Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligent surface defect detection for submersible pump impeller using MobileNet V2 architecture

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intelligent defect detection is gaining popularity in companies, in lieu of manual quality check. An automated visual inspection system can be used to check high-quality items while minimizing the strain on the labor. The shell casting process of the pump impeller is prone to surface defects like extra projection, shrinkage, etc., due to high operating temperatures. CNN is a deep learning technique employed for performing quality check which prefers image as an input and classifies it according to the features. An organization’s original dataset was used which consisted of 7348 images. The dataset was divided into four categories, i.e., extra projection, shrinkage, multiple defects, and ideal workpiece. The 90% of original dataset (i.e., 6633 from 7348) was split into 70:30 for training and validation, respectively. Augmentation was done to increase the dataset size to 12,000 images in order to avoid overfitting. To assess the capability of architecture for an unobserved data (i.e., testing), 300 images were randomly chosen from the remaining 10% of the original dataset (i.e., 715). MobileNet V2, ResNet-18 and general model were chosen as the CNN architecture. Out of the three models, MobileNet V2 portrayed promising results with the highest test accuracy of 98.17% followed by the ResNet-18 and the general models which attained the test accuracies of 97.58% and 93.58%, respectively. A graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to assist workers in addition to the suggestion of remedial measures for the defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shell Moulding Casting - Shell Moulding Casting For Impeller Manufacturer from Rajkot. https://www.indiamart.com/sahjanand-technocast/shell-moulding-casting.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2022

  2. Yang J, Li S, Wang Z, Dong H, Wang J, Tang S (2020) Using Deep Learning to Detect Defects in Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Survey and Current Challenges. Materials 13(24):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang T, Chen Y, Qiao M, Snoussi H (2017) A fast and robust convolutional neural network-based defect detection model in product quality control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3465–3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0882-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang B, Jaiswal P, Rai R, Guerrier P, Baggs G (2019) Convolutional neural network-based inspection of metal additive manufacturing parts. Rapid Prototyping J 25(3):530–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2018-0096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alencastre-Miranda M, Johnson R, Krebs H (2021) Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learning for Quality Inspection of Different Sugarcane Varieties. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(2):787–794. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2992229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benbarrad T, Eloutouate L, Arioua M, Elouaai F, Laanaoui M (2021) Impact of Image Compression on the Performance of Steel Surface Defect Classification with a CNN. J Sens Actuator Netw 10(4):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan10040073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li L, Liou F (2020) Metal Additive Manufacturing Parts Inspection Using Convolutional Neural Network. Appl Sci 10(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen T, Choi S, Park S, Park S, Yoon J (2020) Inspecting Method for Defective Casting Products with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Int J Precision Eng Manufacturing-Green Technol 8(2):583–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00197-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong Y, Guo X, Ye Q, Yan W (2021) Shrinkage during solidification of complex structure castings based on convolutional neural network deformation prediction research. Int J Adv Manufacturing Technol 118(11–12):4073–4084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08137-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimizu R, Yanagawa S, Shimizu T, Hamada M, Kuroda T (2017) Convolutional neural network for industrial egg classification. Int SoC Design Conference (ISOCC), Seoul, South Korea, 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOCC.2017.8368830

  11. Wei P, Liu C, Liu M, Gao Y, Liu H (2018) CNN-based reference comparison method for classifying bare PCB defects. J Eng 16:1528–1533. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.8271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balzategui J, Eciolaza L, Arana-Arexolaleiba N, Altube J, Aguerre J, Legarda-Ereno I and Apraiz A (2019) Semi-automatic quality inspection of solar cell based on Convolutional Neural Networks. 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain, 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869359

  13. Kaggle.com. Casting product image data for quality inspection. https://www.kaggle.com/ravirajsinh45/real-life-industrial-dataset-of-casting-product

  14. Sandler M., Howard A., Zhu M., Zhmoginov A. and Chen L., (2018) MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA, 4510-4520. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474

  15. Image Classification with MobileNet. https://medium.com/analytics-vidhya/image-classification-with-mobilenet-cc6fbb2cd470. Accessed 17 Sept 2022

  16. MATLAB (2021b) https://in.mathworks.com/products/new_products/latest_features.html. Accessed 17 Sept 2022

  17. Oborski P, Wysocki P (2022) Intelligent Visual Quality Control System Based on Convolutional Neural Networks for Holonic Shop Floor Control of Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems. Adv Sci Technol Res J 16(2):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Shreeram Gopal S and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Purushothaman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors respect the ethical guidelines of the journal.

Consent to participate

This publication has been approved by all co-authors.

Consent for publication

The work described has not been published before and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sambandam, S.G., Purushothaman, R., Baig, R.U. et al. Intelligent surface defect detection for submersible pump impeller using MobileNet V2 architecture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 3519–3532 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10386-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10386-x

Keywords

Navigation