Skip to main content
Log in

Research on abrasive pool machining method based on gas–solid two-phase flow

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For complex curved difficult-to-machine parts, a new method based on pneumatic suspension abrasive pool bright finishing processing is proposed, using the mixing of pneumatic suspension abrasive, the workpiece surface, and fluidized abrasive to produce relative motion velocity, so that the solid particles and workpiece surface microscopic two-body abrasive wear to achieve the effect of precision machining. The experimental test material is the widely used Q235 steel plate. The experimental parameters include workpiece shape (round tube, square tube, cylindrical), abrasive particle size (24, 80, 120 mesh count), gas–solid two-phase flow pattern (dispersion fluidization state, turbulent fluidization state, spurting fluidization state), abrasive particle shape (sphere, irregular), and spindle speed (600, 900, 1200 rpm). An orthogonal test was designed according to the experimental parameters, and the degree of influence of each parameter on the processing of the abrasive cell was evaluated by the roughness of the workpiece surface together with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of the workpiece surface, and the optimal combination of parameters was judged using the extreme difference method as well as the factor trend diagram. The results show that under the present experimental conditions, the workpiece surface roughness (Ra) can reach a minimum value of 0.4 μm. The feasibility of gas–solid two-phase flow processing is demonstrated from an experimental point of view, and the advantages of abrasive cell processing are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time, as the data also form part of an ongoing study that cannot be shared at this time, due to technical or time limitations.

References

  1. Alam Z, Jha S (2017) Modeling of surface roughness in ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process. Wear 374:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grover V, Singh A (2018) Modelling of surface roughness in a new magnetorheological honing process for internal finishing of cylindrical workpieces. Int J Mech Sci 144:679–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandal S, Thomas E, Gines L, Morgan D, Green J, Brousseau E, Williams O (2018) Redox agent enhanced chemical mechanical polishing of thin film diamond. Carbon 130:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin Z, Wang R, Jhang Z (2018) Establishing a theoretical model for abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer chemical mechanical polishing by integrating a polishing times analytical model and specific down force energy theory. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 95(9):4671–4683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9345-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo L, Wang Z, Zhong S, Bao Q, Guo Z (2018) Fluidization state monitoring using electric current during fluidized bed reduction of iron ore. Powder Technol 343:683–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, Qi G, Li Z, Zhang S, Hassan M, Liu X, Lu H (2019) Numerical simulation of flow behavior of topped gas-particles jet in a bubbling fluidized bed. Powder Technol 348:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pietrobono F, Rubino G, Tagliaferri V, Trovalusci F (2019) Sample position inside abrasive fluidized bed to obtain morphology uniformity. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03539-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen K, Bachmann P, Bück A, Jacob M, Tsotsas E (2019) CFD simulation of particle residence time distribution in industrial scale horizontal fluidized bed. Powder Technol 345:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grigorov P, Muzzio F, Glasser B (2019) Modeling fluidized bed impregnation of active pharmaceutical ingredients onto porous excipients. Chem Eng Sci 202:36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uzi A, Levy A (2018) Energy absorption by the particle and the surface during impact. Wear 404:92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng C, Liu Y, Chen C, Qin J, Zhang S (2017) Finite element analysis on the dynamic erosion process using multiple-particle impact model. Powder Technol 315:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang Y, Fan X, Li T, Xiao S (2018) Influence of particle-size segregation on the impact of dry granular flow. Powder Technol 340:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahin S, Reza S, Borhan M, Saeed Z (2021) The impact of SiC, Al2O3, and B2O3 abrasive particles and temperature on wear characteristics of 18Ni (300) maraging steel in abrasive flow machining (AFM). Int J Hydrogen Energ 46(68):33991–34001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pathak C, Dodkar P (2020) Effect of shot blasting and shot peening parameters on residual stresses induced in connecting rod. Trans Indian Inst Met 73(2):571–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-01866-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaijalainen A, Vili K, Jouko H, Raimo R, Porter D, Kömi J (2018) Bendability of shot blasted ultrahigh-strength steels. Mater Sci Forum 941:510–515. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang T, Wang S, Abdullahi Y, Jiang Z, Fang J, Fu X, Men X (2021) Study on the dynamic fatigue performance of shot blasting machine’s blades based on modal analysis. J Phys Conf Ser 1948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1948/1/012214

  17. Wu J, Liu H, Wei P, Zhu C, Lin Q (2020) Effect of shot peening coverage on hardness, residual stress and surface morphology of carburized rollers. Surf Coat Tech 384(C):125273–125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125273

  18. Chen Y, Wang J, Gao Y, Feng A (2019) Effect of shot peening on fatigue performance of Ti 2 AlNb intermetallic alloy. Int J Fatigue 127:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovacı H, Bozkurt Y, Yetim A, Aslan M, Çelik A (2019) The effect of surface plastic deformation produced by shot peening on corrosion behavior of a low-alloy steel. Surf Coat Tech 360:78–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu H, Jiang C, Chen M, Wang L, Ji V (2019) Surface layer microstructures and wear properties modifications of Mg-8Gd-3Y alloy treated by shot peening. Mater Charac 158(C):109952–109952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.109952

  21. Silva K, Carneiro J, Coelho R, Pinto H, Brito P (2019) Influence of shot peening on residual stresses and tribological behavior of cast and austempered ductile iron. Wear 440(C): 203099–203099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.203099

  22. Maleki E, Unal O, Kashyzadeh K (2019) Surface layer nanocrystallization of carbon steels subjected to severe shot peening: analysis and optimization. Mater Charac 157(C): 109877–109877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.109877

  23. Pritima D, Dhinakaran V, Stalin B, Ravichandran M, Balasubramanian M, Anand Chairman C (2020) Surface roughness prediction and parametric optimization of shot blasting of Al7068 using RSM. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 988(1):012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/988/1/012100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohamed A, Zoheir F, Andrew W, James G (2018) Effect of a Moving Automated Shot Peening and Peening Parameters on Surface Integrity of Low Carbon Steel. J Mater Process Tech 277.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116399

  25. Lim L, Lim E (2019) Mixing and segregation behaviors of a binary mixture in a pulsating fluidized bed. Powder Technol 345:311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Namdarkedenji R, Hashemnia K, Emdad H (2018) Effect of flow pulsation on fluidization degree of gas-solid fluidized beds by using coupled CFD-DEM. Adv Powder Technol 29(12):3527–3541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lv B, Luo Z, Zhang B, Qin X (2018) Particle motion and separation behavior of coal in gas–solid separation fluidized bed. Powder Technol 339:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work has been partly supported by Key R&D project of Shandong Province (2019GGX104081, 2019GGX104033), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51805299), Shandong Province’s Key Support Regions Introducing Urgently Needed Talent Projects, and Young Innovative Talents Introduction and Training Program Project of Shandong Provincial Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Investigation, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, software, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing: Q.G. Formal analysis and software: W.W., X.L. Conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing: B.C. Supervision and review—editing: X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qianjian Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, W., Wang, W., Guo, Q. et al. Research on abrasive pool machining method based on gas–solid two-phase flow. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123, 4109–4122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10503-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10503-w

Keywords

Navigation