Skip to main content
Log in

Research on process simulation and surface quality of the thin-walled neck by precision boring

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thin-walled parts are critical structural components in the aircraft industry. However, because thin-walled parts have low stiffness, it is impossible to eliminate the elastic deformation generated by cutting force during the machining process, resulting in poor machining accuracy. In this paper, the simulation and surface roughness prediction model of thin-walled necks with ribbed constrained at both ends were constructed to understand the deformation mechanism and processing quality of thin-walled necks. The deformation mechanism of thin-walled necks with thin rib structures was revealed, and the deformation mode of the “S” shape to the “V” shape of fine boring thin-walled parts was analyzed. Then, the temperature field and the residual stress of the thin-walled neck with the spindle speed, feed, and depth of cut were revealed. Finally, the surface roughness prediction model for thin-walled parts is established using multiple regression functions. This study provides a theoretical foundation and technical assistance for managing the boring quality of thin-walled items by deeply understanding the machining deformation and cutting process mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ge G, Xiao Y, Feng X, Du Z (2022) An efficient prediction method for the dynamic deformation of thin-walled parts in flank milling. CAD Comput Aided Des 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2022.103401

  2. Balaji M, Mala C, Siva MS (2020) A Novel Method for Fault Tolerance Intelligence Advisor System (FT-IAS) for Mission Critical Operations. In: A Journey Towards Bio-inspired Techniques in Software Engineering. Springer, pp 29–46

  3. Sushchenko O (2022) Modeling Dynamically Tuned Gyroscopes. In: 2022 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET). pp 124–127

  4. Dai M, Zhang C, Lu J (2019) In-field calibration method for DTG IMU including g-sensitivity biases. IEEE Sens J 19:4972–4981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Junqueira FDC, de Barros EA (2004) Development of a Dynamically Tuned Gyroscope – Dtg. ABCM Symp Ser Mechatron 1:470–478

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jin X, Gao R, Li C et al (2022) On-machine measurement and temperature compensation method of NURBS surface interpolation for semicircular narrow neck thickness based on ultra-precision machine tool[J]. Meas Sci Technol 33(6):065008

  7. Jin X, Gao R, Li C et al (2022) On-machine measurement and temperature compensation method of NURBS surface interpolation for semicircular narrow neck thickness based on ultra-precision machine tool. Meas Sci Technol 33. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac543f

  8. Wang X, Ma P, Peng X, Ning S (2020) Study on vibration suppression performance of a flexible fixture for a thin-walled casing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4281–4291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04696-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang G, Li WL, Tong G, Pang CT (2017) Improving the machining accuracy of thin-walled parts by online measuring and allowance compensation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:2755–2763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0358-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li B, Deng H, Hui D et al (2020) A semi-analytical model for predicting the machining deformation of thin-walled parts considering machining-induced and blank initial residual stress. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110:139–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05862-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ratchev S, Liu S, Huang W, Becker AA (2006) An advanced FEA based force induced error compensation strategy in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:542–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu J, Xu L, Geng Z et al (2020) 3D surface topography simulation and experiments for ball-end NC milling considering dynamic feedrate. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 31:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniyan I, Fameso F, Ale F et al (2020) Modelling, simulation and experimental validation of the milling operation of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:1853–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta MK, Korkmaz ME, Sarıkaya M et al (2022) In-process detection of cutting forces and cutting temperature signals in cryogenic assisted turning of titanium alloys: An analytical approach and experimental study. Mech Syst Signal Process 169:108772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bolar G, Joshi SN (2018) Numerical Modeling and Experimental Validation of Machining of Low-Rigidity Thin-Wall Parts. In: Precision Product-Process Design and Optimization. Springer, pp 99–122

  16. Sun H, Fu S, Jin H, Fu Y (2018) Numerical Simulation of Workpiece Deformation in Thin-Wall Milling under Coupled Thermal-Mechanical Conditions. In: 2018 Eighth International Conference on Instrumentation \& Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC). pp 20–24

