Abstract
Smart industries use modern technologies such as machine learning and big data to maintain supply chain management and increase productivity but still the main challenge faced during quality control as this might affect the production rate. Smart industries are completely based on supervised learning that enables better inspection and effectively controls the parameter involved in the production process. Smart industries choose the mechanism that improves production and assures maximum quality. The various kernel function is initially used to select and extract a parameter. Support vector machine (SVM) is a supervised learning approach used in manufacturing industries to evaluate quality control. The SVM model uses the kernel function, namely RBF, along with Neural Networks, in identifying the parameter involved in quality management and undergoes the classification process. SVM consists of C-SVM and V-SVM classifier models involved in the classification process and undergoes training to handle the multiple numbers of consequence aroused during manufacturing. The performance of SVM classifiers and RBF NNs is evaluated. Different kernel functions, such as polynomial, linear, sigmoid, RBF, and over-varying gamma coefficient values, are tested in the experimental evaluation concerned with the comparative analysis of the continuous quality control function of the SVM classifier. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the SVM classifier in terms of the estimated computational time (88.1%), F1-measure (89.4%), ROC (65%), and accuracy (94.6%). The goal of the proposed model is to monitor the manufacturing process and control fault occurrence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article
References
Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA (2018) Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 117:408–425
Telukdarie A, Buhulaiga E, Bag S, Gupta S, Luo Z (2018) Industry 4.0 Implementation for Multinationals. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 118:316–239
Gifford C (2013) The MOM Chronicles ISA-95 Best Practice Book 3.0. International Society of Automation, Research Triangle Park, NC
Godina R, Matias JCO (2018) “Improvement of the statistical process control through an enhanced test of normality.” In: 2018 7th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM). pp. 17–21, Oxford, UK
Li P, Jiang P (2016) “Research on quality-oriented outsourcing decision architecture for small-batch parts of multistage machining processes.” In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015. pp. 427–433, Atlantis Press, Paris
Ponnan S, Theivadas JR, HemaKumar VS, Einarson D. Driver monitoring and passenger interaction system using wearable device in intelligent vehicle, Computers and Electrical Engineering, 1032022, 108323, ISSN 0045-7906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108323.
Leonid TT, Jayaparvathy R (2022) Classification of elephant sounds using parallel convolutional neural network. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput 32(3):1415–1426
Liu C, Wang H, Fu X, Xie D (2010) “Research on quality control under small batch production condition.” In: 2010 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. pp. 147–150, Changsha, China
Foidl H, Felderer M (2016) Research challenges of Industry 4.0 for quality management. In: Foundations of a Cross-Disciplinary Approach. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32799-0_10
In Lee, Yong Jae Shin “Machine learning for enterprises: applications, algorithm selection, and challenges,” Business Horizons, 63 (2), 157–170, 2020
Ganesh Babu R, Markkandan S, Vinotha V, Priyadarshini S, Kaviya V (2023) IoT Security Using Machine Learning Techniques. In: Maurya S, Peddoju SK, Ahmad B, Chihi I (eds) Cyber Technologies and Emerging Sciences. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 467. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2538-2_37 2016, pp. 149–190,2015.
Carvalho TP, Soares FA, Vita R, Francisco RD, Basto JP (2019) A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 137:106024
Sexton T, Brundage MP, Hoffman M, Morris KC (2017) “Hybrid datafication of maintenance logs from AI-assisted human tags.” In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, USA, 11–14, pp. 1769–1777
Chang CCL, Libsvm CJ (2011) A Library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2:604–611
Ahmad WMTW, Ghani NLA, Drus SM (2019) Data mining techniques for disease risk prediction model: a systematic literature review. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 843:40–46
Parikh UB, Das B, Maheshwari R (2010) Fault classification technique for series compensated transmission line using support vector machine. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 32:629–636
Baghel M, Ghosh A, Singh NK, Singh AK (2016) "Short - term electric load forecasting using SVR implementing LibSVM package and Python code," 2016 IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Electronics Engineering (UPCON), pp. 485-489, 2016, Varanasi, India
Widodo AY, B.S. (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21:2560–2574
Ali OG, Chen Y-T (1999) Design quality and robustness with neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 10(6):1518–1527
Costa N, Ribeiro B (1999) “Artificial neural networks for data modeling of a plastic injection molding process,” in Proc. IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing (ICONIP’99), Perth, Australia, pp. 1081–1087
Wuest T, Weimer D, Irgens C, Thoben K-D (2016) Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod. Manuf. Res. 4(1):23–45
Susto GA, Schirru A, Pampuri S, McLoone S, Beghi A (2015) Machine learning for predictive maintenance: a multiple classifier approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat. 11(3):812–820
Hebert J (2016) “Predicting rare failure events using classification trees on large scale manufacturing data with complex interactions,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data (Big Data), Dec. 2016, pp. 2024–2028, Washington, DC, USA
Wu D, Jennings C, Terpenny J, Gao RX, Kumara S (2017) A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7):071018
Martín Ó, Pereda M, Santos JI, Galán JM (2014) Assessment of resistance spot welding quality based on ultrasonic testing and tree-based techniques. J. Mater. Process. Technol 214(11):2478–2487
Syafrudin M, Alfian G, Fitriyani N, Rhee J (2018) Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing. Sensors 18(9):2946
Chen K, Chen H, Liu L, Chen S (2018) Prediction of weld bead geometry of MAG welding based on XGBoost algorithm. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 101(12):2283–2295
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) “Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, pp. 785–794
Jabbar E, Besse P, Loubes J-M, Roa NB, Merle CC, et al. (2018) ‘‘Supervised learning approach for surface-mount device production,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., Optim., Data Sci. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 254–263
Yuan S, Chu F (2007) Fault diagnostics based on particle swarm optimization and support vector machines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 21:1787–1798
Barelli L, Bidini G, Mariani F, Svanziroli M (2008) A non-conventional quality control system to detect surface faults in mechanical front seals. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 21(7):1065–1072
Choi K, Koo K, Lee J (2006) "Development of defect classification algorithm for POSCO rolling strip surface inspection system,” SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference 2006 Oct. 18-21, in Bexco, Busan, Korea
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Muhammad Shafiq, Dr. Kalpana Thakre, Kalluri Rama Krishna: formed and designed the analysis, carried out the experimental tests, performed the analysis, and wrote the paper. Noel Jeygar Robert, Dr. Ashok Kuruppath, Dr. Devendra Kumar: carried out the experimental tests, collected the data, performed the analysis, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that this work has not been published before, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and that its publication has been approved by all coauthors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shafiq, M., Thakre, K., Krishna, K.R. et al. Continuous quality control evaluation during manufacturing using supervised learning algorithm for Industry 4.0. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10847-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10847-x