Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fault feature selection for the identification of compound gear-bearing faults using firefly algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of compound faults in real-time conditions leads to the early failure of components. However, identifying compound faults in a rotor system is more complex because extracting the fault information from the vibration signals is challenging. Hence, it is inevitable to devise a reliable strategy for predicting compound faults in a rotor system to ensure its life. This work proposes a novel feature selection method using the firefly algorithm (FA) to identify compound gear-bearing faults. The statistical features are extracted from the time domain vibration signals. The firefly algorithm is employed to select the features that have the most pertinent information about the faults. The classification potential of the selected features is tested with an optimized feed forward fully connected neural network (FFFCNN) architecture. Further, the performance of the proposed approach is compared with the genetic algorithm, relief-based feature selection techniques and without the feature selection approach. The FA-based feature selection combined with the FFFCNN achieves a prediction accuracy of 94.86% in identifying the compound gear-bearing faults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saravanan N, Siddabattuni VNSK, Ramachandran KI (2010) Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using artificial neural network (ANN), and proximal support vector machine (PSVM). Appl Soft Comput J 10:344–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarek K, Abderrazek D, Khemissi BM et al (2020) Comparative study between cyclostationary analysis, EMD, and CEEMDAN for the vibratory diagnosis of rotating machines in industrial environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:2747–2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05848-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordoloi DJ, Tiwari R (2014) Support vector machine based optimization of multi-fault classification of gears with evolutionary algorithms from time-frequency vibration data. Measurement 55:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zabihi-Hesari A, Ansari-Rad S, Shirazi FA, Ayati M (2019) Fault detection and diagnosis of a 12-cylinder trainset diesel engine based on vibration signature analysis and neural network. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 233:1910–1923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218778313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vamsi Inturi GR, Sabareesh KS, Penumakala PK (2019) Integrated condition monitoring scheme for bearing fault diagnosis of a wind turbine gearbox. JVC/J Vib Control 25:1852–1865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546319841495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal D, Choudhary A, Pabla BS, Dhami SS (2019) Support vector machines based non-contact fault diagnosis system for bearings. J Intell Manuf 31:1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01511-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaabi L, Lemzadmi A, Djebala A et al (2020) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings in non-stationary running conditions using improved CEEMDAN and multivariate denoising based on wavelet and principal component analyses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3859–3873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05311-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouhalais ML, Djebala A, Ouelaa N et al (2018) CEEMDAN and OWMRA as a hybrid method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis under variable speed. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:2475–2489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1044-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Minhas AS, Kankar PK, Kumar N, Singh S (2021) Bearing fault detection and recognition methodology based on weighted multiscale entropy approach. Mech Syst Sig Process 147:107073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S’anchez R-V, Lucero P, V’asquez RE, Cerrada M, Macancela J-C, Cabrera D, Pacheco F (2018) Feature ranking for multi-fault diagnosis of rotating machinery by using random forest and KNN. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34:3463–3473. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider T, Helwig N, Schütze A (2018) Industrial condition monitoring with smart sensors using automated feature extraction and selection. Meas Sci Technol 29:094002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aad1d4

  12. Urbanowicz RJ, Meeker M, La Cava W, Olson RS, Moore JH (2018) Relief-based feature selection: introduction and review. J Biomed Inform 85:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan Ke, Ma L, Dai Y, Shen W, Ji Z (2018) Cost-sensitive and sequential feature selection for chiller fault detection and diagnosis. Int J Refrig 86:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahn G, Hur S (2020) Efficient genetic algorithm for feature selection for early time series classification. Comput Indust Eng 142:106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jalali SK, Ghandi H, Motamedi M (2020) Intelligent condition monitoring of ball bearings faults by combination of genetic algorithm and support vector machines. J Nondestruct Eval 39:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-0665-7

  16. Anbu M, Anandha Mala GS (2019) Feature selection using firefly algorithm in software defect prediction. Clust Comput 22:10925–10934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1235-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang X-S (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimization. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 2:78–84. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1003.1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marie-Sainte SL, Alalyani N (2020) Firefly algorithm based feature selection for Arabic text classification. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inf Sci 32:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saravanan N, Ramachandran KI (2010) Incipient gear box fault diagnosis using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for feature extraction and classification using artificial neural network (ANN). Expert Syst Appl 37:4168–4181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lobato THG, da Silva RR, da Costa ES, Mesquita ALA (2020) An integrated approach to rotating machinery fault diagnosis using EEMD, SVM, and augmented data. J Vib Eng Technol 8:403–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00167-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumbhar SG, Desavale RG, Dharwadkar NV (2021) Fault size diagnosis of rolling element bearing using artificial neural network and dimension theory. Neural Comput Appl 33:16079–16093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06228-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunerkar RS, Jalan AK, Belgamwar SU (2019) Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing based on artificial neural network. J Mech Sci Technol 33:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0103-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hameed SS, Muralidharan V, Ane BK (2021) Comparative analysis of fuzzy classifier and ANN with histogram features for defect detection and classification in planetary gearbox. Appl Soft Comput 106:107306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107306

  24. Michael Thomas Rex F, Andrews A, Krishnakumari A, Hariharasakthisudhan P (2020) A hybrid approach for fault diagnosis of spur gears using Hu invariant moments and artificial neural networks. Metrol Meas Syst 27:451–464. https://doi.org/10.24425/mms.2020.134587

  25. Zhang J, Zhang Q, He X, Sun G, Zhou D (2020) Compound-fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a fused imbalance learning method. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 4:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221080560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhamande LS, Chaudhari MB (2018) Compound gear-bearing fault feature extraction using statistical features based on time-frequency method. Measurement 125:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guangwei Yu, Wang X, Da C (2022) Compound mechanical fault diagnosis based on CMDE. Adv Mech Eng 14:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221080560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moshrefzadeh A, Fasana A (2017) Planetary gearbox with localized bearings and gears faults: simulation and time/frequency analysis. Meccanica 52(15):3759–3779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0680-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. TangJ WuJ, Hu B, Liu J (2022) An intelligent diagnosis method using fault feature regions for untrained compound faults of rolling bearings. Measurement 204:112100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yi Z, Pan N, Guo Y (2018) Mechanical compound faults extraction based on improved frequency domain blind deconvolution algorithm. Mech Syst Signal Process 113:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao L, Gong J, Chong H (2020) The extraction method of gearbox compound fault features based on EEMD and cloud model. Math Probl Eng 2020:6661975. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6661975

  32. Lyu X, Hu Z, Zhou H, Wang Q (2019) Application of improved MCKD method based on QGA in planetary gear compound fault diagnosis. Measurement 139:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ou L, Yu D (2016) Compound fault diagnosis of gearboxes based on GFT component extraction. Meas Sci Technol 27:115007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/11/115007

  34. Zhong B, Zhao M, Zhong S, Lin L, Wang L (2022) Mechanical compound fault diagnosis via suppressing intra-class dispersions : a deep progressive shrinkage perspective. Measurement 199:111433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111433

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Algorithm development, experiment preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Andrews Athisayam. Manisekar Kondal provided feedback on the concept and overseas the entire process. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Andrews Athisayam and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrews Athisayam.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athisayam, A., Kondal, M. Fault feature selection for the identification of compound gear-bearing faults using firefly algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 1777–1788 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10846-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10846-y

Keywords

Navigation