Oliveira U, Ocelík V, Hosson JD (2005) Analysis of coaxial laser cladding processing conditions. Surface & Coatings Technology 197:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ansari M, Razavi R, Barekat M (2016) An empirical-statistical model for coaxial laser cladding of NiCrAlY powder on Inconel 738 superalloy. Optics & Laser Technology 86:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bax B, Rajput R, Kellet R et al (2018) Systematic evaluation of process parameter maps for laser cladding and directed energy deposition. Additive Manufacturing 21:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheikh HE, Courant B, Branchu S et al (2012) Direct Laser Fabrication process with coaxial powder projection of 316L steel. Geometrical characteristics and microstructure characterization of wall structures. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 50:1779–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ocelík V, de Oliveira U, de Boer M et al (2007) Thick Co-based coating on cast iron by side laser cladding: Analysis of processing conditions and coating properties. Surface and Coatings Technology 201:5875–5883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piscopo G, Atzeni E, Biamino S, et al (2022) Analysis of single tracks of in718 produced by laser powder directed energy deposition process. Procedia CIRP

  13. Lin PY, Shen FC, Wu KT et al (2020) Process optimization for directed energy deposition of ss316l components. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 111:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06113-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saboori A, Tusacciu S, Busatto M, et al (2018) Production of single tracks of ti-6al-4v by directed energy deposition to determine the layer thickness for multilayer deposition. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE 133

  15. Ocelík V, Nenadl O, Palavra A et al (2014) On the geometry of coating layers formed by overlap. Surface and Coatings Technology 242:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Y, Khamesee M, Toyserkani E (2018) A new physics-based model for laser directed energy deposition (powder-fed additive manufacturing): From single-track to multi-track and multi-layer. Optics & Laser Technology 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.015

  17. Ruiz J, Cortina M, Arrizubieta J et al (2018) Study of the influence of shielding gases on laser metal deposition of inconel 718 superalloy. Materials 11:1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aga Belsvik M, Tucho W, Hansen V (2020) Microstructural studies of direct-laser-deposited stainless steel 316l-si on 316l base material. SN Applied Sciences 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03530-3

  19. Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM et al (2015) Effects of process time interval and heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructural properties of direct laser deposited 316l stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A 644:171–183

  20. Sreekanth S, Ghassemali E, Hurtig K, et al (2020) Effect of direct energy deposition process parameters on single-track deposits of alloy 718. Metals

  21. Al-Maharma A, Patil S, Markert B (2020) Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: a critical review. Materials Research Express 7(122):001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Romano S, miccoli s, Beretta S, (2019) A new fe post-processor for probabilistic fatigue assessment in the presence of defects and its application to am parts. International Journal of Fatigue 125:324–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.008

  23. Zhao Y, Zhiguo W, Jibin Z et al (2020) Comparison of substrate preheating on mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid specimens fabricated by laser metal deposition 316 l with different wrought steel substrate. Crystals 10:891. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10100891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen W, Spaetig P, Seifert HP (2018) Fatigue behavior of 316l austenitic stainless steel in air and lwr environment with and without mean stress. MATEC Web of Conferences 165(03):012. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816503012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Belsvik MA (2018) Specification of resulting microstructure from additive manufacturing by direct laser deposition of ss316l-si on stainless steel base materials. Master’s thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway

  26. Lister DH, Cook WG (2014) The Essential Candu. Candu nuclear power plant technology, Unene

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong Y, Rännar LE, Liu L et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of 316l stainless steel by electron beam melting for nuclear fusion applications. Journal of Nuclear Materials 486:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McMurtrey MD, O’Brien RC, Sun C, et al (2019) Irradiation damage and iascc of printed 316l for use as fuel cladding. Tech. rep., Idaho National Lab.(INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

  29. ISO (2014) Stainless steels - Chemical composition. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suutala N, Takalo T, Moisio T (1980) Ferritic-austenitic solidification mode in austenitic stainless steel welds. Metall Mater Trans A 11:717–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Özbilen S (1999) Satellite formation mechanism in gas atomised powders. Powder Metallurgy 42:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Riede M, Knoll M, Wilsnack C, et al (2019) Material characterization of aisi 316l flexure pivot bearings fabricated by additive manufacturing. Materials 12

  33. Terrassa KL, Haley JC, MacDonald BE, et al (2018) Reuse of powder feedstock for directed energy deposition. Powder Technology

  34. ASTM (2015) Standard specification for annealed or cold-worked austenitic stainless steel sheet, strip, plate, and flat bar. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lu X, Lin X, Chiumenti M et al (2019) Residual stress and distortion of rectangular and s-shaped ti-6al-4v parts by directed energy deposition: Modelling and experimental calibration. Additive Manufacturing 26:166–179

  36. BeAM (2017) BeAM Mobile Documentation (Confidential). BeAM

  37. Piscopo G, Atzeni E, Saboori A, et al (2022) An overview of the process mechanisms in the laser powder directed energy deposition. Applied Sciences

  38. Li WB, Engström H, Powell J et al (1996) Redistribution of the beam power in laser cladding by powder injection. Lasers in Engineering 5:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lia F, Park J, Tressler J et al (2017) Partitioning of laser energy during directed energy deposition. Additive Manufacturing 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.012

  40. Gedda H, Powell J, Wahlström G et al (2002) Energy redistribution during co2 laser cladding. Journal of Laser Applications 14. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.1471565

  41. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods 9:676–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seabold S, Perktold J (2010) Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference 2010

  43. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950718922

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Costa L, Felde I, Réti T et al (2003) A Simplified Semi-Empirical Method to Select the Processing Parameters for Laser Clad Coatings. Materials Science Forum 414–415:385–393. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.414-415.385

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baris Telmen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

All the authors involved have agreed to participate in this submitted article.

Consent for publication

All the authors involved in this manuscript give full consent for publication of this submitted article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Telmen, B., Szmytka, F., Gloanec, AL. et al. Parametric Analysis of Direct Energy Deposited 316 L-Si powder on 316 L Parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127, 4543–4562 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11409-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11409-x

Keywords

Navigation