Abstract
Surface treatments are needed for the inhibition of fatigue cracking on metallic components. Abrasive waterjet peening is a promising method for the surface treatment of metals. Compared to pure waterjet peening, the demands of operating devices are lower for abrasive waterjet peening. The application of water can effectively reduce the friction and the thermal effect, which is beneficial to prevent the surface deterioration induced by the abrasive particles. The generated residual compressive stress is crucial for improving the fatigue performance of the workpiece by counteracting the tensile stress due to the external cyclic load. In the present study, a numerical model for the abrasive waterjet peening of TC4 titanium alloy was established to evaluate the effects of operating parameters on the residual stress. The feasibility of the numerical model is verified by experiments. The results indicated that the water pressure and shot diameter are the most significant parameters in adjusting the magnitude and distribution of residual compressive stress. Moreover, quantitative prediction for residual stress was also conducted through the response surface method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
The software used in the present study is authorized.
References
Bianchetti C, Delbergue D, Bocher P, Lévesque M, Brochu M (2019) Analytical fatigue life prediction of shot peened AA 7050–T7451. Int J Fatigue 118:271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.007
Kobayashi M, Matsui T, Murakami Y (1998) Mechanism of creation of compressive residual stress by shot peening. Int J Fatigue 20:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00002-4
Azhari A, Schindler C, Kerscher E, Grad P (2012) Improving surface hardness of austenitic stainless steel using waterjet peening process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3962-1
Azhari A, Schindler C, Li B (2013) Effect of waterjet peening on aluminum alloy 5005. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:785–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4522-4
Wang J (2007) Predictive depth of jet penetration models for abrasive waterjet cutting of alumina ceramics. Int J Mech Sci 49:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.09.005
Xie J, Rittel D (2018) The effects of waterjet peening on a random-topography metallic implant surface. Eur J Mech - A/Solids 71:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.03.022
Lieblich M, Barriuso S, Ibáñez J, Ruiz-de-Lara L, Díaz M, Ocaña JL, Alberdi A, González-Carrasco JL (2016) On the fatigue behavior of medical Ti6Al4V roughened by grit blasting and abrasiveless waterjet peening. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 63:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.011
Srivastava M, Hloch S, Krejci L, Chattopadhyaya S, Dixit AR, Foldyna J (2018) Residual stress and surface properties of stainless steel welded joints induced by ultrasonic pulsed water jet peening. Measurement 127:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.012
Arola D, Mccain ML (2015) Abrasive waterjet peening: a new method of surface preparation for metal orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 53:536–546
Arola D, McCain ML, Kunaporn S, Ramulu M (2001) Waterjet and abrasive waterjet surface treatment of titanium: a comparison of surface texture and residual stress. Wear 249:943–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00826-2
Balaji DS, Jeyapoovan T (2021) Multi-objective optimization in abrasive water jet peening on AA6063 alloy. Mater Today Proc 45:1928–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.220
Sadasivam B, Hizal A, Arola D (2009) Abrasive waterjet peening with elastic prestress: a parametric evaluation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.001
Fernández Pariente I, Guagliano M (2008) About the role of residual stresses and surface work hardening on fatigue ΔKth of a nitrided and shot peened low-alloy steel. Surf Coatings Technol 202:3072–3080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.11.015
Franchim AS, De CVS, Travessa DN, Neto CDM (2009) Analytical modelling for residual stresses produced by shot peening. Mater Des 30:1556–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.040
Boyce BL, Chen X, Hutchinson JWW, Ritchie ROO (2001) The residual stress state due to a spherical hard-body impact. Mech Mater 33:441–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00064-3
Frija M, Hassine T, Fathallah R, Bouraoui C, Dogui A (2006) Finite element modelling of shot peening process: prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plastic deformations and the surface integrity. Mater Sci Eng A 426:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.097
Hong T, Ooi JY, Shaw B (2008) A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Eng Fail Anal 15:1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.017
Ness E, Zibbell R (1996) Abrasion and erosion of hard materials related to wear in the abrasive waterjet. Wear 196:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06886-4
Li H, Lee A, Fan J, Yeoh GH, Wang J (2014) On DEM-CFD study of the dynamic characteristics of high speed micro-abrasive air jet. Powder Technol 267:161–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.07.018
Klotz T, Miao HY, Bianchetti C, Lévesque M, Brochu M (2018) Analytical fatigue life prediction of shot peened Inconel 718. Int J Fatigue 113:204–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.011
Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2009) On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw 40:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013
Wang Z, Liao Z, Axinte D, Dong X, Xu D, Augustinavicius G (2021) Analytical model for predicting residual stresses in abrasive waterjet peening. Mater Des 212:110209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110209
Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A Constitutive modeling and data for metals subjected to large strain rates and high temperatures. Proc 7th Int Symp Ballist 12:541–547
Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristic of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48
Poloprudský J, Nag A, Kruml T, Hloch S (2022) Effects of liquid droplet volume and impact frequency on the integrity of Al alloy AW2014 exposed to subsonic speeds of pulsating water jets. Wear 488–489:204136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.204136
Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC, Daly J (1999) Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 31:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(98)00057-2
Funding
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ME154).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhe Lv completed the main work of writing, simulation, and experimental works; Rongguo Hou conducted part of the simulation work; Rui Wang and Yulong Zhang conducted parts of the experimental works; and Miaomiao Zhang collected the data of simulations and experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lv, Z., Hou, R., Wang, R. et al. Numerical investigation on the residual stress in abrasive waterjet peening. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123, 1695–1706 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10285-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10285-1