Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of bending parameters and automated operation planning for sheet-metal bending orientated to graphical programming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The core of graphical programming for sheet-metal bending is operation planning based on parameter identification, which can directly determine the bending quality and efficiency. Given this, the proposed graphical programming system and method can predict the inner arc radius of bending oriented to programming demands and optimize multi-step bending operations. At first, a neural network model based on multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was established, considering the number of neurons and hidden layers. In the bending process a fitness function was defined, and the discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) was improved using the adaptive inertia weight and the genetic algorithm (GA). Finally, the operation planning of 10-step and 20-step bending was simulated, and bending tests were conducted on sheet-metal workpieces for verification. The results show that the algorithm’s maximum positive error and minimum negative error in predicting the arc radius are 0.12 mm and − 0.16 mm, respectively. When there are 10 bending steps, the particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm (PSO-GA) converges after only ten evolutions; when the bending steps increase to 20, the fitness value finally stabilizes at 1.31. The optimal operations of the experimental six-step bending part are 6 → 5 → 4 → 3 → 1 → 2. This result indicates that the workpiece is turned over three times and turned around once in the sheet-metal bending process, which is consistent with the simulation, thus verifying the bending efficiency and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang TM, Tao Y (2014) Research status and industrialization development strategy of Chinese industrial robot. J Mech Eng 50:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2014.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu FY, Jiang QS, Rong LN, Zhou PF, Hu JL (2019) Structural model and dynamic analysis of six-axis Cartesian coordinate robot for sheet metal bending. Int J Adv Robot Syst 16:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419861568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Y, Yu YF, Wang P, Fang HY, Ma NS (2022) Analysis and mitigation of the bending deformation in girth-welded slender pipes with numerical modeling and experimental measurement. J Manuf Process 78:278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva MF (2013) An industrial robotics course based on a graphical simulation package. 1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), Porto, p 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2013.6701992

  5. Chen CD, Chen CX, Hou QH (2014) Robot human machine interaction system based on graphic programming. Modern Manuf Eng 9:34–38. https://doi.org/10.16731/j.cnki.1671-3133.2014.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedersen MR, Herzog DL, Kruger V (2014) Intuitive skill-level programming of industrial handling tasks on a mobile manipulator. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS), 4523–4530

  7. Zhu JH, You YP, Wang PY (2020) Design of simulation platform for robot sheet metal bending system. J Mech Elect Eng 37:972–976. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4551.2020.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Phanitwong W, Boochakul U, Thipprakmas S (2017) Design of U-Geometry parameters using statistical analysis techniques in the u-bending process. Metals 7:235. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7070235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo ZF, Tang WC (2017) Bending angle prediction model based on BPNN-spline in air bending springback process. Math Probl Eng 7834621. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7834621

  10. Faraz Z, UiHaq SW, Ali L, Mahmood K, Tarar WA, Baqai AA, Khan M, Imran SH (2017) Sheet-metal bend sequence planning subjected to process and material variations. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 88:815–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8823-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin AC, Chen C (2014) Sequence planning and tool selection for bending processes of 2.5D sheet metals. Adv Mech Eng 6:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/204930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salem AA, Abdelmaguid TF, Wifi AS, Elmokadem A (2017) Towards an efficient process planning of the V-bending process: an enhanced automated feature recognition system. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 91:4163–4181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0104-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panghal D, Kashid S, Kumar S, Hussein HMA (2015) An automatic system for deciding bend sequence of bending parts. Adv Mater Process Tech 1:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2015.1116232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prasanth DR, Shunmugam MS (2018) Collision detection during planning for sheet metal bending by bounding volume hierarchy approaches. Int J Comput Integ Manuf 31:893–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1466394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prasanth DR, Shunmugam MS (2020) Geometry-based bend feasibility matrix for bend sequence planning of sheet metal parts. Int J Comput Integ Manuf 33:515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1736718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang YF, Yang B, Wang SL, Liu F, Wang YK, Shu X (2019) A dynamic ant-colony genetic algorithm for cloud service composition optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 102:355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03215-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boga C, Koroglu T (2021) Proper estimation of surface roughness using hybrid intelligence based on artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. J Manuf Process 70:560–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Katoch S, Chauhan SS, Kumar V (2021) A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimed Tools Appl 80:8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang YX, Jiang CY, Qin YH, Ye CL (2020) Robot path planning and experiment with an improved PSO algorithm. Robot 42:71–78. https://doi.org/10.13973/j.cnki.robot.190035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang XW, Yan YX, Gu XS (2019) Spot welding robot path planning using intelligent algorithm. J Manuf Process 42:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kannan TR, Shunmugam MS (2018) Planner for sheet metal components to obtain optimal bend sequence using a genetic algorithm. Int J Comput Integ Manuf 21:790–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920701678833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park HS, Anh TV (2011) Optimization of bending sequence in roll forming using neural network and genetic algorithm. J Mech Sci Tech 25:2127–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0533-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang F, You YP (2012) Genetic algorithm-based sequence planning for V-bending of sheet metal. J South Chin Univ Tech 40:58–63. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-565X.2012.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma YJ, Chen M, Gong Y, Cheng SS, Wang ZY (2020) Research progress of dynamic multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithm. Acta Autom Sin 46:2302–2318. https://doi.org/10.16383/j.aas.c190489

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma XL, Mei H (2021) Mobile robot global path planning based on improved ant colony system algorithm with potential field. J Mech Eng 57:19–27. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2021.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang YX, Wang YQ, Li S, Wang XH (2020) Global path planning for AUV based on charts and the improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Robot 42:120–128. https://doi.org/10.13973/j.cnki.robot.190100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Jia QX, Chen G, Sun HX (2014) Load maximization trajectory optimization for free-floating space robot using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Robot 36(04):402–410. https://doi.org/10.13973/j.cnki.robot.2014.0402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52175100, 52205568), 333 High-level Talents Training Project (2022–3-16–343), and the Natural Science Research Start-up Foundation of Recruiting Talents of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Grant No. NY221123).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. System development, data collection, experiment, and analysis were performed by FX, DD, BF, and SY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FX, and all authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengyu Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, F., Ding, D., Fan, B. et al. Prediction of bending parameters and automated operation planning for sheet-metal bending orientated to graphical programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 126, 2191–2204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11271-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11271-x

Keywords

Navigation