  17. Yi J, Xiang J, Yi F et al (2020) Prediction of mesoscale deformation in milling micro thin wall based on cantilever boundary. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:2875–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Wang C, Han L et al (2021) The influence of ice-based fixture on suppressing machining-induced deformation of cantilever thin-walled parts: a novel and green fixture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 117:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia Z, Lu X, Gu H et al (2021) Deflection prediction of micro-milling Inconel 718 thin-walled parts. J Mater Process Technol 291:117003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao H, Li X, Wu Q et al (2022) Effects of residual stress and equivalent bending stiffness on the dimensional stability of the thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:4907–4924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08252-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, Zhao B, Ding W et al (2022) A short review on machining deformation control of aero - engine thin - walled casings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2971–2985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09546-w

  22. Li Y, Cheng X, Ling S et al (2022) Study on deformation and compensation for micromilling of thin walls. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:2537–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08798-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hou Y, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Wu B (2021) The variable radial depth of cut in finishing machining of thin-walled blade based on the stable-state deformation field. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06472-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong H, Ji Y, Wang X, Bi Q (2021) Stability analysis of thin-walled parts end milling considering cutting depth regeneration effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:3319–3328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06610-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bolar G, Joshi SN (2014) 3D finite element modeling of thin-wall machining of aluminum 7075-T6 alloy. 5th Int 26th All India Manuf Technol Des Res Conf 135 (1–6)

  26. Zhuo Y, Han Z, An D, Jin H (2021) Surface topography prediction in peripheral milling of thin-walled parts considering cutting vibration and material removal effect. Int J Mech Sci 211:106797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber D, Kirsch B, Jonsson JE et al (2022) Simulation based compensation techniques to minimize distortion of thin-walled monolithic aluminum parts due to residual stresses. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 38:427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng Z, Ni C, Yang Y et al (2021) Numerical analysis of serrated chip formation mechanism with Johnson-Cook parameters in micro-cutting of Ti6Al4V. Metals (Basel) 11:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Artois K , Schutten G , Noordman B (2018) Correction method for thermomechanical strain in internal sting balances based on thermal modal analysis[C]// 11th International Symposium on Strain-Gauge Balances (ISSGB)

  30. Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2006) A contribution to a qualitative understanding of thermo-mechanical effects during chip formation in hard turning. J Mater Process Technol 176:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li C, Piao Y, Hu Y et al (2021) Modelling and experimental investigation of temperature field during fly-cutting of KDP crystals. Int J Mech Sci 210:106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajaguru J, Dwivedi M, Natarajan S et al (2022) Machining induced residual stress prediction during orthogonal cutting of super duplex stainless steel using CEL approach. J Manuf Process 82:474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang X, Kong X, He S, Wu K (2021) Modeling the superposition of residual stresses induced by cutting force and heat during the milling of thin-walled parts. J Manuf Process 68:356–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wan M, Ye X-Y, Yang Y, Zhang W-H (2017) Theoretical prediction of machining-induced residual stresses in three-dimensional oblique milling processes. Int J Mech Sci 133:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Akhtar W, Lazoglu I, Liang SY (2022) Prediction and control of residual stress-based distortions in the machining of aerospace parts: A review. J Manuf Process 76:106–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarıkaya M, Gupta MK, Tomaz I et al (2021) A state-of-the-art review on tool wear and surface integrity characteristics in machining of superalloys. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35:624–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research provided by the National Pre-research Project (NO.41423020201), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (NO.2022M711807).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zhongpeng Zheng: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. Jiajing Guo: writing—review, and editing. Ruilin Gao: methodology. Xin Jin: conceptualization; supervision. Zhenwei Jiang: formal analysis. Chaojiang Li: conceptualization; methodology; formal analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhongpeng Zheng or Chaojiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Guo, J., Gao, R. et al. Research on process simulation and surface quality of the thin-walled neck by precision boring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123, 4009–4024 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10541-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10541-4

Keywords

Navigation